Aller au contenu

Photo

What's with the anti-Cerberus and "racism" trend?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
198 réponses à ce sujet

#51
Moiaussi

Moiaussi
  • Members
  • 2 890 messages

Prince Keldar wrote...

Thats true.  Although I still do not like Cerberus you make some valid arguments.  


Don't worry, there are plenty of valid reasons to dislike Cerberus. Lack of accountability and degree of risks taken are the top two that come to mind.

It really irked me that there was no option to simply commandeer the shuttle from the Lazerus base. You end up agreeing to work with the Illusive Man before even confirming the Council have written you off, and you are given no option to convince the Council no matter how Paragon you are, or even what evidence you have found (such as the Collectors being Protheans, or the intact beacon).

#52
PWENER

PWENER
  • Members
  • 1 774 messages

Moiaussi wrote...

Prince Keldar wrote...

Thats true.  Although I still do not like Cerberus you make some valid arguments.  


Don't worry, there are plenty of valid reasons to dislike Cerberus. Lack of accountability and degree of risks taken are the top two that come to mind.

It really irked me that there was no option to simply commandeer the shuttle from the Lazerus base. You end up agreeing to work with the Illusive Man before even confirming the Council have written you off, and you are given no option to convince the Council no matter how Paragon you are, or even what evidence you have found (such as the Collectors being Protheans, or the intact beacon).


Like they'd believe you. They don't believe in the Reapers let alone the Collectors (wich some people regard as legends) being a race that existed 50,000 years ago and dominated the entire galaxy.

Back on topic; I don't believe in all of Cerberus's policies, but humanity needs them and if it wasn't for them, Humanity would be in the brink of extinction by ME3.TIM is not evil, just excentric and reclusive (The Reclusive Man, lol) and extremist. I'll stay with them all the way to destroy the Reapers, because why would I go around recruiting the Council races and the Alliance, they all betrayed me, so why would I go back to them when I've got by my side...

Cerberus, the Quarians, the Krogan, the Rachni and the Geth. I think that's all the armies I need. Screw Udina and the Citadel. As long as Anderson tells them to F*CK OFF and joins me, I'll be happy. Plus, the other races will believe me once my armies start fighting the first Reaper invasion waves, and I'll finally get the idiotic Council to say they're sorry... especially the A-hole Turian Councilor.

Anyone with me?

Oh, and I hope killing the TIM and taking over Cerberus as the guardians of Humanity is an option in ME3. But that's just me (please don't judge, I know other people have they're own Shepard endings in mind as well).

#53
MotoSkunkX

MotoSkunkX
  • Members
  • 145 messages
Right on PWENER. People love to forget that without Cerberus and The Illusive man, Shepard would be dead and by extension so would humanity. Hence, Cerberus has already saved humanity once. Regardless of what you think about them, you have to face the facts. Naturally I'm biased due to my bro-love for Martin Sheen, but I can still look at Cerberus objectively.



As a side note, it's irritating how 99% of people use the word racism to mean whatever they want it to mean. The guy who used the word Jingoist was correct, the rest of you were not and should be shot for violating the english language.

#54
Moiaussi

Moiaussi
  • Members
  • 2 890 messages

PWENER wrote...

Like they'd believe you. They don't believe in the Reapers let alone the Collectors (wich some people regard as legends) being a race that existed 50,000 years ago and dominated the entire galaxy.


A big part of the lack of belief is a lack of independant proof. Shep was the only one to have seen the message in the first beacon and the second was destroyed on Vermire. There is now a third intact beacon the Council could investigate independantly, but Shep doesn't even mention it to them.

Similarly, the Collector DNA data. Samples could have been brought back and offered.

And Normandy 2 is a ruddy stealth frigate that belongs to a so called enemy, yet you claim that the Council wouldn't take it into custody even if it was literally handed to them?

Besides, it bothered me that Shep didn't even have the option to offer. As I recall, he likewise doesn't have the option of going to the press and presenting his case regarding the Reapers. The Council were happy to hype him up as a hero. It would be difficult for them to suddenly declare him unstable or try to take him down publicly.


