"a) It doesn't actually help humanity by mass sacrificing people especially since he went out of his way to resurrect you in the first place to prevent it from happening.

It would be impossible to control, how could he 'ensure it's loyalty'? Free cheeseburgers?
c) You don't actually need to make a Reaper in order to understand how it works, in fact, it's weapons and shielding are more important to understand than an actual Reaper itself save for how Indoctrination works... and even then you don't need to construct one.
d) The resources needed to make one are colossal, even if TIM had the mind too, how would he abduct millions plus humans with an organisation numbering below 200? Free cheeseburgers?
e) If humanity advanced to Reaper-shell, it probably wouldn't be called 'humanity' any more, so in effect TIM would have failed his stated goals.
f) TIM couldn't ensure that his own people would necessarily be on board with the plan anyway. It's probably one thing for people to get desperate and experiment on children, but mass liquification is on another level altogether."
The issue here is that you are posting logical reasons why he shouldn't build a Reaper. I don't trust TIM to be logical.
"I don't care what wikipedia says. Post your own analysis of TIM and use it to convince me that he is going to build a Reaper."
What do you mean? It was those factors that brought me to believe that he was going to try/consider building a Reaper.
Modifié par scotchtape622, 06 octobre 2010 - 04:14 .