My question is this: TACTICALLY, what does it make the most sense to do here? If, for instance, you were moderately friendly with both and romancing neither, what would drive the decision? Would you want to clear out everyone attacking the bombsite, or leave your squadmate with it to protect it until it blows? Would you save Kaidan no matter where he is, because he's the ranking officer? Would you save Ash because she's a woman and it's the chivalrous thing to do (or girl power, if you're female)? Basically, I want to know what people think would/should drive this decision without anything like "Kaidan's a whiner" or "Ash is a bigot" or "I
Another Virmire topic (Tactically Speaking)
#1
Posté 12 septembre 2010 - 01:56
My question is this: TACTICALLY, what does it make the most sense to do here? If, for instance, you were moderately friendly with both and romancing neither, what would drive the decision? Would you want to clear out everyone attacking the bombsite, or leave your squadmate with it to protect it until it blows? Would you save Kaidan no matter where he is, because he's the ranking officer? Would you save Ash because she's a woman and it's the chivalrous thing to do (or girl power, if you're female)? Basically, I want to know what people think would/should drive this decision without anything like "Kaidan's a whiner" or "Ash is a bigot" or "I
#2
Posté 12 septembre 2010 - 02:01
2) Kaidan is left to arm the bomb. Kaidan is a specialist and while skilled in combat it isn't really his thing. Since the Salarians are the "muscle" of the operation, it makes more sense to hold him back. Can arm the nuke.
Decision time we can look at one of two ways.
If we know the bomb will go off anyway: Save Ashley and the Salarians at the AA Tower, simply because there are more of them and - let's face it - the fight with Saren is much cooler on the AA Tower.
If we do NOT know the bomb will go off anyway: Save Kaidan. Your whole purpose for being there is blowing up the base, that bomb needs to go off, so securing it is of vital importance.
That'd be the purely objective, logical way to go - IMHO
Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 12 septembre 2010 - 02:02 .
#3
Posté 12 septembre 2010 - 02:28
-Kaidan Goes with the bomb because he has "tech" experience.
-Ashley Goes with Salarians because of soldier "Hold the Line" experience.
I don't know how exactly Kaidan "Makes sure" that the bomb goes off so I secure it.
Although I have to admit, the holding his/her guts in while protecting the bomb is a bit more dramatic...
#4
Posté 12 septembre 2010 - 04:19
However, consider this: IF Kirrahe/Kaidan is to be believed, then rescuing Ash on the AA tower (or vice-versa, if you sent them opposite) could be a prudent decision. In the absence of clairvoyance (previous playthroughs), shouldn't we assume that any suriviving Salarians would be on the AA tower and would never make it to the Normandy if you didn't assist them? If your squadmate assures you that he/she can protect the bomb, then you would be saving one life by returning to the bomb site, and numerous by hitting the AA tower. Is this relevant?
#5
Posté 12 septembre 2010 - 05:17
#6
Posté 19 septembre 2010 - 08:15
Kaiden is a L2 Biotic and he has minimal complications, making him a rarity. In all honesty, he is probably one of the most powerful biotics the Alliance military has. He has tech training, and from the looks of the Sentinel skill tree, medical training as well. The cost that would gone into his training and equipment is easily ten times that of Ashley's.
Ashely is your run-of-the-mill soldier. She is probably one of the best, but there is nothing really ability wise that singles her out as a resource.
Ashley is probably (and somewhat ironically) the better squadmate gameplay wise for most players, and she is a wonderful character, but she's far more easily replaced. It is much easier and less expensive to train another Soldier than it is train another L2 Sentinel.
Of course, putting the mission back in, the top priority is the bomb. Destroying the base is the object of your mission, and I feel the priority is making sure the bomb goes off no matter what, which means defending it until the last possible moment.
Modifié par HakkyounoTenshi, 19 septembre 2010 - 08:20 .
#7
Guest_Spuudle_*
Posté 20 septembre 2010 - 09:44
Guest_Spuudle_*
HakkyounoTenshi wrote...
In all honesty, taking the mission itself out of the picture, Kaiden is more valuble than Ashley is (in my opinion). I have said this before on several other threads but Kaiden is an officer and a specialist, whereas Ashley is just a soldier. They are both military, so gender is not part of the equation.
Kaiden is a L2 Biotic and he has minimal complications, making him a rarity. In all honesty, he is probably one of the most powerful biotics the Alliance military has. He has tech training, and from the looks of the Sentinel skill tree, medical training as well. The cost that would gone into his training and equipment is easily ten times that of Ashley's.
Ashely is your run-of-the-mill soldier. She is probably one of the best, but there is nothing really ability wise that singles her out as a resource.
