[quote]iakus wrote...
Nope. She says something like "If I must punish a killer, do I need to know he was kind to his family?" (I'll have to see if I can find the actual quote) She literaly didn't need to know anything besides "shoot Collectors"[/quote]
She does still presumably need to know they are a killer, not merely to assume they are. Otherwise, Justicars are merely psychotic, and that doesn't seem to be the case. To the contrary, her vouching for the evidence that Shepard provides regarding the killer, evidence she herself has not examined, and only having just met Shepard,
and the detective accepting that as admissable under Asari law strongly suggest there is more to Justicars than random hunches. Pre- or post cognitive intuition does not need to 'know if someone was kind to their family' to know they are a killer. It is simply 'knowing they are a killer' by whatever means.... mind reading, aura reading, literally seeing an aspect of the past or future.. the precise mechanism does not matter. It is
knowing by way of psychic ability. Not knowing the details is one of the main reasons why precogs (sci-fi or fantasy) traditionally speak crypticly.
[quote]Eh, I think the fact that she's more bark than bite is a writer's thing. They wanted "cool", "dark" and "edgy" without making Jack
too "dark and edgy" and actually start killing people. She's a killer, but she's
our killer. She's as random and as violent as the writers thought players could take and still sympathize with her.[/quote]
You do realize that she is a fictional character, and everything about her is 'the writer's thing'.... Why do people talk about these characters as if they have some sort of existance of the page? As if they are some real character that the writer is writing about but 'getting it wrong?' You do realize reputations don't have to equate to fact? Never heard of 'the Dread Pirate Roberts?'
[quote]Heh, I'm just an idea man. A reader, not a writer

as to the hyppothetical files: the Collectors are known in the Terminus Systems, if more through rumor and legend than any hard facts. Thane himself said he knew of the Collectors "by reputation" when you first meet him. It would only make sense to seek out whatever scraps of information might be floating out theere. Part of what bugs me in ME 2 is that Okeer is the only attempt to actually find some actual firsthand knowledge of the Collectors.[/quote][/quote]
He is an assassin, not an archaeologist or information broker. The collectors show up rarely and there are no indications that they hire assassins. Why would he study a group that are neither likely to be a client or target, yet could become a threat if he poked into their business? Even though it is not known to be the collectors behind it, it is a safe bet that it is known that colonies are disappearing. As such, when told by a reputable source that the collectors are behind it, why wouldn't he believe it? If he is looking to redeem himself by being more selective in contracts in his final years, why wouldn't he see it as a good opportunity?
What you seem to be saying is that it is more believable to you that he would know what the collectors are up to (generally, i.e. behind the abductions) than for him to know Shepard's reputation or real role in the Citadel war. Unlike the collectors, Shepard is a potential client or target, and it is reasonable to believe that Thane has sufficient contacts to know Shepard really was instrumental in saving the Citadel.