Back on topic; I don't believe in all of Cerberus's policies, but humanity needs them and if it wasn't for them, Humanity would be in the brink of extinction by ME3.TIM is not evil, just excentric and reclusive (The Reclusive Man, lol) and extremist. I'll stay with them all the way to destroy the Reapers, because why would I go around recruiting the Council races and the Alliance, they all betrayed me, so why would I go back to them when I've got by my side...

Cerberus, the Quarians, the Krogan, the Rachni and the Geth. I think that's all the armies I need. Screw Udina and the Citadel. As long as Anderson tells them to F*CK OFF and joins me, I'll be happy. Plus, the other races will believe me once my armies start fighting the first Reaper invasion waves, and I'll finally get the idiotic Council to say they're sorry... especially the A-hole Turian Councilor.

Anyone with me?

Oh, and I hope killing the TIM and taking over Cerberus as the guardians of Humanity is an option in ME3. But that's just me (please don't judge, I know other people have they're own Shepard endings in mind as well).


I agree with respect to the Council at this point, but feel that there should have been that option regarding the Illusive Man, too. A big part of the distrust on the part of the Council is that Shep is working with Cerberus, and the only way they would have known that in advance (remember they knew it as soon as the Normandy left dock if not earlier) is deliberate leak.

TIM set Shep up with respect to the Council.

#55
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages
With regards to the Council's knowledge of Shepard's allegiance to Cerberus, your point depends entirely on when Shepard visits them, does it not?

In fact, if I was going to construct an order to go to each world and quest based on when they made sense to the plot, I'd say the Citadel ought to be visited after at least two recruitment missions but before meeting Ashley/Kaiden on Horizon - as Anderson says their activities - namely investigating you and Cerberus - is classified.

Edit: Though I might have forgotten because I've deleted them since my first playthrough, but if you get a Cerberus-related email from Anderson at the start of the game, then disregard my post and I concede the entirety of your point.

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 26 août 2010 - 10:06 .


#56
ThatDancingTurian

ThatDancingTurian
  • Members
  • 5 110 messages
I don't hate Cerberus because they hate aliens. I hate Cerberus because they're sneaky, underhanded, they get away with a ton of downright evil stuff by using plausible deniability, they killed Kahoku, and in the case of my Sole Survivor, they killed my team. I think that's enough reasons without adding 'racist' to the list.

#57
DPSSOC

DPSSOC
  • Members
  • 3 033 messages
Alright I'm going to put the whole Pro-Human/Anti-Alien issue into context with a real world example.

I am Canadian, born and raised.  I am Pro-Canada, this means that I believe my country should put our interests first and I support groups and take actions that further those interests.  This does not make me Anti-anybody though of course instances will arise where my Pro-Canada status will put me at odds with other Pro-groups and this is simply because we can't all always win.

Now if I were Anti-America let's say I would support groups and take actions that harm or hinder American interests simply for the sake of doing it.  Sometimes these two goals will intersect, sometimes in order to further my interests I have no choice but to hinder yours and that's unfortunately how the game is played.

So can anyone point to an instance where Cerberus has worked to harm or hinder the interests of another race for no other reason than to do it?  Is there anything they've done that was done purely to harm or hinder the other races with no other goal in mind?



Warning: Off-topic rant commencing


Daewan wrote...

mosor wrote...

Siansonea II wrote...
Yeah, for what they did to Jack, Admiral Kahoku, Corporal Toombs, and countless other humans and non-humans alike,>snip<

>snip<

No, instead they spent all their time damaging other Humans.  I'm sure they had a really good reason, that wasn't "racist" at all.  No, wait, that doesn't make any sense.  Okay, you tell me.  Why did they do all that stuff to other Humans?


Jack - experimenting on making an Asari super-biotic doesn't help humanity in the least.  The experiments were to help understand and enhance human biotics to level the playing field with the other species.  It was crude and brutal admittedly but when you're playing catch-up against a gap of hundreds if not thousands of years you don't exactly have the luxury of time.

Akuze/Toombs - Thresher Maws are a very real threat in the galaxy and we need to be able to deal with them.  Akuze showed how well Alliance training and equipment fared in the face of a Thresher Maw (not well apparently).  The experiments on Toombs allowed us to discover how human physiology responded to Thresher Maw venom.  Like Jack these experiments were crude and brutal but ultimately necessary to achieve immediately usable results.  There's only one way to test the effectiveness of anti-venom, you gotta get bit.

