Arcian wrote...
No, my point is that if we have to choose, choosing the geth is overall better because they aren't militarily useless bigots with ingrained grudges like the quarians. If we get the choice to save both, naturally I will do that since the quarians are better purposed in a field medic role, kind of.Calinstel wrote...
It is clear that you only wish to push your agenda and views. Kill the quarians. Save the geth.
Do you even know what pragmatic means? Saving both is impossibly pragmatic if the choice itself is inherently impossible, which it might be if BW decides to enforce the "choose one or the other, they are mutually exclusive"-idea.Calinstel wrote...
The pragmatic choice is to not accept either individual option.
No, it's that if the quarians keep pushing for war and refuse to work with the geth, letting the bigoted quarians perish in their inevitably losing war is preferable to helping them eliminate the inarguably stronger combat force. I'm just being harshly practical here, I don't want either to die. I even defend the bloody batarians because they can still be useful, and I in the role of Shepard has every reason to hate their guts (Mindoir and Elysium).Calinstel wrote...
Your argument is that since the quarians attacked the geth, it is only proper to let the geth finish the job and wipe them out?Doesn't really matter, I'm her captain. She can deal with it or request a transfer.Calinstel wrote...
Tali would be greatly disappointed in your reasoning.Also, there is no singular platform large enough to hold every geth in existence. Therefore, no matter how you angle the idea, a lot of "uniqueness" is inevitably going to be lost, which would equal mass murder on an intellectual and sapient level.Calinstel wrote...
If a quarian dies, that unique entity is gone forever. If a geth dies, the geth collective downloads copies of the very same program into a new platform. Nothing unique is lost.Or, it just shows the quarians ancestral hatred for the geth runs so deep that they refuse to be practical and sensical about it. Just the fact of them prioritizing to fight the geth when they KNOW the Reapers are coming shows how retarded they are being about it.Calinstel wrote...
Fact. BW showed via Legion that peace can be obtained. If they chose now to ignore their own information then BW is much less the software company I was led to believe.This was made with Tali in mind when I asked people to remove Tali's loyalty and love from the equation of having to choose between the quarians and the geth out of a "who is better fit to fight the Reapers"-perspective? It is a trick question, because the correct answer is the geth. Yet people keep using their obsessive love and adoration for her and her very flawed and weak species as a reason to oppose the much more combat-able and stronger geth, which of course is a valid answer to my original question because it shows how people - much like the quarians themselves - refuse to be practical about the situation.Calinstel wrote...
This is off topic
Social experiment concluded. You can go back to your mancing.Calinstel wrote...
and again, Tali would be highly disappointed.
And yet again, Tali can be as disappointed as she likes, I'm still her captain. And if she's got a problem with that, the airlock is that way ---->. Of course, we will land somewhere before she exits so the vacuum doesn't kill her, but still, if she's got a problem with it she is absolutely welcome to leave.
+1
BTW so you guys should know.

I am not a Tali nor Quarian hater.





Retour en haut





