No argument there, that's the silliest side quest. Only a complete air-head of a Warden would not immediately realize they're being played. And I didn't like that the apostate sidequest goes from finding them to unavoidably killing them. There should have been a dialogue option, like when you track down the group in Origins who are on their way to report a blood mage to the Chantry.Ken555 wrote...
So of course Origins will have richer side -quests, but I have to agree with you that the Blight Orphans did not help at all.
Anybody else think awakening's quality was way lower than DAO?
#26
Posté 03 septembre 2010 - 04:18
#27
Posté 03 septembre 2010 - 05:14
The characters just don't seem as deep as in origins, and the new dialogue system is annoying at times, a better idea would've been to have a mix of the new system and origins. At least having some dialogue from them could've added some depth to the new characters.
Overall it was okay, definitely overpriced, but just seemed lacking compared to origins in many ways, the depth just wasn't there.
#28
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 07:36
Awakening's decisions reminded me of some of the ones you had to make in the original Mass Effect, while reflecting some of the spookiness of the Ozammar/Anvil of the Void overall feel.
#29
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 07:55
#30
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 12:36
night0205 wrote...
Dragon Age Origins is a complete game... and Awakening is an expansion of that game... so yes the quality is not as good...
It's more the bugs and lack of testing that take away from it, you can tell it was rushed out the door as fast as possible to maximize profits. The fact that it's an expansion shouldn't make any difference in quality, if anything it should be better since it's shorter and smaller than origins and they should've had more time to polish it and get the bugs out.
#31
Posté 05 septembre 2010 - 03:24
kinda like that scene in resevoir dogs where he starts off with a HUGE tip for the waitress but takes some back here and there as his meal progressed LOL
#32
Posté 05 septembre 2010 - 04:46
But don't get me wrong, Awakening was an awesome expansion.
However compared to the epicness of Origins...ehhhh I don't think so.
The companions are boring, and there aint much depth into them (Anders was really close though).
The Joining ritual was repeated WAAYYY too much and doesn't feel as special and unique as in the first game.
But one thing that really killed me was there was just too much random-lengthy fightings that doesnt feel rewarding
#33
Posté 05 septembre 2010 - 07:12
#34
Posté 05 septembre 2010 - 07:25
True, but what most people would agree with is that it had the potential to be better. It was an expansion better than a lot of other games, but it could have been better .night0205 wrote...
Awakening is buggy/glitchy I give you that, and it is not as epic/deep/detailed as origins, but it's still far better then most whole games that are released today, and again, it's a expansion.
#35
Posté 05 septembre 2010 - 10:14
#36
Posté 05 septembre 2010 - 11:39
#37
Posté 05 septembre 2010 - 11:57
#38
Posté 05 septembre 2010 - 01:33
#39
Posté 05 septembre 2010 - 01:49
The problem with Dragon Age in general is the bugs. It's not acceptable that there are so many of them. After all this time, my game still crashed 3 times in Lothering last night (and no there's nothing wrong with my computer). There are still memory leaks and skills that don't quite work. It's not good enough, and it doesn't live up to the standard of other Bioware games (I'm not claiming they are bug-free btw).
One last point. It has already been said in this thread, but it's sad that Awakening doesn't update Origins with the new specializations and skills/talents. It doesn't matter that some of them are only available at level 20, because you do in fact reach level 20 and beyond in Origins. To me it's kind of lazy to update the system but not allow those updates in the main game.
#40
Posté 05 septembre 2010 - 03:08
Perhaps. Although I will say that the unusually high release-date price for this add-on didn't help temper my expectations. I don't care about other companies and other games. When I see Bioware's name on a product, and that product costs $40, I expect something really good. Because that's been their history for 10+ years without fail... until Awakening.termokanden wrote...
I think people are expecting too much from Awakening when it's just an expansion. Compared to the other DLC, it seems you get a lot more for your money. Certainly also when you compare it to DLC for other games.
