Modifié par Aradace, 13 septembre 2010 - 05:25 .
Is Lady Hawke fertile/Can we have children?
#301
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 05:25
#302
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 05:26
Aradace wrote...
Why does this have to be brought up ALL
THE TIME? Seriously, this isnt Fable II or III and in all honesty,
that's where "having babies" needs to stay IMO. That would actually be a
deal breaker with me at this point if ME3 or DA2 allowed you to have
kids. I dont have and/or want kids IRL....Why in the nine hells would I
want them in a game? lol
Ever thought that OTHERS might like adding depth and drama to the storyline with the option of offspring? And why must Fable be thrown everywhere? Those who do suggest this kind of thing have faith that Bioware could pull it off quite well.
Modifié par Russalka, 13 septembre 2010 - 05:28 .
#303
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 05:27
#304
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 05:28
Aradace wrote...
Why does this have to be brought up ALL THE TIME? Seriously, this isnt Fable II or III and in all honesty, that's where "having babies" needs to stay IMO. That would actually be a deal breaker with me at this point if ME3 or DA2 allowed you to have kids. I dont have and/or want kids IRL....Why in the nine hells would I want them in a game? lol
I don't think anyone is arguing that it be mandatory. They're just saying it would be an interesting option that could have fun consequences in the story. Clearly it's not for everyone, but that's how options work.
#305
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 05:30
HopHazzard wrote...
Aradace wrote...
Why does this have to be brought up ALL THE TIME? Seriously, this isnt Fable II or III and in all honesty, that's where "having babies" needs to stay IMO. That would actually be a deal breaker with me at this point if ME3 or DA2 allowed you to have kids. I dont have and/or want kids IRL....Why in the nine hells would I want them in a game? lol
I don't think anyone is arguing that it be mandatory. They're just saying it would be an interesting option that could have fun consequences in the story. Clearly it's not for everyone, but that's how options work.
QTF
#306
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 05:31
#307
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 05:33
Enchantment won't prevent babies. You'll just have retarded children such as Sandal.nightcobra8928 wrote...
zero.squall wrote...
They do have condoms in Thedas, don't they?
nah, but just put an enchantment on it and you'll be fine:devil:
#308
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 05:34
Aradace wrote...
As long as it's an "option" sure I suppose. But again, like Fable, a form of "contraceptive" would need to be available for me to be ok with it. Otherwise, it would most likely have me being "single" through the entirety of the game.
fable is a really bad example of how a romance and becoming a parent can be implemented in a videogame, even old rpgs used it better even though they were part of the story like in lufia2 and others.
#309
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 05:38
nightcobra8928 wrote...
Aradace wrote...
As long as it's an "option" sure I suppose. But again, like Fable, a form of "contraceptive" would need to be available for me to be ok with it. Otherwise, it would most likely have me being "single" through the entirety of the game.
fable is a really bad example of how a romance and becoming a parent can be implemented in a videogame, even old rpgs used it better even though they were part of the story like in lufia2 and others.
Honestly, it's not a fear of bad implementation that turns me off to the whole idea. As I said, it's the thought of having children as a whole. Dont want'em IRL much less in a video game. But as long as the "option" to not have a child was on the table and DIDNT interfere with relationships as a whole in the game then it MIGHT not be so bad. Seriously, Im the type of person that if this were in game, and no obvious indicator was present to warn me that my LI became pregnant and all of a sudden BAM out pops a child, I would seriously delete my data and start over from scratch....Either that or just sacrafice the child to the dark spawn as a snack, whichever one I had the option to do first
#310
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 05:41
Aradace wrote...
nightcobra8928 wrote...
Aradace wrote...
As long as it's an "option" sure I suppose. But again, like Fable, a form of "contraceptive" would need to be available for me to be ok with it. Otherwise, it would most likely have me being "single" through the entirety of the game.
fable is a really bad example of how a romance and becoming a parent can be implemented in a videogame, even old rpgs used it better even though they were part of the story like in lufia2 and others.
