198 réponses à ce sujet

[Lotion Soronarr]

OmbradelCerberos wrote...
 "Abraham Lincoln once said: 'Who chooses security over freedom, deserves neither.'"

Erm...didn't Benjamin Franklin say that?
No matter...whoever said that...they can [censored] my [censored].

Who chooses freedom over security, deserves neither.

[snfonseka]

I generally hate Templars.

[Heretical Sound]

snfonseka wrote...

I generally hate Templars.

I know so do I. Aren't they just so unambigiuosly evil?

[snfonseka]

Adriano87 wrote...

Heretical Sound wrote...

snfonseka wrote...

I generally hate Templars.

I know so do I. Aren't they just so unambigiuosly evil?

as you have changed the meaning of evil and good, so they're evil.

I am not saying that they are evil, but they are definitely not good either....

[OmbradelCerberos]

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

OmbradelCerberos wrote...
 "Abraham Lincoln once said: 'Who chooses security over freedom, deserves neither.'"

Erm...didn't Benjamin Franklin say that?
No matter...whoever said that...they can [censored] my [censored].

Who chooses freedom over security, deserves neither.

I was simply quoting Gaider out of memory. Maybe he said that Benjamin Franklin said it and I didn't remember it right... I am sorry for that.
But I agree, what is needed is balance. You can only try to establish new liberties when you have the basis of security.

[Heretical Sound]

Adriano87 wrote...

as you have changed the meaning of evil and good, so they're evil.

I have? I can do that ... well then from now on no means yes and yes means no.

You do know I was being sarcastic? Have you read the rest of the thread? ... on second thoughts don't. 'Tis a little crazy.

Modifié par Heretical Sound, 09 septembre 2010 - 09:15 .

[nightcobra]

OmbradelCerberos wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

OmbradelCerberos wrote...
 "Abraham Lincoln once said: 'Who chooses security over freedom, deserves neither.'"

Erm...didn't Benjamin Franklin say that?
No matter...whoever said that...they can [censored] my [censored].

Who chooses freedom over security, deserves neither.

I was simply quoting Gaider out of memory. Maybe he said that Benjamin Franklin said it and I didn't remember it right... I am sorry for that.
But I agree, what is needed is balance. You can only try to establish new liberties when you have the basis of security.

balance is the way to go on this matter, difficult though it might be.

someone said it best:

"it's a pain in the ass...but well worth it":P

[Heretical Sound]

nightcobra8928 wrote...

balance is the way to go on this matter, difficult though it might be.

someone said it best:

"it's a pain in the ass...but well worth it":P

I'm not sure whether I should be disturbed or amused ... hang on I'll go flip a coin ...

Nope you're out of luck, disturbed it is.

[OmbradelCerberos]

Adriano87 wrote...

snfonseka wrote...

Adriano87 wrote...

Heretical Sound wrote...

snfonseka wrote...

I generally hate Templars.

I know so do I. Aren't they just so unambigiuosly evil?

as you have changed the meaning of evil and good, so they're evil.

I am not saying that they are evil, but they are definitely not good either....

Actually, They are Ignorant. but it seems people here consider Necromancers and Demons as Good!
I'm very sorry for people of the World but they need a universal Ethic Lesson in their Studies [and I don't want to talk about this right now, Its just the Necessity that does matter]

In my opinion they just do what they think is right, as an order, but the people inside it can have different opinions and that would be interesting to explore.
And about the demons and necromancers...Maybe people just always love the underdog?

[snfonseka]

I think the Templars in the DA:O are created using the Knight Templars (in the real world) as the base.

[-Skorpious-]

I want a Templar similar to this man in DA2 -

Modifié par -Skorpious-, 10 septembre 2010 - 05:44 .

[Kalgaleth]

The Benjamin Franklin quote doesn't refer to just living a safe life. It's the idea that you give up your essential liberty and make of yourself a slave in order to avoid risk.



Which is a detestable notion any way you look at it.



Its not freedom vs. security.



Its your essential liberty, the ability to have that choice at all.

[Lotion Soronarr]

You ALWAYS have a choice.

[OmbradelCerberos]

-Skorpious- wrote...

I want a Templar similar to this man in DA2 -

He looks badass!

But yes, it seems that the templars are based loosely on the Knight orders of the Middle Ages, though there are many differences, for example the Knight Templars were pretty much sovereign, while the Templars of Thedas have to follow the Chantry rules and are supervised by the Seekers. There are many more, but I disgress.

Thing is, with the new approval system you won't have to like or always agree with a templar companion, if you don't like them at all, but you could have some sort of rivalry with them. I would like to see that.

[OmbradelCerberos]

So judging by the new trailer, the new tempalrs look awesome, much more menacing than in Origins, maybe because they lost the huuuge shoulder pads?

I just hope this doesn't mean that there are less funny templars around...

[errant_knight]

OmbradelCerberos wrote...

So judging by the new trailer, the new tempalrs look awesome, much more menacing than in Origins, maybe because they lost the huuuge shoulder pads?
I just hope this doesn't mean that there are less funny templars around...

Indeed! And I very much hope that not only can we have a templar companion, but learn the skills ourselves.

[OmbradelCerberos]

errant_knight wrote...

OmbradelCerberos wrote...

So judging by the new trailer, the new tempalrs look awesome, much more menacing than in Origins, maybe because they lost the huuuge shoulder pads?
I just hope this doesn't mean that there are less funny templars around...

Indeed! And I very much hope that not only can we have a templar companion, but learn the skills ourselves.

Me too, the templar skills in DA:O were very practical, so I think my warrior will be a templar again in DA2.

[Riona45]

OmbradelCerberos wrote...

So judging by the new trailer, the new tempalrs look awesome, much more menacing than in Origins, maybe because they lost the huuuge shoulder pads?
I just hope this doesn't mean that there are less funny templars around...

Most templars in DA:O weren't "funny," even if they were nice.

[Sable Rhapsody]

Riona45 wrote...

Most templars in DA:O weren't "funny," even if they were nice.

Maybe it's referring to Alistair?

Breaking Cullen's brain was pretty funny in a cruel, disturbing, uncomfortable laughter sort of way.  Or I'm just a bad person.  Probably the latter.

[Riona45]

Sable Rhapsody wrote...

Riona45 wrote...

Most templars in DA:O weren't "funny," even if they were nice.

Maybe it's referring to Alistair?

Breaking Cullen's brain was pretty funny in a cruel, disturbing, uncomfortable laughter sort of way.  Or I'm just a bad person.  Probably the latter.

Heh.

Well, there was Bran in the mage origin, who had a very dry sense of humor.  And I could kind of see it in Hadley too, although I think of him as more "straight man" material (the guy who gets teased, not the kind doing the teasing).  Other than that, (if you don't count Alistair), I honestly can't think of any templars I would describe as "funny."

[Dasher10]

I'm going to guess that Casandra is going to be a party member for the second half of the game. it's just a hunch