67 réponses à ce sujet

[Kyda]

Eudaemonium wrote...

Anomen grows on you like a fungal infection.

LOL!

[Yobani_P]

I don't see any problem that Nathaniel spend a happy time with  Lady hawke:wub: before my lady cousland kill him:devil:

but seriously, i don't think this option gonna be posibble^_^

Modifié par Yobani_P, 04 septembre 2010 - 12:06 .

[Addai]

On the podcast, Gaider just said there will be hit it and quit it romance possibilities in DA2.



Drop those drawers, Howe!

[Tequitos]

Addai67 wrote...

On the podcast, Gaider just said there will be hit it and quit it romance possibilities in DA2.

Drop those drawers, Howe!

That sounds like a Leliana/Morrigan Love Triangle, maybe even Zevran.

Hit it and quit it, sounds good.

[Funny_chan]

I believe he will be a romance option. Just look at what David Gaider wrote in a thread I created when DA2 was just announced:

social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/141/index/3083505/2#3089892

David Gaider -

"I like Nathaniel. So stoic.



I think he would have been my choice for Awakening romance, had we done them."

Modifié par Funny_chan, 04 septembre 2010 - 06:07 .

[OmbradelCerberos]

Funny_chan wrote...

I believe he will be a romance option. Just look at what David Gaider wrote in a thread I created when DA2 was just announced:

social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/141/index/3083505/2#3089892

David Gaider -

"I like Nathaniel. So stoic.



I think he would have been my choice for Awakening romance, had we done them."

Well, that sounds good.
I also loved his banter with Sigrun, so yeah getting Nate as a love interest would be nice.

[Riona45]

Eudaemonium wrote...


Anomen grows on you like a fungal infection.

YMMV.  I enjoyed the character.

With regards to Nathaniel, I'm just happy to get to see him again and possibly travel with him.  On one hand, I'd love to romance him, but on the other hand, I don't think it's optimal to have Hawke romance him, necessarily.  After all, he eventually leaves Kirkwall and heads back to Ferelden.

[Riona45]

Funny_chan wrote...

I believe he will be a romance option. Just look at what David Gaider wrote in a thread I created when DA2 was just announced:

social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/141/index/3083505/2#3089892

David Gaider -

"I like Nathaniel. So stoic.



I think he would have been my choice for Awakening romance, had we done them."

That doesn't even imply that he'll be a romance option in DA2, though.

[Spinnazie]

Nathaniel is killable in Awakening, he won't be a companion or romance.



Cameo is a possibility, but that's about it.

[Riona45]

Spin****e wrote...

Nathaniel is killable in Awakening, he won't be a companion or romance.

Cameo is a possibility, but that's about it.

If a cameo is a possibility, temporary companion is as well.

Remember, the timelines of DA:O/A and DA2 are supposed to overlap with each other.

[OmbradelCerberos]

Spin****e wrote...

Nathaniel is killable in Awakening, he won't be a companion or romance.

Cameo is a possibility, but that's about it.

You are aware that Nate was in Kirkwall before the events of Awakening?
He might be a temp companion.

[Addai]

Spin****e wrote...

Nathaniel is killable in Awakening, he won't be a companion or romance.

Cameo is a possibility, but that's about it.

Gaider has confirmed both temporary companions and hit-it-and-quit-it romances, so the fact that Nate was in Kirkwall for all of the Blight makes this a possibility.  There are about 2 years between the time Lothering falls and the events of Awakening.

Edit:  How funny that the forum censors your login name because it contains the 4 letters spelling those fascist Germans of yore.

Modifié par Addai67, 05 septembre 2010 - 12:58 .

[Addai]

Dalira Montanti wrote...

Addai67 wrote...

On the podcast, Gaider just said there will be hit it and quit it romance possibilities in DA2.

Drop those drawers, Howe!

do you mean like hi i love you then have some  cutscenes later i dont love you bye?

thats kinda wired

No, like "hi you're hot, let's do it, see you later."  Why is that weird?  Happens all the time, and more often in video games.

In fact, since Gaider also dropped a Witcher reference in the same remarks, I figure that's pretty much how it will work.  In The Witcher, Geralt meets a woman, saves her, nails her and probably never sees her again.

Modifié par Addai67, 05 septembre 2010 - 12:59 .

[MelRedux]

kgaustad wrote...

 Sorry if this is already a thread....please lockdown if it is.
I was looking at the thread of Nathaniel in DA2 and was thinking I wonder if he will be one of the options?

Maker, I sure hope so.  Even if it is jsut a roll in the hay...I'll take it!  I need to get out all my pent up frustration from Awakening.

[A71C3]

Mel_Redux wrote...
Maker, I sure hope so.  Even if it is jsut a roll in the hay...I'll take it!  I need to get out all my pent up frustration from Awakening.

Ditto! If not a romanceable option then I hope at least we could learn more about the broody Howe. Awakening left little to work with.

[kgaustad]

Maybe I have this wrong but in Awakening I don't think that he ever stated how long he was in the Free Marches.

[Arrtis]

kgaustad wrote...

 Sorry if this is already a thread....please lockdown if it is.
I was looking at the thread of Nathaniel in DA2 and was thinking I wonder if he will be one of the options?

according to him he did not chase skirts.
He scouted and stole or something...

[kgaustad]

He may not have chased skirts, but what if they chased him?

[wicked_being]

Well that's gonna be awkward. Like what if it was LadyHawke who tells him to go back to Amaranthine for the sake of his family only to be executed by my warden. Nice.

[kgaustad]

But not everyone executes him. I wonder if the skirts chasing him are a cousin to the shleets?

[Arrtis]

He says it in a way that says I was not enjoying myself in the free marches I was learning and training to become stronger...

[kgaustad]

Arrtis wrote...

He says it in a way that says I was not enjoying myself in the free marches I was learning and training to become stronger...

That could mean  a variety of things.....he may not have been enjoying being there not knowing what was happening at home....he could have been missing his family etc.  I guess all will be answered March 8, 2011.

[A71C3]

kgaustad wrote...
Maybe I have this wrong but in Awakening I don't think that he ever stated how long he was in the Free Marches.

At one point in the game, Nate states that he had been in the Free Marches for eight years.  I can whip up the dialogue if you want.

[kgaustad]

A71C3 wrote...

kgaustad wrote...
Maybe I have this wrong but in Awakening I don't think that he ever stated how long he was in the Free Marches.

At one point in the game, Nate states that he had been in the Free Marches for eight years.  I can whip up the dialogue if you want.

Thank You I had forgotten that part.  I am really starting to think that Nate will be one of the first companions you get the more I think about it....besides Bethany of course.