mosor wrote...
ryoldschool wrote...
This is exactly the question I wanted to figure out. I tried to compare the Tempest vs the Locust on squadmates. Ran thru the IFF mission ( before the core ).
Had all upgrades, playing soldier, with squad cryo on Insanity, on xbox. Shepard used the cryo ammo on all guns also, no heavy weapons ammo used.
Miranda and Samara ( both on SMG ) Tempest 981, Locust 960
Miranda and Kasumi ( both on SMG ) Tempest 947, Locust 991
Mordin and Kasumi ( both on SMG ) Tempest 983, Locust 934
Measured the seconds to clear the areas ( skipping cutscenes )
They do a lot of shooting on this map, and only have to worry about the Scions killing them as long as you keep them close to you. You do a lot of shooting also. It looks like the other gameplay factors matter more than the difference in the SMG - neither is superior.
Not really a good location to judge SMG's because it all depends on how long does it take for cryo to kick in. With a carnifiex pistol it's 1 shot, with the smg, it's a lot more random. With the numbers as is though, your numbers are not really statistically significant when factoring in margin of error, which is going to be much greater than 3%.
Thats what I was trying to explain to him was that by using a "sample" with that many variables makes any sort of true calculation or evaluation nearly impossible. As I said, its hard enough to simply sit and watch your squad fire weapons from cover while NOT shooting, and count their shots, factor in if they killed target or not(which changes how long they obviously will continue to stay out of cover and shoot), and how likely they are to get hit because of the burst time-to cover and damage dealt.
Without cutting down on the # of variables you'll never really know. AI's have such a rudimentary level of programed scripting compared to human consistancy of action(how often are you REALLY able to do something EXACTLY the same over and over and over?) that simply letting the AI do what it does and making observations on that alone is far more effective as its far more consistent and less varied in action than humans.





Retour en haut