Admiral Kahoku - Now not knowing the circumstances around the death of his men I will provide 2 explanations based on the 2 most likely scenarios in my opinion.  In no particular order:

Scenario 1 - Kahoku's men were lured to the Thresher nest in order to evaluate Alliance measures against Thresher Maws (Stage 2 of the Akuze experiment if you will).  Like Akuze the losses are regrettable but necessary to achieve an accurate real-world assessment of Alliance soldiers.  Kahoku's investigation of the incident compromised Cerberus' security forcing them to take action against him

Scenario 2 - Kahoku's men were lured to the nest as there investigation into the death of Armistan Banes compromised Cerberus security and they needed a way to eliminate an entire squad while making it look like nothing more than a tragic accident (people being gunned down while investigating something tends to draw attention).  Kahoku's investigation further compromised Cerberus' security forcing them to take action against them.

Both of these scenarios forward the interests of the species.  Scenario 1 tests the effectiveness of measures taken after Akuze and allows further advancements to be made.  Scenario 2 preserves the Alliance politcal image by keeping the black sheep secret (somewhat undone by ME2 but to my knowledge it's never made clear if the Council races know Cerberus was originally an Alliance initiative).  Both are tragic, even criminal to a certain degree, but ultimately in the best interests of humanity as a whole.

Now not to seem insensitive and not to condone the way the situation was handled but Kahoku brought his fate on himself.  The loss of his men is tragic but Kahoku chose his own fate the moment he chose to take action.  Once he found out what kind of people he was dealing with Kahoku could have walked away, he could have run with the story that they were killed by a Thresher while investigating an Alliance distress beacon and let the matter be.  He chose, and had good reason to choose, to press the matter in honour of his men, he brought Cerberus down on himself and knew full well he was doing so.

There's a running theme for me in Cerberus activites, regrettable but necessary.  With Jack, Akuze, and Scenario 1 we need to deveop these technologies and we can't afford to take the time to figure them out the safe way or wait for the Council races to offer their handouts if we want to remain masters of our own fate.  The Hanar, the Elcor, and the Volus all chose complacency and they are now serfs, servants of the Council with no real might (political or otherwise) of their own.  We know their history, we've seen their actions, we know what the Council does when a species pushes to far or demands too much.  If we want to continue pushing, if we want more than what the Council is willing to give us, then we need to be prepared when they choose to strike, for they will strike when our usefulness no longer outweighs our ability to challenge them, when we dare to refuse to bend knee to the Asari, Turians, and Salarians they will strike.

It is not racism, to abhor tyranny.  It is not supremist to demand freedom.  It is not criminal to strive for excellence.

#58
PWENER

PWENER
  • Members
  • 1 774 messages
Finally, people who think like I do. I don't agree with some of DPSSOC's statements though. Im with Cerberus, but they have done bad stuff and should take responsability.

#59
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages

Aris Ravenstar wrote...

I don't hate Cerberus because they hate aliens. I hate Cerberus because they're sneaky, underhanded, they get away with a ton of downright evil stuff by using plausible deniability, they killed Kahoku, and in the case of my Sole Survivor, they killed my team. I think that's enough reasons without adding 'racist' to the list.


Well, honestly, so does the Alliance - like the nuclear armed recon probes that they just chucked out into space during the First Contact War.  

As did any/all of the private companies that operate on Noveria.

So what I'm saying is, it's perfectly reasonable to dislike Cerberus on a personal or principled basis, but to accuse them of racism is inaccurate and misleading and serves to confuse the issues they are supposed to raise.  In fact they are the end result of a purely Renegade view of the galaxy.  Paragon/Renegade isn't good vs. evil, it's morality vs. expediency.  So in that sense, Cerberus exists to hold a mirror up to your Shepard:  If Paragon, it's to contrast how wildly different methods can secure some of the same goals and even coexist in pursuing them if just for a time.  If Renegade, it's to demonstrate what the end result of what that attitude leads to.