And I disagree with the bang for your buck argument. I only paid about $7 for the Lilianna's Song DLC and was much more satisfied with it. Unlike Awakening, Lilianna's Song acquitted its pricetag
Overall I'd say, Awakenings was rushed, unbalanced... and there was something... odd.... about the pacing of it. The story itself was superb, however, but one strong point in a sea of weakpoints does not make a game good.
Modifié par Yrkoon, 06 septembre 2010 - 12:44 .
#41
Posté 05 septembre 2010 - 03:38
s0meguy6665 wrote...
So I played awakening, thinking i was going to have an experience of similar high quality to DAO. But i was really disappointed. The dialogue is crappy, oghren is reduced to (bad, cliche) comedic relief and the storyline is very shallow. i couldn't play more than a few hours, i was pretty disillusioned when i went from DAO to awakenings. but i don't see this sentiment expressed by many other people. Please show me some sign this isn't what satisfies bioware fans and gamers in general these days.
I complete agree. Awakenings was a huge let-down. How it could be rated "best expansion" by some gamingmagazine, I forget which, goes to prove how much in the pockets of the producers these magazines are. I felt robbed.
#42
Posté 05 septembre 2010 - 05:03
night0205 wrote...
... and again, it's a expansion.
So what? There are expansions to other games that are >>> Awakening in terms of length, story, romance etc., pretty much everything Awakening is lacking. Even for such a small game they managed to bring so many bugs in, which clearly shows how rushed DA:A is.
I'm also really disappointed about Awakening. I made a post about this regarding the keep (management) in Awakening. social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/127/index/2530907
#43
Posté 05 septembre 2010 - 09:33
Not to say it's a bad game, it's got all the original DAO components there but I think it would have been much better off if the game story as well as all the changes to skills, spells, stats, were all integrated with the original game rather than a stand alone.
#44
Guest_Spuudle_*
Posté 05 septembre 2010 - 09:41
Guest_Spuudle_*
termokanden wrote...
I think people are expecting too much from Awakening when it's just an expansion. Compared to the other DLC, it seems you get a lot more for your money. Certainly also when you compare it to DLC for other games.
The problem with Dragon Age in general is the bugs. It's not acceptable that there are so many of them. After all this time, my game still crashed 3 times in Lothering last night (and no there's nothing wrong with my computer). There are still memory leaks and skills that don't quite work. It's not good enough, and it doesn't live up to the standard of other Bioware games (I'm not claiming they are bug-free btw).
One last point. It has already been said in this thread, but it's sad that Awakening doesn't update Origins with the new specializations and skills/talents. It doesn't matter that some of them are only available at level 20, because you do in fact reach level 20 and beyond in Origins. To me it's kind of lazy to update the system but not allow those updates in the main game.
I agree with you about expecting too much. However, I understand why people have/and do, when this particular one is priced so highly. Also, although I have just got a new PC for my gaming this week, I am to date an xbox360 player. In all this time I have never had a game crash on me, until DA:O 5 times, and Awakening 3 times. I initially panicked, fearing RROD. It was the game and not the machine though.......unusual
#45
Posté 06 septembre 2010 - 03:14
termokanden wrote...
I think people are expecting too much from Awakening when it's just an expansion. Compared to the other DLC, it seems you get a lot more for your money. Certainly also when you compare it to DLC for other games.
Hordes of the Underdark, Mask of Betrayer are also expansions and they
are actually good, feel like you are begining a new journey.
termokanden wrote...
The problem with Dragon Age in general is the bugs. It's not acceptable
that there are so many of them. After all this time, my game still
crashed 3 times in Lothering last night (and no there's nothing wrong
with my computer). There are still memory leaks and skills that don't
quite work. It's not good enough, and it doesn't live up to the standard
of other Bioware games (I'm not claiming they are bug-free btw).
One
last point. It has already been said in this thread, but it's sad that
Awakening doesn't update Origins with the new specializations and
skills/talents. It doesn't matter that some of them are only available
at level 20, because you do in fact reach level 20 and beyond in
Origins. To me it's kind of lazy to update the system but not allow
those updates in the main game.
