Warriors can do everything rogues do better it seems?
This not a troll and not intended as one.
Modifié par Acharnae, 23 septembre 2010 - 06:34 .
Guest_Acharnae_*
Modifié par Acharnae, 23 septembre 2010 - 06:34 .
Modifié par Zondergrod, 23 septembre 2010 - 06:52 .
Guest_Acharnae_*
Modifié par termokanden, 23 septembre 2010 - 07:19 .
Modifié par Zy-El, 24 septembre 2010 - 06:21 .
LadyJaneGrey wrote...
Because you can summon an awesome bear and ride him into battle, singing and shooting arrows all the while...
Okay, not really, but it makes a great mental picture. Any enemies would be too "???" to defend themselves against the party's attacks.
LadyJaneGrey wrote...
Because you can summon an awesome bear and ride him into battle, singing and shooting arrows all the while...
Okay, not really, but it makes a great mental picture. Any enemies would be too "???" to defend themselves against the party's attacks.
Sinistrom wrote...
LadyJaneGrey wrote...
Because you can summon an awesome bear and ride him into battle, singing and shooting arrows all the while...
Okay, not really, but it makes a great mental picture. Any enemies would be too "???" to defend themselves against the party's attacks.
.......
That would be the Best Fight Ever. Personaly I LOVE warriors, but the rouge give me a whole lot of experience that i would not have gained otherwis. Also, see above fight. Think about it. Think about it hard.
P.S. LadyJaneGrey, you have inspired me to make a Bard/Ranger (usually I just go for Assassin/Duelist) THANKS!
Yes. You can ignore all the other benefits of a rogue and this would STILL make them worth while.Zy-El wrote...
Backstabbing. Nobody here mentioned backstabbing.
Acharnae wrote...
Really apart from opening locked chests/find traps, is there a meaning to their existance?
Warriors can do everything rogues do better it seems?
This not a troll and not intended as one.
Modifié par Ahzrei, 26 septembre 2010 - 09:08 .
Modifié par Asepsis, 26 septembre 2010 - 02:41 .
Guest_Acharnae_*