Ashley is probably (and somewhat ironically) the better squadmate gameplay wise for most players, and she is a wonderful character, but she's far more easily replaced. It is much easier and less expensive to train another Soldier than it is train another L2 Sentinel.
Of course, putting the mission back in, the top priority is the bomb. Destroying the base is the object of your mission, and I feel the priority is making sure the bomb goes off no matter what, which means defending it until the last possible moment.
Whilst I take your points, I'd tend to disagree with you, based on the following;
Kaidans Tech skills, are way inferior to those of Tali. His Biotic skills are inferior to those of Liara.
Wrex has similar biotic ability / Garrus has similar tech ability
No one else within the squad (yourself aside) has full combat ability like Ashley. Choosing Kaidan, from a 'strength and balance of squad' perspective is just a non argument. It has to be Ashley every time. There is no valid tactical or technical reasoning that can argue for Kaidan, in my opinion. This is based on the squad you have in ME1 though, from the players perspective. I.E we cant go out and train/include another soldier.
#8
Posté 20 septembre 2010 - 11:53
Spuudle wrote...
Whilst I take your points, I'd tend to disagree with you, based on the following;
Kaidans Tech skills, are way inferior to those of Tali. His Biotic skills are inferior to those of Liara.
Wrex has similar biotic ability / Garrus has similar tech ability
No one else within the squad (yourself aside) has full combat ability like Ashley. Choosing Kaidan, from a 'strength and balance of squad' perspective is just a non argument. It has to be Ashley every time. There is no valid tactical or technical reasoning that can argue for Kaidan, in my opinion. This is based on the squad you have in ME1 though, from the players perspective. I.E we cant go out and train/include another soldier.
You misunderstand my reasoning. When SDCrush opened the topic, the question was what tactics and reasoning make your decision. My statement is from a roleplay perspective. Notice I didn't call Kaiden the more valuble squadmate I called him the more valuble resource.
#9
Guest_Spuudle_*
Posté 21 septembre 2010 - 12:58
Guest_Spuudle_*
HakkyounoTenshi wrote...
Spuudle wrote...
Whilst I take your points, I'd tend to disagree with you, based on the following;
Kaidans Tech skills, are way inferior to those of Tali. His Biotic skills are inferior to those of Liara.
Wrex has similar biotic ability / Garrus has similar tech ability
No one else within the squad (yourself aside) has full combat ability like Ashley. Choosing Kaidan, from a 'strength and balance of squad' perspective is just a non argument. It has to be Ashley every time. There is no valid tactical or technical reasoning that can argue for Kaidan, in my opinion. This is based on the squad you have in ME1 though, from the players perspective. I.E we cant go out and train/include another soldier.
You misunderstand my reasoning. When SDCrush opened the topic, the question was what tactics and reasoning make your decision. My statement is from a roleplay perspective. Notice I didn't call Kaiden the more valuble squadmate I called him the more valuble resource.
I dont think ive missed your reasoning at all. I stated I was coming from the players perspective and wasn't saying you were wrong, just that from my stated perspective that I disagree. I appreciate that you were coming from another angle. I feel Ashley is more valuable as a squadmate when facing the decision to choose. You feel Kaidan is a more valuable resource, but when actually playing and the choice arises, who then, do you choose? And why?
EDIT-Typo
Modifié par Spuudle, 21 septembre 2010 - 01:09 .
#10
Posté 21 septembre 2010 - 02:55
Spuudle wrote...
HakkyounoTenshi wrote...
Spuudle wrote...
Whilst I take your points, I'd tend to disagree with you, based on the following;
Kaidans Tech skills, are way inferior to those of Tali. His Biotic skills are inferior to those of Liara.
Wrex has similar biotic ability / Garrus has similar tech ability
No one else within the squad (yourself aside) has full combat ability like Ashley. Choosing Kaidan, from a 'strength and balance of squad' perspective is just a non argument. It has to be Ashley every time. There is no valid tactical or technical reasoning that can argue for Kaidan, in my opinion. This is based on the squad you have in ME1 though, from the players perspective. I.E we cant go out and train/include another soldier.
You misunderstand my reasoning. When SDCrush opened the topic, the question was what tactics and reasoning make your decision. My statement is from a roleplay perspective. Notice I didn't call Kaiden the more valuble squadmate I called him the more valuble resource.
I dont think ive missed your reasoning at all. I stated I was coming from the players perspective and wasn't saying you were wrong, just that from my stated perspective that I disagree. I appreciate that you were coming from another angle. I feel Ashley is more valuable as a squadmate when facing the decision to choose. You feel Kaidan is a more valuable resource, but when actually playing and the choice arises, who then, do you choose? And why?
