515 réponses à ce sujet

[Russalka]

Don't have sex, then!

[SirOccam]

nhsk wrote...

The problem with children making the plot richer weaving it into the storyline is that it forces players to have the children...

No it doesn't. Having a romance with anyone in DAO made the plot richer, but no one forced you to have one.

[captain.subtle]

Russalka wrote...

captain.subtle wrote...

umm.. I thought we meant US! As in, we the players! But I think you just disproved me...

I mean you really want Hawke (lady) to be all pregnant and fighting darkspawn or taking a maternity leave???? Or being all motherly all of a sudden (hormonal change)???

And don't forget she will have to feed the bay which will keep the entire camp awake the whole night and poop into your DLC armour.

I understand where you're coming from. Hollywood has made so that everything concerning newborn children is all about nappies, hormones and restless nights with jokes about or with them.

I favour this baby plan only if they can weave it into the storyline, if it makes the plot richer. But if they do add possibilities of children, I am sure they will pull it off well.

Of course i am thinking that way...

ITS A GAME!

Not real life.....

Luckily BW knows that for sure... (I am guessing here TBH) and they know what their mature audience/customer wants.

[Saibh]

captain.subtle wrote...

Of course i am thinking that way...

ITS A GAME!

Not real life.....

Luckily BW knows that for sure... (I am guessing here TBH) and they know what their mature audience/customer wants.

Did you read anything I said to you?

[captain.subtle]

Saibh wrote...

captain.subtle wrote...

Of course i am thinking that way...

ITS A GAME!

Not real life.....

Luckily BW knows that for sure... (I am guessing here TBH) and they know what their mature audience/customer wants.

Did you read anything I said to you?

Sorry Aunty I did and deciced not to reply....

[Laine the Wise]

Saibh wrote...

captain.subtle wrote...

Of course i am thinking that way...

ITS A GAME!

Not real life.....

Luckily BW knows that for sure... (I am guessing here TBH) and they know what their mature audience/customer wants.

Did you read anything I said to you?

I doubt he'd care even if he did.

Edit: Ignorance is bliss. 

I support the idea for a little Hawke chick. It could offer an interesting perspective.

Modifié par Laine the Wise, 11 septembre 2010 - 08:39 .

[captain.subtle]

Laine the Wise wrote...

Saibh wrote...

captain.subtle wrote...

Of course i am thinking that way...

ITS A GAME!

Not real life.....

Luckily BW knows that for sure... (I am guessing here TBH) and they know what their mature audience/customer wants.

Did you read anything I said to you?

I doubt he'd care even if he did.

Justified name (I mean it.... ).

[Russalka]

Thank you for not contributing then.



Hmm, but when the issue of forcing babies down the player's throat arises (not literally), it kind of forces the people who are only after Hawke getting some nookie into a corner, doesn't it? :/

[captain.subtle]

Russalka wrote...

Thank you for not contributing then.

Hmm, but when the issue of forcing babies down the player's throat arises (not literally), it kind of forces the people who are only after Hawke getting some nookie into a corner, doesn't it? :/

Riiight... Now you are pro-pregnancy, anti-nookie.

Heard of contraceptives?

[Russalka]

captain.subtle wrote...

Riiight... Now you are pro-pregnancy, anti-nookie.

Heard of contraceptives?

Thank you for missing my point. I was humorously refering to the post about if babies do come and it will be "weaved into the storyline", they will become mandatory.

The point is, that romance isn't mandatory either. However I do believe there will be encounters which are more Zevran-like, for fun, nothing more. But if Hawke wishes to settle down, and with the "estates" around or in Kirkwall we keep hearing about, why not? 

[captain.subtle]

Russalka wrote...

Thank you for missing my point. I was humorously refering to the post about if babies do come and it will be "weaved into the storyline", they will become mandatory.

The point is, that romance isn't mandatory either. However I do believe there will be encounters which are more Zevran-like, for fun, nothing more. But if Hawke wishes to settle down, and with the "estates" around or in Kirkwall we keep hearing about, why not? 

Where do nookies fit in then? Remember Gheyna and Isabela?  They were not party members or romance options...

[Russalka]

captain.subtle wrote...

Where do nookies fit in then? Remember Gheyna and Isabela?  They were not party members or romance options...

Read my post please. I said I am sure there will be encounters like that. Just for you.

[Ischkwezrn]

I hope femhawke can have Oghrens babies

[captain.subtle]

Russalka wrote...

captain.subtle wrote...

Where do nookies fit in then? Remember Gheyna and Isabela?  They were not party members or romance options...

Read my post please. I said I am sure there will be encounters like that. Just for you.

you mean this sentence makes sense?

"I was humorously refering to the post about if babies do come and it
will be "weaved into the storyline", they will become mandatory."

Explainez!

[Shadow_broker]

No hawke babies in dragon age

[Russalka]

captain.subtle wrote...


you mean this sentence makes sense?

"I was humorously refering to the post about if babies do come and it
will be "weaved into the storyline", they will become mandatory."

Explainez!

Blasto the jelly wrote...

nhsk wrote...

The
problem with children making the plot richer weaving it into the
storyline is that it forces players to have the children...

Well
its not Forced on you if you don't have Sex../../../../images/forum/emoticons/tongue.png

понимаете?

[nhsk]

Blasto the jelly wrote...

nhsk wrote...

The problem with children making the plot richer weaving it into the storyline is that it forces players to have the children...

Well its not Forced on you if you don't have Sex

Yup, it will not matter - Some way or another, you will have the damn kid if it's tied into the storyline in a way. 1 or 2 sidequests at most, if more it will be a requirement for everyone to have the kid.. Do not want.

[captain.subtle]

Russalka wrote...

captain.subtle wrote...


you mean this sentence makes sense?

"I was humorously refering to the post about if babies do come and it
will be "weaved into the storyline", they will become mandatory."

Explainez!

Blasto the jelly wrote...

nhsk wrote...

The
problem with children making the plot richer weaving it into the
storyline is that it forces players to have the children...

Well
its not Forced on you if you don't have Sex../../../../images/forum/emoticons/tongue.png

понимаете?

Errr.... Did you realize what I was saying? That contraceptives make Baby-making a bit stone-age thingy.... So it is NOT mandatory to have romance and babies... comprendez?

[Russalka]

captain.subtle wrote...

Errr.... Did you realize what I was saying? That contraceptives make Baby-making a bit stone-age thingy.... So it is NOT mandatory to have romance and babies... comprendez?

And that's what I explained with the casual no-strings attatched sexual encounters or Zevran-esque romance.
But what if a person comes along that wants to settle down with Hawke? And it happens in the timeshift! And children come out of it! Is it too much? Depends. People like different things. Get over it.