It depends on when you mean. If it happens in the game, Anora would rule. If it happens after the game, say, a couple of decades down the road, it would be whoever Alistair had named as his heir at that time--maybe child of his own (very unlikely), maybe a child of Fergus's or Teagan's. My personal feeling is that it would no longer be Anora, because that was a stop-gap measure in case Alistair was killed fighting the archdemon. There's an unused game slide in the toolset that refers to Anora being sent to the Chantry, so that's a possibility, or he may have executed her after the battle. We don't know, and it probably depends on whether he's hardened or unhardened. Hardened, he he would clearly prefer that she not rule Ferelden.Dalira Montanti wrote...
ok quick question is Alistair died before his Queen-Concort or whatever its called what would happen them?
In any case, the warden would never rule, as they're a consort, not a co-ruler. While he could conceivably name his consort as heir, that would be a very bad idea, as she is likely to die very shortly after him of the taint, and is also likely to be unable to reproduce. If you're going to move outside the Theirin bloodline, which will have to happen if another Theirin doesn't show up, it should be someone who can establish a new line that can be solidified by heirs. It also sets a dubious precedent, recreating exactly the sort of situation that occured with Anora. You really don't want a series of civil wars between consorts and blood heirs everytime a ruler dies.
Modifié par errant_knight, 05 octobre 2010 - 06:11 .
Retour en haut
If you don't, not so much.
:o:o:o:o