EDIT-Typo
When trying to argue the value of Ashley compaired to Kaidan it doesnt help much having a sig that advertises the fact that you are an Ashley fanboy.
#11
Posté 21 septembre 2010 - 05:15
Mr Mxyzptlk wrote...
When trying to argue the value of Ashley compaired to Kaidan it doesnt help much having a sig that advertises the fact that you are an Ashley fanboy.
Mr. Mxyzptlk,
I appreciate your input and your opinion, but Spuudle does make valid points. He believes that it is worth more to save Ashley and makes good arguments for that reasoning. His signature in no way detracts from the validity of his arguments.
Spuudle wrote...
I dont think ive missed your reasoning at all. I stated I was coming
from the players perspective and wasn't saying you were wrong, just that
from my stated perspective that I disagree. I appreciate that you were
coming from another angle. I feel Ashley is more valuable as a squadmate
when facing the decision to choose. You feel Kaidan is a more valuable
resource, but when actually playing and the choice arises, who then, do
you choose? And why?
EDIT-Typo
Unless I'm romancing Ashley, I save Kaiden. Like I said earlier I believe he's the more valuble resource, and I tend to leave him at the bombsite, and from (my) roleplaying perspective the primary objective is to secure the bomb. My primary party tends to be Garrus and Wrex anyway, so party make up does not influence the decision.
Modifié par HakkyounoTenshi, 21 septembre 2010 - 05:17 .
#12
Guest_Spuudle_*
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 12:37
Guest_Spuudle_*
Mr Mxyzptlk wrote...
Spuudle wrote...
HakkyounoTenshi wrote...
Spuudle wrote...
Whilst I take your points, I'd tend to disagree with you, based on the following;
Kaidans Tech skills, are way inferior to those of Tali. His Biotic skills are inferior to those of Liara.
Wrex has similar biotic ability / Garrus has similar tech ability
No one else within the squad (yourself aside) has full combat ability like Ashley. Choosing Kaidan, from a 'strength and balance of squad' perspective is just a non argument. It has to be Ashley every time. There is no valid tactical or technical reasoning that can argue for Kaidan, in my opinion. This is based on the squad you have in ME1 though, from the players perspective. I.E we cant go out and train/include another soldier.
You misunderstand my reasoning. When SDCrush opened the topic, the question was what tactics and reasoning make your decision. My statement is from a roleplay perspective. Notice I didn't call Kaiden the more valuble squadmate I called him the more valuble resource.
I dont think ive missed your reasoning at all. I stated I was coming from the players perspective and wasn't saying you were wrong, just that from my stated perspective that I disagree. I appreciate that you were coming from another angle. I feel Ashley is more valuable as a squadmate when facing the decision to choose. You feel Kaidan is a more valuable resource, but when actually playing and the choice arises, who then, do you choose? And why?
EDIT-Typo
When trying to argue the value of Ashley compaired to Kaidan it doesnt help much having a sig that advertises the fact that you are an Ashley fanboy.
Irelevant mate. The signature bar has no bearing on the discussion whatsoever. Am i not allowed to express my opinion because I want to bring the Ashley storyline to conclusion in either dlc or me3? However, you are entitled to your opinion as am I.
#13
Guest_Spuudle_*
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 12:42
Guest_Spuudle_*
I agree that if this were something I was watching, or a story I was reading, Kaidan is probably more valuable and certainly more difficult to replace. Playing the game though, I stand by my original point. I accept that we are both coming at this from entirely different perspectives. We are not comparing like for like.
Modifié par Spuudle, 22 septembre 2010 - 12:52 .
#14
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 12:52
An army will fall apart as an effective fighting force if morale or loyalty are compromised. The British Army teaches that officers earn loyalty by embodying six values: commitment, self-sacrifice, courage, professionalism, decency and integrity.
If the officer class does not routinely display more self-sacrifice and courage than the troops they command, it will lose the loyalty of the troops. In contrast Kaiden sacrificing himself so a sergeant under his command could be evac'd is a stellar example of courage and self-sacrifice and is ideal officer behaviour.
#15
Guest_Spuudle_*
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 01:56
Guest_Spuudle_*
CaptainZaysh wrote...
As far as rescuing Kaiden over Ashley because he's an officer and she's not: I'd argue that's actually a reason to save Ash.
An army will fall apart as an effective fighting force if morale or loyalty are compromised. The British Army teaches that officers earn loyalty by embodying six values: commitment, self-sacrifice, courage, professionalism, decency and integrity.
