Allow me to put it this way. I despise "conspiracy theories" (for the want of a better phrase). Nonetheless, I've found the difference in quality between DLC for DA:O and ME2 to be so vast that I have wondered if this is a form of market research by Bioware to see if a comparable number of players will buy DLC regardless of quality. If similar numbers buy DA:O and ME2 DLC, well, maybe all the money and effort that went into crafting beautiful new areas for ME2 DLC could have been used elsewhere, since people would have bought it even if it used recycled areas (as in DA:O DLC). I mean, *I* bought all story DLC for both games, in spite of noticing the difference fairly early; lots of other people could have done the same.
I don't like thinking this, but the thought arises nonetheless. After all, IIRC, Bioware are still in the process of figuring out their DLC model for the future. This could be seen as a legitimate way of helping them to do that. The main thing that really makes me think that my musings here aren't likely to reflect reality is knowing how much the Dragon Age team cares for its creations. But one can care for one's creations as much as one likes, and still not get a higher budget for presenting further elaborations of one's (originally awesome) story.
Regardless, I sincerely hope that DLC for DA2 is of a higher quality than what was released for DA:O.
Modifié par Estelindis, 10 septembre 2010 - 10:17 .