Modifié par smudboy, 22 septembre 2010 - 07:35 .
ME2: A Video Analysis of Lair of the Shadow Broker
#1
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 07:34
#2
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 07:46
#3
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 07:53
#4
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 07:59
Omicrone wrote...
I stopped watching at the point where you can't tell the difference between Thane and Feron.
Yes, BioWare forums: there are intelligent viewers.
element:
I am in that category.
#5
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 08:00
Edit : Needs more making fun of Vasir's armor with heels..coz it's the stupidest thing ever.
Modifié par Anacronian Stryx, 22 septembre 2010 - 08:02 .
#6
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 08:06
Omicrone wrote...
I stopped watching at the point where you can't tell the difference between Thane and Feron.
That was a joke, dude. Could you really not pick up on that?
#7
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 08:26
Won't bother with this one since I kinda expected that you will say something about Feron and Thane.
#8
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 08:29
#9
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 08:32
#10
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 08:38
Also i'm suprised you didn't bring up the fact that Shepard never questions Tela Vasir's presence in the first place (which was the only "problem" I had with the story of the DLC).
#11
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 08:45
#12
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 08:47
Rapturian wrote...
Though I respect your analysis, including the other ones about ME 2, why does everyone think they can pull off reviews/analysis the way Yahtzee or AVGN? They pull it off because they have good, valid points. And that's what your videos are lacking, valid points. Though that is my own opinion, and it would be very boring if everyone agreed with each other, wouldn't it?
Acutelly. The analysis he makes are more like the SW prequel reviews (he also make other reviews) made by "Red letter media" on youtube.
Go wacht em.
#13
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 09:04
Lizardviking wrote...
Not nearly as good as your character and plot videos. But still okay.
Also i'm suprised you didn't bring up the fact that Shepard never questions Tela Vasir's presence in the first place (which was the only "problem" I had with the story of the DLC).
Good point. Shepard should've definitely questioned her more.
It does seem quite out of the blue that she's "in the neighbourhood" during a random attempted murder investigation at an apartment complex. Though, this is just as reminiscent of Nihlus discovering Saren. Either way, Shepard's out of the loop, even if re-instated; nor was the council giving them insider info on all their Spectre operations. Seems they all work independently.
#14
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 09:05
Rapturian wrote...
Though I respect your analysis, including the other ones about ME 2, why does everyone think they can pull off reviews/analysis the way Yahtzee or AVGN? They pull it off because they have good, valid points. And that's what your videos are lacking, valid points. Though that is my own opinion, and it would be very boring if everyone agreed with each other, wouldn't it?
I admit, some of my "points" aren't of any great storytelling value. Though most are. Perhaps you'd care to reference?
#15
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 09:09
Modifié par Sleepicub09, 22 septembre 2010 - 09:10 .
#16
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 09:10
smudboy wrote...
Lizardviking wrote...
Not nearly as good as your character and plot videos. But still okay.
Also i'm suprised you didn't bring up the fact that Shepard never questions Tela Vasir's presence in the first place (which was the only "problem" I had with the story of the DLC).
Good point. Shepard should've definitely questioned her more.
It does seem quite out of the blue that she's "in the neighbourhood" during a random attempted murder investigation at an apartment complex. Though, this is just as reminiscent of Nihlus discovering Saren. Either way, Shepard's out of the loop, even if re-instated; nor was the council giving them insider info on all their Spectre operations. Seems they all work independently.
While Shepard questioning Tela Vasir wouldn't have done much, since she would just tell him whatever lie she wanted. It still a minor plothole.
But that's okay, since I can live with minor plotholes (considering it's almost impossible not to have em).
#17
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 09:11
#18
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 09:14
I, too, find puffy shirts + Shakespeare to be gay. Never gets old, though.Optimystic_X wrote...
Using the word "gay" as a synonym for "bad" isn't getting old at all. No, really.
#19
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 09:16
Sleepicub09 wrote...
I'm sorry but if shuttle got too close to the entrance don't you think the broker would have shot it down?
1. Why couldn't they detect the shuttle before, when it flew from space, from behind the ship, along side it, and then all the way to the front of the ship?
2. Only service drones detected them, and that was after they dropped off the shuttle.
#20
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 09:17
ME2 really should have had you following Wilson's lead to the Shadow Broker as an antagonist, and then using his intel to attack the collectors. That would not have removed the overall problem of being way too episodic, but it would have been a big improvement.
#21
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 09:19
smudboy wrote...
I, too, find puffy shirts + Shakespeare to be gay. Never gets old, though.
Funny, I could have sworn it had something to do with sexual orientation.
You know what? I already know what kind of person I'm talking to. Enjoy your videos, kid.
#22
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 09:19
Well, the shuttle does have cloaking capabilities.smudboy wrote...
Sleepicub09 wrote...
I'm sorry but if shuttle got too close to the entrance don't you think the broker would have shot it down?
1. Why couldn't they detect the shuttle before, when it flew from space, from behind the ship, along side it, and then all the way to the front of the ship?
2. Only service drones detected them, and that was after they dropped off the shuttle.
#23
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 09:22
Optimystic_X wrote...
smudboy wrote...
I, too, find puffy shirts + Shakespeare to be gay. Never gets old, though.
Funny, I could have sworn it had something to do with sexual orientation.
You know what? I already know what kind of person I'm talking to. Enjoy your videos, kid.
There are 3 or so meanings to gay. It's one of those cool words, like ass. So sorry you can only see the homosexuality in it, though.
I know what? I'm so glad I noticed I am an intelligent, literary guru. I'm going to go enjoy some ******-erotic fanfiction.
#24
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 09:22
Mister Mida wrote...
Well, the shuttle does have cloaking capabilities.smudboy wrote...
Sleepicub09 wrote...
I'm sorry but if shuttle got too close to the entrance don't you think the broker would have shot it down?
1. Why couldn't they detect the shuttle before, when it flew from space, from behind the ship, along side it, and then all the way to the front of the ship?
2. Only service drones detected them, and that was after they dropped off the shuttle.
Lies!
#25
Posté 22 septembre 2010 - 09:25
yes true but in order drop the shuttle the normandy have to get close enough to even drop the shuttle the shadow broker might seen that; safer to just work your way up from the rear.smudboy wrote...
Sleepicub09 wrote...
I'm sorry but if shuttle got too close to the entrance don't you think the broker would have shot it down?
1. Why couldn't they detect the shuttle before, when it flew from space, from behind the ship, along side it, and then all the way to the front of the ship?
2. Only service drones detected them, and that was after they dropped off the shuttle.
not to mention that it doesn't even look like there was a viable lading zone at the front of the ship,





Retour en haut