Cerberus may very well save the galaxy but in the end they will be reviled for it.  You know, kind of like Shepard when he sacrifices the Council at the end of Mass Effect 1 and as a result everyone resents him and humanity.  As players who remember that decision, we might view this backlash as ungrateful bitterness.  And so might Cerberus.  Unless of course we cynically disposed of the Council on purpose, in which case we're in absolutely no position to criticize them in the first place.

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 26 août 2010 - 10:20 .


#60
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 683 messages
Noveria?



Noveria's downright civilized compared to it's Asari counterpart of Illium.On Noveria, immoral corporate money-hunters conduct illegal research to design bioweapons and genetically engineer armies for their customers, largely the Alliance and other Citadel groups. Illium trades in slaves and consumer-crippling substances.

#61
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages
Point taken, and it supports the argument. Cerberus does not have a monopoly on amorality in the Mass Effect universe.

#62
Barquiel

Barquiel
  • Members
  • 5 848 messages

DPSSOC wrote...

Alright I'm going to put the whole Pro-Human/Anti-Alien issue into context with a real world example.

I am Canadian, born and raised.  I am Pro-Canada, this means that I believe my country should put our interests first and I support groups and take actions that further those interests.  This does not make me Anti-anybody though of course instances will arise where my Pro-Canada status will put me at odds with other Pro-groups and this is simply because we can't all always win.


...and you would support a canadian version of Cerberus?

a black ops organization that doesn't answer to your elected government, but to a single unelected individual who is accountable to no one?  a group that tortures canadian children and murders canadian soldiers/admirals?

...and why? canadian dominance of the world!

Modifié par Barquiel, 26 août 2010 - 10:24 .


#63
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages
Barquiel, few in this thread are saying that people should support Cerberus, just that they should be judged on what they actually are and do and not to be casually called racists by people with only a vague comprehension of what the term implies.

As I said in my earlier post, their jingoism opens up a completely different but more accurate debate over Cerberus.  It doesn't endorse them.

Edit: It's actually like Ashley - another character falsely accused of racism - explained in the first game.  When the chips are down, she believes the other races will look to their own interests and that humanity should be prepared to do the same.  To that end, sharing our defense secrets with potential enemies shouldn't be a decision taken lightly, hence her initial objection to inviting a host of aliens onto an advanced military frigate.   But she mostly gets criticism for using a dog metaphor to describe how the Council viewed the humans, which is clumsy but not racist.  She was describing her impression of the Council that views humanity as a dangerous tool that needs to be cunningly leashed before they get too dangerous.

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 26 août 2010 - 10:30 .


#64
mosor

mosor
  • Members
  • 1 372 messages
My only  problem with Cerberus is their reverse racism!  Cerberus thinks we're inferior and lacking technologically or biologically.  They believe we have to catch up and hopefully surpass the current galactic powers progress to remain at least competitive. Thats why they deem the unethical experiments absolutely necessary. It stems from insecurity that not we're good enough to lead the galaxy as we already are.

#65
mosor

mosor
  • Members
  • 1 372 messages

Barquiel wrote...

...and you would support a canadian version of Cerberus?

a black ops organization that doesn't answer to your elected government, but to a single unelected individual who is accountable to no one?  a group that tortures canadian children and murders canadian soldiers/admirals?

...and why? canadian dominance of the world!


No black ops organization really answers to an elected government official, and if they did, the government would do all it could to deny their involvement with them. There is too much blowback. That's why the alliance denies Cerberus ties.

Modifié par mosor, 26 août 2010 - 10:33 .


#66
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages

mosor wrote...

My only  problem with Cerberus is their reverse racism! 
Cerberus thinks we're inferior and lacking technologically or
biologically.  They believe we have to catch up and hopefully surpass
the current galactic powers progress to remain at least competitive.
Thats why they deem the unethical experiments absolutely necessary. It
stems from insecurity that not we're good enough to lead the galaxy as
we already are.


Eh, that's not reverse racism, that's recognizing the need to prepare for contingencies the Alliance and/or the Council aren't willing to accept.

In effect, Cerberus accepts that the ends justify the means - recognizing that the ends are if not inevitable than at least probable.

