1.24?
#1
Posté 29 août 2010 - 04:24
#2
Posté 29 août 2010 - 05:09
#3
Posté 29 août 2010 - 06:51
#4
Posté 29 août 2010 - 02:40
#5
Posté 29 août 2010 - 05:09
#6
Posté 29 août 2010 - 05:52
dunniteowl
#7
Posté 29 août 2010 - 06:21
#8
Posté 29 août 2010 - 08:04
#9
Posté 29 août 2010 - 08:15
Even if it is 100% complete, it would still require all the approvals behind the scenes, etc... NWN2 is a 4+ year old game at this point.
Any returns coming from another patch will have diminished to the point where there is no business reason to sink more time/effort/money into it for Atari and Obsidian IMO.
It's not like they'll get another 10k sales because they released a patch. Now, if they'd release the equivalent of a NWN Platinum box in NA, that might generate some new income streams....
Modifié par NWN DM, 29 août 2010 - 08:15 .
#10
Posté 29 août 2010 - 08:54
#11
Posté 29 août 2010 - 08:59
#12
Posté 29 août 2010 - 09:03
#13
Posté 29 août 2010 - 10:34
I agree, with the information and announcement about NWNO, there is a sort of disconnect between that and all D&D projects on hold or in limbo. Still, it might behoove us to gather as a group and ask politely if Atari can see fit to pony up for one last patch that, as far as we're aware, was already fairly well under way prior to the lawsuit.
It couldn't hurt. The worst that they could say would be, "No." In such circumstance, we'd be no worse off than before, right?
dunniteowl
#14
Posté 30 août 2010 - 11:26
Still, if it's already done (or nearly done), it's just vindictive of them to prevent its release, IMO. Think of the players!
Modifié par The Fred, 30 août 2010 - 11:26 .
#15
Posté 30 août 2010 - 03:14
#16
Posté 30 août 2010 - 09:03
Can't remember if it was Atari or Hasbro that wanted to shut it down, but Turbine put up a fight as they were still making money off it.
#17
Posté 31 août 2010 - 01:42
dno
#18
Posté 31 août 2010 - 12:33
#19
Posté 31 août 2010 - 04:15
The Fred wrote...
Atari have something of a bad reputation around here, particularly for liking to shut things down. I think the NWN1 Premium Modules were (apparently) taken off the market at their behest, there was all that trouble with the MoW download thingy, and now it wouldn't surprise me if they get the blame for preventing new NWN2 patches (even if it *isn't* their fault). Personally, I think it'd do their reputation a world of good to look magnaminous by saying "hey, no hard feelings, have your v1.24 'cos we're actually nice people". Maybe that's just wishful thinking on my part, though.
In all honesty, I'm not sure Atari could do that if they wanted to. They are (as far as I know) still in court with Hasbro over the D&D licence. I'd be surprised if Hasbro would let Atari do anything with the licence, especially since the dispute involves Atari selling it's European operations to Namco-bandi (a Hasbro competetor) and not reassuring Hasbro that NB is not getting access to Hasbro's propriatary information.
#20
Posté 01 septembre 2010 - 11:51
See the highlighted portion of your statement. This is all being discussed in light of the announcement by Atari of their upcoming MMO (I know, I know, OMG [Online Mini-Game]) where it is pretty clear -- at least according to the interviews and information available that Atari is doing this with the oversight of WotC, which just can't happen unless Hasbro and Atari are, for some reason, not fighting any more over the license -- unless Atari somehow managed to pull a rabbit out of their hat.BardKesnit wrote...
The Fred wrote...
Atari have something of a bad reputation around here, particularly for liking to shut things down. I think the NWN1 Premium Modules were (apparently) taken off the market at their behest, there was all that trouble with the MoW download thingy, and now it wouldn't surprise me if they get the blame for preventing new NWN2 patches (even if it *isn't* their fault). Personally, I think it'd do their reputation a world of good to look magnaminous by saying "hey, no hard feelings, have your v1.24 'cos we're actually nice people". Maybe that's just wishful thinking on my part, though.
In all honesty, I'm not sure Atari could do that if they wanted to. They are (as far as I know) still in court with Hasbro over the D&D licence. I'd be surprised if Hasbro would let Atari do anything with the licence, especially since the dispute involves Atari selling it's European operations to Namco-bandi (a Hasbro competetor) and not reassuring Hasbro that NB is not getting access to Hasbro's propriatary information.
Otherwise, you could be saying something I've said several dozen times on these and the old forums since the lawsuit was filed back in December of 2009.
Just figured you should be aware of the overall context.
dunniteowl
Modifié par dunniteowl, 01 septembre 2010 - 11:52 .
#21
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 06:02
#22
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 08:42
I would be less snarky if you could hear my voice and know I am just joshing you to some degree. However, I cannot readily locate the links necessary to bring you up to speed without googling my own self that same information. So, today I'll let you do the work.
best regards,
dunniteowl





Retour en haut






