aaniadyen wrote...
Hey guys, let's all convince ourselves we're right and everyone else is a raving idiot based off of information we assume is true!
Oh...you already beat me to it. Now I feel inadequate.
It's never too late.
aaniadyen wrote...
Hey guys, let's all convince ourselves we're right and everyone else is a raving idiot based off of information we assume is true!
Oh...you already beat me to it. Now I feel inadequate.
LobselVith8 wrote...
I'm not saying they have no issues, I'm saying they have mages in leadership positions, so they serve as a working alternative to the Chantry's solution, which I find better than living under armored drug addicts who have no oversight. An insane Cullen can end up ruling the Circle in fear if the Circle is culled, after all.
You didn't see what that was in response to, did you? That statement was said in response to someone making a broad statement about mages being unable to control themselves, and I retorted that under that line of reasoning, the templars must be incompetent. In all seriousness, I don't see a point to this debate. No one is changing their stance. Plenty continue to extol the current method used on mages, and others see it as offensive. I have argued against the system used by the Chantry with the templars, and I've also argued that I'm not saying all templars are evil or anything of the sort. I'm arguing the same line of thought as Alistair and Anora: mages have earned the right to govern themselves.
Anathemic wrote...
The current Chantry is totally perverted in what Andraste originally wanted:
"Magic is meant to serve man, not to rule over him"
ZOMG WE MUST IMPRISON AND PERSECUTE ALL MAGES LOCK EM UP IN DA TOWA!!!!
No, Andraste's original message was that magic is a powerful tool, and like everything that comes with power comes great responsibility.
Anathemic wrote...
No, Andraste's original message was that magic is a powerful tool, and like everything that comes with power comes great responsibility.
Modifié par aaniadyen, 01 octobre 2010 - 01:58 .