If the officer class does not routinely display more self-sacrifice and courage than the troops they command, it will lose the loyalty of the troops. In contrast Kaiden sacrificing himself so a sergeant under his command could be evac'd is a stellar example of courage and self-sacrifice and is ideal officer behaviour.
Apologies if im wrong but i thought kaidan was classed as an alliance sentinel. I didnt think he outranked ashley at all, just that he had a different skillset? i agree with your description of required officer attributes, just didnt realize kaidan was an alliance 'officer'.
#16
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 02:28
Affirmative. Shep must return to the nuke to ensure the mission's success regardless of who arms it. As for who Shep chooses to join Kirrahe, both Ash and Kaiden are fully capable of babysitting/arming the nuke, so Shep should choose Ash since Kirrahe clearly requires a tank. Nevertheless, I always save Kaiden for ME2.Arbalest7 wrote...
Tactically making sure the bomb goes off takes priority it is the mission objective after all.
#17
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 02:29
Spuudle wrote...
Apologies if im wrong but i thought kaidan was classed as an alliance sentinel. I didnt think he outranked ashley at all, just that he had a different skillset? i agree with your description of required officer attributes, just didnt realize kaidan was an alliance 'officer'.
Kaidan is referred to as LT making him a Lieutenant (low ranking officer) while Ashley is a Gunnery Chief (high ranking NCO).
As for Virmire. I usually send Kaidan to the bomb and Ash with the Salarians because as others have stated I feel that's where they best fit. When it comes to the decision from a tactical standpoint I have received two assurances that the bomb will go off. Kirrahe assures me that it will work and is difficult to disarm, and Kaidan assures me he can hold the site until the bomb blows. I have no reason to doubt their judgement and trust that Kaidan, as an officer, is level headed enough to not jeopardize the mission out of pride or sentimentality. This puts me into damage control, the bomb is going to blow so which course of action saves the most people. Ultimately I choose Ash and the Salarians.
#18
Posté 23 septembre 2010 - 04:19
My biggest concern with the bomb isn't so much it getting disarmed but loaded onto the Geth ship and transported away from where it must be as stated in game. IF that is the only place it will destroy the base, then the Geth could simply move it to another location and since the ship is right above the bomb I can never take the chance.
From a gameplay perspective, unless I am playing a soldier then Ashly is almost always in my party for the tanking and firepower. Now in real life you could probably easily get a replacement soldier from either the crew compliment or a local base, but in game, she is too valuable to waste for my plays. I always run a fairly balanced party, so Kaiden doesn't mesh well with how I play my parties.
#19
Posté 23 septembre 2010 - 12:06
#20
Guest_Spuudle_*
Posté 23 septembre 2010 - 04:50
Guest_Spuudle_*
#21
Posté 23 septembre 2010 - 05:55
#22
Posté 23 septembre 2010 - 08:25
Spuudle wrote...
There does seem to be some confusion with people assuming that Kaidan is in fact an officer who outranks Ashley. I agree with DPSSOC in that, it is actually Ashley as Gunnery Chief, that outranks Kaidan.
Sorry if their was some confusion. Kaidan is a Lieutenant which is a low ranking officer, but even the lowest ranking officer outranks the highest ranking NCO. NCO stands for Non Commissioned Officer where Kaidan would technically a CO (Commissioned Officer) what you have to do to earn your commission varies from military to military (and no doubt army to navy).
#23
Posté 23 septembre 2010 - 10:09
Spuudle wrote...
There does seem to be some confusion with people assuming that Kaidan is in fact an officer who outranks Ashley. I agree with DPSSOC in that, it is actually Ashley as Gunnery Chief, that outranks Kaidan.
Gunnery Chief most likely refers to Chief Gunnery Sergeant, which would not outrank a Lieutenant.
#24
Posté 23 septembre 2010 - 11:56
As a second note; concerning Kaidan's tech skill vis a vis the bomb - the Salarians are the ones who rigged it (it's their drive core) so it's not like we need someone who knows their omnitool inside-out to arm it. Further, while Kaidan has the tech experience, he also has the "commanding/coordinating troops" experience too. He wouldn't have made LT without it.
Not saying I went one specific way or the other, just saying that "Ash with troops Kaidan with bomb save Kaidan" is not the only logical way for this to play out.
#25
Posté 24 septembre 2010 - 12:04
Optimystic_X wrote...
Further, while Kaidan has the tech experience, he also has the "commanding/coordinating troops" experience too. He wouldn't have made LT without it.
I don't know, I've met plenty of naval LTs who couldn't lead themselves out of an outhouse.
Modifié par rwilli80, 24 septembre 2010 - 12:05 .





Retour en haut






