Ulicus wrote...
Urm. If they come up with a new melee-mage spec like the one you're suggesting, I'd rather they came up with a new name for it too rather than arbitrarily altering the lore because you like the sound of "Arcane Warrior". Hell, what you're talking about seems much more akin to an evolution of Battlemage... which, as a term, has a much wider scope than AW (mage that is trained to wade into the midst of battle, basically) as well as them being much more common in Thedas.lunarknightmage wrote...
I don't see why Arcane Warrior can't still be in the game. Who's to say there's not another AW out there in Thedas ( outside of Ferelden )??
And, as I said, maybe AW won't = sword wielding mage anymore, but it could at least mean a mage that is highly proficient in staff melee combat.
after all, the initial impression of trailer Hawke was that he was an AW, given the way he combined both melee fighting and spell casting.
If mages by default can melee fight like trailer Hawke then that would be great!
But, if not, then there is no reason why mage Hawke couldn't lean to fight like that throuh an AW spec.
And it would still keep the classes distinct because staff fighting is a different fighting style than DW and archery ( for Rogues ) and Sword + Shield and 2h ( for Warriors ).
well, quite frankly, I don't care what they call it. They could call it something else, as long as I can get a melee-oriented warrior/battle mage.





Retour en haut











