Seifz wrote...
SirOccam wrote...
Seifz wrote...
The difference between porn and not porn shouldn't be how much nudity, or what kind of nudity, or what acts are acceptable. Pornography is made for a specific purpose (sexual arrousal). Other films are made for other purposes (to tell a story, to educate). They shouldn't be labeled "porn" just because they show a penis or some doggy-style sex.
No, but deciding "hmm, we should show them doing it doggy-style" doesn't really sound like "story" is the first thing on their minds. Now it's not impossible that a certain position might have an effect on a story, but it's not (or at least shouldn't be) a common thing. Same with closeups of genitalia or just excessive detail in general. I mean...some things are best left to the imagination. This is where subtlety and nuance come into it.
If you want to keep living in a fantasy world where everyone has sex missionary style, nobody has any fetishes, and genitalia is something of the imagination, then by all means.
Okay, then you tell me: how does showing fetishes or inventive sex positions add to the story? It's obvious that such things are put in only to titillate the viewer. And that is precisely what makes porn porn.
I never said no one on Thedas is allowed to have fetishes or prefer exotic positions. But there's a difference between disallowing the possibility of their existence and not needing to see it.
I fail to see how "these characters are having sex, right now, on your screen" is subtle in any way. If you want subtle, then you cut out before the sex happens. If you're going to show sex, then show sex. Don't show half-sex. That's my point.
Well, that's sort of the textbook definition of "subtle." The whole idea is to convey action without showing every last bit in garish detail. Showing that they're having sex without having to actually show the penis entering the vagina; that is subtlety. How you can argue against such a thing seriously boggles my mind.
I suppose if a character in a movie has to go to the bathroom, you think we need to see the poop actually coming out?
(Eww. Sorry for being gross everyone.)
I don't care what position they're in, or how close up you get, and that's the whole idea. It shouldn't matter! These restrictions on positions and camera angle and body parts are just stupid. Sex is sex. End.
I'm all for eschewing unreasonable censorship, but this is a little insane. This type of "censorship" isn't unreasonable. There is such a thing as "too much information" in movies and games and stories of all kinds. If a story calls for two characters to have sex, then by all means include it. But it's not necessary to show every last pore on their skin to get the point across. It's called being tasteful.
Modifié par SirOccam, 07 septembre 2010 - 12:51 .