horacethegrey wrote...
mosor wrote...
He doesn't quite seem like the greateful sort to me. Kinda like Khalisah al-Jilani. You just can't really with with them. He's just as likely to take that humiliation and channel it into being a bigger anti-human ******.
Doesn't matter if he's grateful or not, the fact is Shepard saved him. An incident like that is sure to get on the news. And a number of the alien population of the Citadel are sure to look at humans in a better light if a human Spectre was willing to protect a ardent human racist from harm.
The moment Talid starts acting like an ungrateful ******, people are sure to call him out on it and his public image will be damaged. Remember, image is everything to a politician.
Sadly, if there's one thing that that democracy and race politics have shown in history, it's that even public individual acts by the groups being rallied against don't overturn a politician. If it were that simple, then race politics wouldn't work, rather than being a timeless populist model.
Commander Shepard saved Talid. So what? It doesn't disprove anything about humans: the assassination, after all, was started by a human. Talid simply points to Shepard as an exception of humanity (which he/she is), and then goes on blasting humans in general while every once in a while covering his ass with some concession that there may be a few good humans, but they're so outnumbered by the majority, etc. etc. etc. And considering that Shepard doesn't live on the Citadel, while the sort of humans who tried to have Talid assassinated do, exposure over time doesn't favor the brief visitor.
Saving Talid simply means that he lives to do whatever he wants, including keeping on rallying against humans, something he's more than happy to do regardless of the Council situation. Shepard saving Talid solely as a favor to another alien doesn't prevent anything.
People can point to saving Talid as simply an attempt to quell anti-human sentiment. That might work if Talid was the only motivator of it. But he isn't. You can rightfully fear blowback of letting him be killed (or killing him yourself), but I don't think anyone here has appreciated how entrenched and insitutionalized he can make his position if he does win office. Once a demagogue takes office, his influence, appeal, and ability to harm become much, much greater.
If Joram wins on his anti-human ticket, that's going to be a major facet of politics for the foreseeable future. Killing him, or letting him die, may or may not flame future sentiment: history is too mixed to tell for certain without local context. Letting him take office, however, enables and preserves it now.
mosor wrote...As for using the shadow broker. From my experience, if you don't solve the problem yourself, then and there, it doesn't really get solved.
But that's the beauty of it. Liara can deal with the dirty stuff that Shepard can't deal with personally. There are situations where Shepard's presence may cause a fuss, such as exposing a dirty politician. But with Liara working behind the scenes, Shepard can shift the odds to his/her favor without getting his hands dirty.
I'm sorry, you
want Liara to become a comitted extortionist, blackmailer, and crime lord?
I mean, sure, I think it's for the best to, but I'm a renegade player mostly, and I'm not a great fan.
Modifié par Dean_the_Young, 26 septembre 2010 - 05:41 .