Honestly, it's not a fear of bad implementation that turns me off to the whole idea. As I said, it's the thought of having children as a whole. Dont want'em IRL much less in a video game. But as long as the "option" to not have a child was on the table and DIDNT interfere with relationships as a whole in the game then it MIGHT not be so bad. Seriously, Im the type of person that if this were in game, and no obvious indicator was present to warn me that my LI became pregnant and all of a sudden BAM out pops a child, I would seriously delete my data and start over from scratch....Either that or just sacrafice the child to the dark spawn as a snack, whichever one I had the option to do first
how about if the pregnancy starts with a dialogue choice? making it your decision wether you have a child or not on the next time skip.
#311
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 05:44
nightcobra8928 wrote...
Aradace wrote...
nightcobra8928 wrote...
Aradace wrote...
As long as it's an "option" sure I suppose. But again, like Fable, a form of "contraceptive" would need to be available for me to be ok with it. Otherwise, it would most likely have me being "single" through the entirety of the game.
fable is a really bad example of how a romance and becoming a parent can be implemented in a videogame, even old rpgs used it better even though they were part of the story like in lufia2 and others.
Honestly, it's not a fear of bad implementation that turns me off to the whole idea. As I said, it's the thought of having children as a whole. Dont want'em IRL much less in a video game. But as long as the "option" to not have a child was on the table and DIDNT interfere with relationships as a whole in the game then it MIGHT not be so bad. Seriously, Im the type of person that if this were in game, and no obvious indicator was present to warn me that my LI became pregnant and all of a sudden BAM out pops a child, I would seriously delete my data and start over from scratch....Either that or just sacrafice the child to the dark spawn as a snack, whichever one I had the option to do first
how about if the pregnancy starts with a dialogue choice? making it your decision wether you have a child or not on the next time skip.
"Honey dp you mind if we time it correctly/ not use the rubbers today?"
#312
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 05:46
captain.subtle wrote...
nightcobra8928 wrote...
Aradace wrote...
nightcobra8928 wrote...
Aradace wrote...
As long as it's an "option" sure I suppose. But again, like Fable, a form of "contraceptive" would need to be available for me to be ok with it. Otherwise, it would most likely have me being "single" through the entirety of the game.
fable is a really bad example of how a romance and becoming a parent can be implemented in a videogame, even old rpgs used it better even though they were part of the story like in lufia2 and others.
Honestly, it's not a fear of bad implementation that turns me off to the whole idea. As I said, it's the thought of having children as a whole. Dont want'em IRL much less in a video game. But as long as the "option" to not have a child was on the table and DIDNT interfere with relationships as a whole in the game then it MIGHT not be so bad. Seriously, Im the type of person that if this were in game, and no obvious indicator was present to warn me that my LI became pregnant and all of a sudden BAM out pops a child, I would seriously delete my data and start over from scratch....Either that or just sacrafice the child to the dark spawn as a snack, whichever one I had the option to do first
how about if the pregnancy starts with a dialogue choice? making it your decision wether you have a child or not on the next time skip.
"Honey dp you mind if we time it correctly/ not use the rubbers today?"
hey if your hawke's personality is snarky and joke...ish, you may end up saying something like that.
me? i prefer more serious and heartwarming responses. but that's just me:P
Modifié par nightcobra8928, 13 septembre 2010 - 05:48 .
#313
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 05:47
nightcobra8928 wrote...
Aradace wrote...
nightcobra8928 wrote...
Aradace wrote...
As long as it's an "option" sure I suppose. But again, like Fable, a form of "contraceptive" would need to be available for me to be ok with it. Otherwise, it would most likely have me being "single" through the entirety of the game.
fable is a really bad example of how a romance and becoming a parent can be implemented in a videogame, even old rpgs used it better even though they were part of the story like in lufia2 and others.