I totally agree with you !
#46
Posté 06 septembre 2010 - 01:17
Spuudle wrote...
I agree with you about expecting too much. However, I understand why people have/and do, when this particular one is priced so highly. Also, although I have just got a new PC for my gaming this week, I am to date an xbox360 player. In all this time I have never had a game crash on me, until DA:O 5 times, and Awakening 3 times. I initially panicked, fearing RROD. It was the game and not the machine though.......unusual
Regarding the price, I may be too used to expensive DLC with absolutely no content. So for me Awakening is far above average with regards to what you actually get for your money. Then again, I don't really care much about the price. Time investment > money investment. I bet it is for most people that actually have the time to play such a game.
As for the bugs. Had to give up playing my mage since my spells seem to crash the game often enough that it has become very annoying. Have the crashes actually become MORE frequent?
#47
Guest_Spuudle_*
Posté 06 septembre 2010 - 01:43
Guest_Spuudle_*
termokanden wrote...
Spuudle wrote...
I agree with you about expecting too much. However, I understand why people have/and do, when this particular one is priced so highly. Also, although I have just got a new PC for my gaming this week, I am to date an xbox360 player. In all this time I have never had a game crash on me, until DA:O 5 times, and Awakening 3 times. I initially panicked, fearing RROD. It was the game and not the machine though.......unusual
Regarding the price, I may be too used to expensive DLC with absolutely no content. So for me Awakening is far above average with regards to what you actually get for your money. Then again, I don't really care much about the price. Time investment > money investment. I bet it is for most people that actually have the time to play such a game.
As for the bugs. Had to give up playing my mage since my spells seem to crash the game often enough that it has become very annoying. Have the crashes actually become MORE frequent?
With regard to pricing, I dont compare with dlc of other games only with that from Bioware. The average seems to be between 400msp and 560 msp, for DA:O and the Mass Effect series. My point is that when you are asking for 2000msp's extra (£20.00 sterling), people are going to, quite naturally, expect a bit more. I dont know what dlc you have been buying, but above average for the price? In the uk, (didnt know this at the time) you can get awakening on disk for £6.99. In this respect, awakening is miles better than average for the price. For 2400msp, not so much, sadly.
#48
Posté 06 septembre 2010 - 01:56
But it's not limited to MW2. There's plenty of expensive DLC with almost no content out there, sadly.
Again, I don't care so much about the price myself. I'd pay for a DLC to fix the bugs so I feel less stupid for investing so much time in this game.
If you just want to talk about DAO DLC, sure. Warden's Keep is cheap but it's very quickly over. Golems of Amgarrak was quite poor if you asked me. Return to Ostagar was too short. The darkspawn DLC was horrible - same areas as before, BUGS, boring playing a vanguard. You don't get a whole lot for your money here!
I should mention that I very much like Shale and Leliana's Song.
Modifié par termokanden, 06 septembre 2010 - 02:03 .
#49
Guest_Spuudle_*
Posté 06 septembre 2010 - 02:05
Guest_Spuudle_*
termokanden wrote...
Perhaps the most infamous is Modern Warfare 2 with its expensive map packs containing just a few new maps each and a couple of maps from the previous game.
But it's not limited to MW2. There's plenty of expensive DLC with almost no content out there, sadly.
Again, I don't care so much about the price myself. I'd pay for a DLC to fix the bugs so I feel less stupid for investing so much time in this game.
Of course, a fair point. And i'm not generally concerned with price either. However, you just took 'part' of the original quote and I responded accordingly. Most people I suspect dont really concern themselves with the price but this particular dlc is a bit of an exception. Again, I dont think its rocket science to understand why some people expected more from this against the price paid. Aside from some on budgets with family, it is also a quality issue.
#50
Guest_Spuudle_*
Posté 06 septembre 2010 - 02:09
Guest_Spuudle_*





Retour en haut






