Bryy_Miller wrote...
Hawke's mage robes look identical to the apprentice robes in DA:O.
Bryy_Miller wrote...
WilliamShatner wrote...
Leliana and Morrigan are far more essential to a DA game being a DA game than ****ing Sandel!!!
Nug bombs....in or out?David Gaider wrote...
WilliamShatner wrote...
Leliana and Morrigan are far more essential to a DA game being a DA game than ****ing Sandel!!!
Riiight. Because clearly what I meant was that Sandal was more important than anyone else and will appear in exclusion to anyone else as well.
Interpret much?
Modifié par Arttis, 05 septembre 2010 - 02:26 .
Lord Gremlin wrote...
Many people believe that Sandal is the most important character in DA, Mr. Gaider. What happened at fort Drakon anyway?
It's an answer without question:?SDNcN wrote...
Enchantment!
Lord Gremlin wrote...
It's an answer without question:?SDNcN wrote...
Enchantment!
In a moment like this one should gather one's courage, embrace one's destiny and answer The main question about Dragon Age:UberDuber wrote...
So they bring back Sandel, but forget about all the stuff that made Dragon age...Dragon age!?! Wtf!!!!!.....Hmmmm....
Lord Gremlin wrote...
In a moment like this one should gather one's courage, embrace one's destiny and answer The main question about Dragon Age:UberDuber wrote...
So they bring back Sandel, but forget about all the stuff that made Dragon age...Dragon age!?! Wtf!!!!!.....Hmmmm....
Enchantment?
They can put it in for consoles, but so far they think not having it is working fine.Beerfish wrote...
"At this time no console auto attack - PC retains it's auto attack for definite."
What exactly does this mean?
Sandel is the only thing we have left of the old DA...hold onto him tightly, and never let go.Lord Gremlin wrote...
In a moment like this one should gather one's courage, embrace one's destiny and answer The main question about Dragon Age:UberDuber wrote...
So they bring back Sandel, but forget about all the stuff that made Dragon age...Dragon age!?! Wtf!!!!!.....Hmmmm....
Enchantment?
David Gaider wrote...
WilliamShatner wrote...
Leliana and Morrigan are far more essential to a DA game being a DA game than ****ing Sandel!!!
Riiight. Because clearly what I meant was that Sandal was more important than anyone else and will appear in exclusion to anyone else as well.
Interpret much?
Modifié par WilliamShatner, 05 septembre 2010 - 03:11 .
SirOccam wrote...
They can put it in for consoles, but so far they think not having it is working fine.Beerfish wrote...
"At this time no console auto attack - PC retains it's auto attack for definite."
What exactly does this mean?
It means attacking automatically, as in...if auto attack is on, the character will sit there and attack until auto attack is turned off. Like a basic melee attack, not abilities/talents (if you're controlling him/her).Beerfish wrote...
SirOccam wrote...
They can put it in for consoles, but so far they think not having it is working fine.Beerfish wrote...
"At this time no console auto attack - PC retains it's auto attack for definite."
What exactly does this mean?
What is "it". What are they defining as auto attack? Just attacking on site as one of the tactics?
I wouldn't sugest people to take what DG said about Sandal to seriously. That sounded too much like a joke.WilliamShatner wrote...
David Gaider wrote...
WilliamShatner wrote...
Leliana and Morrigan are far more essential to a DA game being a DA game than ****ing Sandel!!!
Riiight. Because clearly what I meant was that Sandal was more important than anyone else and will appear in exclusion to anyone else as well.
Interpret much?
My post was mostly in jest as I suspect your comment on ustream was.
However,
If I recall correctly you said we wouldn't see Sten in DA2. So there is one companion who has been confirmed as being excluded. Now there are a lot of people who would say "It isn't DA without Sten!" yet they'll be left holding their shiskabobs while Sandal, a far lesser character than Sten, has been granted a "it isn't DA without Sandal" tag by BioWare themselves.
If you said nothing of the sort about Sten and my mind is playing tricks on me please ignore the above paragraph.
I really don't know what to think about that.marquiseondore wrote...
I haven't seen this posted yet...
Behold the skill and/or talent tree
WTF IS THAT!? F*CKING DOT 2 DOT???marquiseondore wrote...
I haven't seen this posted yet...
Behold the skill and/or talent tree
WilliamShatner wrote...
David Gaider wrote...
WilliamShatner wrote...
Leliana and Morrigan are far more essential to a DA game being a DA game than ****ing Sandel!!!
Riiight. Because clearly what I meant was that Sandal was more important than anyone else and will appear in exclusion to anyone else as well.
Interpret much?
My post was mostly in jest as I suspect your comment on ustream was.
However,
If I recall correctly you said we wouldn't see Sten in DA2. So there is one companion who has been confirmed as being excluded. Now there are a lot of people who would say "It isn't DA without Sten!" yet they'll be left holding their shiskabobs while Sandal, a far lesser character than Sten, has been granted a "it isn't DA without Sandal" tag by BioWare themselves.
If you said nothing of the sort about Sten and my mind is playing tricks on me please ignore the above paragraph.
marquiseondore wrote...
I haven't seen this posted yet...
Behold the skill and/or talent tree
BP20125810 wrote...
I think it's the small things that make Dragon Age great. Like the way the party reacts to your roances. Those are the best dialogues. And having a sister and mother around can only provide for more hilarious banter.
Sneelonz wrote...
Bryy_Miller wrote...
Hawke's mage robes look identical to the apprentice robes in DA:O.