Honestly, it's not a fear of bad implementation that turns me off to the whole idea. As I said, it's the thought of having children as a whole. Dont want'em IRL much less in a video game. But as long as the "option" to not have a child was on the table and DIDNT interfere with relationships as a whole in the game then it MIGHT not be so bad. Seriously, Im the type of person that if this were in game, and no obvious indicator was present to warn me that my LI became pregnant and all of a sudden BAM out pops a child, I would seriously delete my data and start over from scratch....Either that or just sacrafice the child to the dark spawn as a snack, whichever one I had the option to do first
how about if the pregnancy starts with a dialogue choice? making it your decision wether you have a child or not on the next time skip.
That would actually be acceptable IMO. All I can see now though is the dialog choices of "Tuck" and "Pull" being options
#314
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 05:48
nightcobra8928 wrote...
hey if your hawke's personality is snarky and joke...ish, you may end up saying something like that.
me? i prefer more serious and heatwarming responses. but that's just me:P
So its gonna be "Honey, I want to be mom...." for you I guess....
#315
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 05:48
Collider wrote...
Far simpler just to make Hawke having a family be an option at the end of the game for the epilogue. If Hawke's LI is human, anyhow.
This makes the most sense. No point in diverting resources to creating a family that we would have very little interaction with.
#316
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 05:49
ErichHartmann wrote...
Collider wrote...
Far simpler just to make Hawke having a family be an option at the end of the game for the epilogue. If Hawke's LI is human, anyhow.
This makes the most sense. No point in diverting resources to creating a family that we would have very little interaction with.
In the words of Cap'n Jack Sparrow "Much more bettah!!"
#317
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 05:51
#318
Guest_Dalira Montanti_*
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 05:57
Guest_Dalira Montanti_*
#319
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 06:00
Dalira Montanti wrote...
@Nightcobra: most of the devs will end up laughing at the meer thaught or give a wired comment
if so, let them:P i just want to know if they can give some positive/negative feedback on the issue.
#320
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 06:56
Dalira Montanti wrote...
@Nightcobra: most of the devs will end up laughing at the meer thaught or give a wired comment
Pardon?
Anyway, I don't really understand why there is such a negative reaction to any suggestions. Some might find an idea good, some might dislike it. Just because one doesn't agree with a suggestion, doesn't make it stupid.
Personally, I don't like epilogues. For one thing, they're buggy. For another, they seem like a graveyard of canned ideas and rather restrictive of what's going to happen next. It is better to leave an idea and an ending into the air.
I am starting to see that pregnancy or possibility of having a child, in-game, is unlikely to happen. But I still find it quite an interesting idea for adding into the game. Yes, preferably it should happen under very certain restrictions. Perhaps some dialogue options or a certain companion or NPC, beyond just wanting to have a romance scene and saying "Let's have a baby!"
Bioware hasn't delivered THAT awful plotlines as of yet, some of which might be comparable to Fable. If they are going to pull off the option of having offspring, I am sure they will make it very compelling and reasonable. Like I have said before.
Modifié par Russalka, 13 septembre 2010 - 06:57 .
#321
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 10:24
#322
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 10:35
#323
Guest_Blasto the jelly_*
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 10:44
Guest_Blasto the jelly_*
Whew That was my Longest Comment So Far!
Modifié par Blasto the jelly, 13 septembre 2010 - 10:45 .
#324
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 11:31
Blasto the jelly wrote...
Anyway you wont have a Child in Game if your Hawke Does'nt Have sex.

I already gave my opinion...
Families in games are such a burden...they get kidnapped or killed, among other things. But yeah, I agree, it would add some depth, maybe I'll like it, maybe not (if it's implemented).
It's quite unlikely, but it could happen. I trust in Bioware.
#325
Posté 13 septembre 2010 - 11:38
Modifié par Tsuga C, 13 septembre 2010 - 11:44 .





Retour en haut