The Council - as we're all well aware - take the "see no evil" approach and bury their collective heads in the sand.

And the Alliance is, regardless of ME1 outcome, dealing with its own political designs that make the truth inconvenient.

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 26 août 2010 - 10:33 .


#67
mosor

mosor
  • Members
  • 1 372 messages

Upsettingshorts wrote...


Eh, that's not reverse racism, that's recognizing the need to prepare for contingencies the Alliance and/or the Council aren't willing to accept.

In effect, Cerberus accepts that the ends justify the means - recognizing that the ends are if not inevitable than at least probable.

The Council - as we're all well aware - take the "see no evil" approach and bury their collective heads in the sand.

And the Alliance is, regardless of ME1 outcome, dealing with its own political designs that make the truth inconvenient.


Before the reapers, I'd agree with you if they persued less extreme options. You don't go balls out and do massively unethical experiments without any immediate threats. You take your time and you prepare for the future. Going all out like that shows their insecurity. With the reapers in the picture, an extreme threat, requires extreme measures.

Don't get me wrong. From my posts, I'm obviously a cerberus booster and RP my shep working for human dominance politically.  I'm just making an observation.

Modifié par mosor, 26 août 2010 - 10:42 .


#68
PWENER

PWENER
  • Members
  • 1 774 messages

mosor wrote...

My only  problem with Cerberus is their reverse racism!  Cerberus thinks we're inferior and lacking technologically or biologically.  They believe we have to catch up and hopefully surpass the current galactic powers progress to remain at least competitive. Thats why they deem the unethical experiments absolutely necessary. It stems from insecurity that not we're good enough to lead the galaxy as we already are.


Here's the truth...

Jack's experiments had results on her and Shepard. How do you think they rebuilded Adept/Vanguard Shepard with such amazing biotic power? Second; WE ARE INFERIOR against the other races. They are 1000's of years more advanced then us, It's amazing we barely keep up as it is. We need to make sacrifices to be able to reach a certain level of balance against the other races who would sell out Humanity in a heartbeat (specially the Turians who think Humanity is too "evil" when there're just afraid we'll take threy're position as the leading military race).

The real racism comes from the aliens who think Humans are bad. Batarians are bad... but they don't care about them because they're NOT threatening the Asari, Salarians or the Turians, only Humanity. I think the council was okay with that... but they're dead now, so it doesn't matter to me.

#69
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages
Well the "real racists" if we're going to pick one has to be the Reapers. Just take a look at Harbinger's evaluation of your squadmates. They essentially hand-pick humanity for their own special form of apotheosis and view the rest of the galaxy as trash to be taken out.

Based almost entirely on their genetic properties and suitability, with criteria they've set for themselves.

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 26 août 2010 - 10:48 .


#70
DPSSOC

DPSSOC
  • Members
  • 3 033 messages

Barquiel wrote...

DPSSOC wrote...

Alright I'm going to put the whole Pro-Human/Anti-Alien issue into context with a real world example.

I am Canadian, born and raised.  I am Pro-Canada, this means that I believe my country should put our interests first and I support groups and take actions that further those interests.  This does not make me Anti-anybody though of course instances will arise where my Pro-Canada status will put me at odds with other Pro-groups and this is simply because we can't all always win.


...and you would support a canadian version of Cerberus?

a black ops organization that doesn't answer to your elected government, but to a single unelected individual who is accountable to no one?  a group that tortures canadian children and murders canadian soldiers/admirals?

...and why? canadian dominance of the world!


Absolutely, provided the need for a group like Cerberus existed.  In the ME universe a group like Cerberus is necessary because of how the Council deals with other species.  If the Council were open to other races joining them there wouldn't be as much need for a group like Cerberus but they've shown they're not.  They demand military might to hold a seat and then write treaties intent on crippling the military might of non-Council races.  They only permit races to colonize areas they deem too dangerous or unimportant to bother with.  The Council actively hinders the progress of all non-Council races so groups like Cerberus are necessary to aggressively, and forcefully when necessary, push for that progress.

#71
DPSSOC

DPSSOC
  • Members
  • 3 033 messages

PWENER wrote...

