Why do non-romanceable characters receive less fanfare?
#1
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 02:30
If a character doesn't have a romance or the suggestion of one, discussion about them falls by the wayside, even if people really like that character. Best examples are Mordin and Wrex. Everyone loves them, but no one seems to want to talk about them.
Are romances part of a character's appeal? Or perhaps it's just because romances give us more to discuss?
#2
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 02:31
[Edit: Done! - Pacifien]
Modifié par Pacifien, 04 septembre 2010 - 02:38 .
#3
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 02:37
Anyway, people get more attached to those they boink.
#4
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 02:41
#5
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 02:41
AntiChri5 wrote...
This might as well be the right forum.
Anyway, people get more attached to those they boink.
True... but I felt pretty attached to Mordin, for example. His sordid past gives the fan community plenty to talk about.
#6
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 02:45
theelementslayer wrote...
Personally I dont know why but I think AntiChri is right, sadly. However my fav character is still Samara, but thats because I almost boinked her. In all seriousness though they probably feel more attached because sex does that, even if it is virtual.
Exactly. Samara is the best example of this. She dresses in such a manner that, had it not been the "Code" that she adheres to, she probably would have had little problem engaging in any sort of romance, even though she officially doesn't have one.
#7
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 02:51
XX55XX wrote...
theelementslayer wrote...
Personally I dont know why but I think AntiChri is right, sadly. However my fav character is still Samara, but thats because I almost boinked her. In all seriousness though they probably feel more attached because sex does that, even if it is virtual.
Exactly. Samara is the best example of this. She dresses in such a manner that, had it not been the "Code" that she adheres to, she probably would have had little problem engaging in any sort of romance, even though she officially doesn't have one.
Well the reason for Samara is my shep acts exactly like her. She is ruthless and will never let justice leave. Though I will sacrifice 100 to save a million. I respected Samara though, and she just felt the most personal of them all, she was bound by her code and she stuck to it. Back to your point it might also have to do with the actual thing that people want the sex. They dont talk to the non romance characters. Probably at least 70% of the guys tried to romance Miri and talked to her ALOT. Samara probably not so much if you understand my point. This means they wouldnt get to actually know them. Its exactly like the Jack haters. because of her beginning personality they dont talk to her at all and actually understand her.
#8
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 03:09
My favorite squadmate so far has been Garrus. Sure, they made him romanceable in ME2 but since my Shepard is a straight male, that wasn't part of his 'cool' factor. On a side note I'm not sure why anyone would want to romance Garrus. He's an awesome character, but he's Turian! He's got avian features and a metal exoskeleton. I think the people who romanced Garrus would also 'romance' a Varren. I guess for those players there is no mystery on how scale itch got aboard.
#9
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 03:12
For instance, a discussion about Garrus's decision with Sidonis or how the Turian military works will likely be found in the Garrus thread. But a discussion about the genophage or the Salarian STG will have their own threads versus being thrown in with the Mordin thread. Same with Legion's loyalty mission or discussion about the Geth, that seems to get discussed outside of Legion's character thread.
Plus, keeping a thread going for any length of time takes a certain dedication that apparently only the romance characters tend evoke. I started a Grunt thread, 'cause he's awesome, but I don't feel compelled to come up with conversation topics about him to keep his thread going. I mean, I've come up with a couple topics, but others have to bring their contributions to it as well. They just don't.
Modifié par Pacifien, 04 septembre 2010 - 03:12 .
#10
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 04:04
#11
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 04:18
Really? Because all garrus told me was that he just had to get those calibrations done.OniGanon wrote...
Maybe it's because the only way to get a decent amount of conversation out of anyone in the crew is to romance them.
I use Mordin as the standard by which the amount of dialogue should start with the squadmates. I think he has more unique conversation points as well as a rotating collection of "go away" responses than anyone else on the ship. But, you know, since he declines Shepard's advances ever so subtly, no one wants to talk about him.
#12
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 04:39
#13
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 04:56
you never see people in a thread chatting about how awesome the sun is and how they hope its going to come up over the horizon next moring.
As long as people exist who don't like a character, the people who do will feel a need to shout them down. well thats my theory anyway. though it doesn't explain Garrus thread, cause who doesn't like garrus?
#14
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 06:02
Modifié par Water Dumple, 04 septembre 2010 - 06:03 .
#15
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 09:21
#16
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 10:02
I suspect most of the concern about having the LIs playing major roles in ME3 is because (for many of us) they are an important part of Shepard's story. If Bioware was designing a new game in the same universe NOT including Shepard, I suspect people would be more likely to support characters like Mordin and Wrex.
#17
Posté 04 septembre 2010 - 05:22
Pacifien is right on the topic association though. Certain issues could dissociated from the character and discussed independently. (Plus given forum rules, those issues may end up deviating from the character thread...)
#18
Posté 05 septembre 2010 - 04:56
The others, to me, not so much. Jack's past, well you pretty much deal with that. Miranda's... it's probably full of perfect and boring. Garrus, he and Tali are both known already and neither have much that interests me. Grunt has no past; Legion is a computer. Thane might have some good stories about how he crawled through ducts to get to his targets, but that would get old fast.
LI's are great. I crushed on Miri. But, for me, an LI is not enough to warrant discussing ad nauseum so i've never joined the massive support threads.
I'd be more interested in back stories/dlc/missions that filled out the above four.
#19
Posté 05 septembre 2010 - 05:09
#20
Posté 05 septembre 2010 - 05:20
I think that trust is more important than who you end up banging at the end of the day IMHO





Retour en haut