Finally, people who think like I do. I don't agree with some of DPSSOC's statements though. Im with Cerberus, but they have done bad stuff and should take responsability.


I don't deny that some Cerberus actions are terrible (and apologies if I implied I do) but they are necessary.  Something a good friend of mine told me, and I've found it to be true to the day, "Necessity makes monsters of us all."

#72
PWENER

PWENER
  • Members
  • 1 774 messages

DPSSOC wrote...

Barquiel wrote...

DPSSOC wrote...

Alright I'm going to put the whole Pro-Human/Anti-Alien issue into context with a real world example.

I am Canadian, born and raised.  I am Pro-Canada, this means that I believe my country should put our interests first and I support groups and take actions that further those interests.  This does not make me Anti-anybody though of course instances will arise where my Pro-Canada status will put me at odds with other Pro-groups and this is simply because we can't all always win.


...and you would support a canadian version of Cerberus?

a black ops organization that doesn't answer to your elected government, but to a single unelected individual who is accountable to no one?  a group that tortures canadian children and murders canadian soldiers/admirals?

...and why? canadian dominance of the world!


Absolutely, provided the need for a group like Cerberus existed.  In the ME universe a group like Cerberus is necessary because of how the Council deals with other species.  If the Council were open to other races joining them there wouldn't be as much need for a group like Cerberus but they've shown they're not.  They demand military might to hold a seat and then write treaties intent on crippling the military might of non-Council races.  They only permit races to colonize areas they deem too dangerous or unimportant to bother with.  The Council actively hinders the progress of all non-Council races so groups like Cerberus are necessary to aggressively, and forcefully when necessary, push for that progress.


The holy post has been made...

This is the exact function of Cerberus. A guardian for Humanity.

Image IPB

Okay, fine. I want Human dominance too. But we've earned it. Humans saved the galaxy in ME1 while the other races sat back and watched the Destiny Ascension get blown up. WE'VE EARNED IT!!! We're the only race seem capable of protecting the galaxy and the other races from themselves.

#73
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages
Indeed.

Personally I prefer soft power as its effective bonuses don't diminish as quickly. The annihilation of the Council and elevating humanity to a position of power in a violent master stroke is extremely successful in the short term but provided the galaxy survives the Reaper invasion the political fallout from the coup will take decades or centuries or a series of wars to repair.

Whereas the goodwill earned from humanity leading a united galaxy against such a threat will be invaluable political capital that could potentially last generations.

But!

I have the benefit of the meta-knowledge that I'm playing a video game that I'll be able to win as a Paragon. If I was living in that world - and it was real - I wouldn't be nearly as willing to take any chances.  In fact the very first time I played Mass Effect I let the Council die because I couldn't legitimately risk the survival of every advanced race in the galaxy for the nobility of saving a few politicians.  To be perfectly honest I can't entertain any argument in favor of saving the Council in that situation that doesn't rely on outside knowledge or hindsight - there's only one responsible decision to make there, and that is to destroy Sovereign at any cost.  That's why Cerberus gets an unfair shake in my view, people are using their outside knowledge and hindsight to judge them out of context based on their own personal morality.

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 26 août 2010 - 11:10 .


#74
Barquiel

Barquiel
  • Members
  • 5 848 messages

Upsettingshorts wrote...

Indeed.

Personally I prefer soft power as its effective bonuses don't diminish as quickly. The annihilation of the Council and elevating humanity to a position of power in a violent master stroke is extremely successful in the short term but provided the galaxy survives the Reaper invasion the political fallout from the coup will take decades or centuries or a series of wars to repair.

Whereas the goodwill earned from humanity leading a united galaxy against such a threat will be invaluable political capital that could potentially last generations.


I don't blame Cerberus for that. The all-human council was Udina's glorious idea, not TIM's.

(and I think "concentrate on Sovereign" is a poor tactical decision...but that's another discussion.)

#75
Guest_My name is Legion_*

Guest_My name is Legion_*
  • Guests
I don't really see Cerberus as "racist" or specist" (whatever spelling it may. Can't be bothered, its freakin 12.32 AM) but rather as a ruthless terrorist group and a traitor to their entire race. But that is just me.