Aller au contenu

Photo

The Collector Base Argument Thread: Because It's Going To Happen, So It Might As Well Be In One Place (tm)


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
2146 réponses à ce sujet

#1351
Icinix

Icinix
  • Members
  • 8 188 messages

Terastar wrote...

The way I was thinking when I destroyed the base was along this line.
Shep knew that the Reapers left a path to follow so that they could come back every 50,000 years.
When we jumped through the Mass 4 Relay and we seen all of them other ships from ancient times to assumed present times my Shep started wondering if all the other times that past civilizations must have came through that relay just as we did. My Shep truly wants to break the cycle so that means that my Shep must do something that the other past civilizations did not do in order to break free of the cycle. Since the base was there my Shep assumed that every other past civilizations must have chosen to try and keep the base for themselves so my Shep said goodbye base.


That is an awesome line of thinking.
A race was re-purposed between each harvesting, leaving the base intact, just with new owners.  Whats to say that other races didn't capture it and get indoctrinated?
So do something that maybe hasn't been done in other cycles.  Blow it up.

Modifié par Icinix, 09 octobre 2010 - 12:58 .


#1352
Markinator_123

Markinator_123
  • Members
  • 773 messages
It is amazing that people are so worried about the Illusive man. The council does not give a crap about human interests. If you listen to Anderson in ME1, you should know that council likes to benefit from humanity but as soon as humanity becomes an inconvience they abandon them. If you listen to news reports, you learn that Anderson wanted to investigate the colony attacks (if you put him on the council) but he lost 3-1. The other 3 council members claim that humanity should handle its own problems. Cerberus is helping humanity deal with its own problems. Let me just say that a paragon Shepard (one who saves the council and destroys the collector base) is kind of a traitor to humanity because there will never be equality.

#1353
General User

General User
  • Members
  • 3 315 messages

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Well, actually, there is a point to pf17456's assertion. I, for one, was kinda going to blow up the Base, on my first playthrough, but TIM's words weighed in. He is in a position to make more informed desisions, than Shepard, and *my* Shepard has to accept that. Because that's how the universe works. Some people sit there high and warm and make decisions, and some go in the sh*t and execute them. But everyone can choose where their loyalties are. Even putting all the gung-ho humanism aside, TIM comes across as an intelligent person who knows what he is doing, unlike any other authority (including non-Council races) Shepard meets in ME2.



I experienced something similar recently, only in the opposite direction. I was about to save the base when Samara, who for some reason I had never brought to the final showdown before, voiced an objection. I didn’t find her reasoning compelling in the slightest, I thought it a bit silly actually. But because it was Samara of all people objecting I didn’t save the base. Samara can speak with a moral authority born of dedication and introspection and a wisdom born of experience no other character in ME can come close to mustering. She has a perspective broader than anyone else can claim. Her opinion on a matter is (almost) enough to change mine by itself, and since I’m a base-boomer to begin with I’d have blown it if she gave me a disapproving look.

#1354
Markinator_123

Markinator_123
  • Members
  • 773 messages

General User wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Well, actually, there is a point to pf17456's assertion. I, for one, was kinda going to blow up the Base, on my first playthrough, but TIM's words weighed in. He is in a position to make more informed desisions, than Shepard, and *my* Shepard has to accept that. Because that's how the universe works. Some people sit there high and warm and make decisions, and some go in the sh*t and execute them. But everyone can choose where their loyalties are. Even putting all the gung-ho humanism aside, TIM comes across as an intelligent person who knows what he is doing, unlike any other authority (including non-Council races) Shepard meets in ME2.



I experienced something similar recently, only in the opposite direction. I was about to save the base when Samara, who for some reason I had never brought to the final showdown before, voiced an objection. I didn’t find her reasoning compelling in the slightest, I thought it a bit silly actually. But because it was Samara of all people objecting I didn’t save the base. Samara can speak with a moral authority born of dedication and introspection and a wisdom born of experience no other character in ME can come close to mustering. She has a perspective broader than anyone else can claim. Her opinion on a matter is (almost) enough to change mine by itself, and since I’m a base-boomer to begin with I’d have blown it if she gave me a disapproving look.


But Samara is just some lawful stupid Justicar.

#1355
mosor

mosor
  • Members
  • 1 372 messages

Icinix wrote...


That is an awesome line of thinking.
A race was re-purposed between each harvesting, leaving the base intact, just with new owners.  Whats to say that other races didn't capture it and get indoctrinated?
So do something that maybe hasn't been done in other cycles.  Blow it up.


Whose to say someone didn't blow it up before if you want to engage that line of reasoning?  It very well could have been rebuit. Especially considering, it looks more like a hive that fits more with the insectoid collectors than a reaper cuttlefish.

#1356
Flamewielder

Flamewielder
  • Members
  • 1 475 messages

Terastar wrote...
The way I was thinking when I destroyed the base was along this line.
Shep knew that the Reapers left a path to follow so that they could come back every 50,000 years.
When we jumped through the Mass 4 Relay and we seen all of them other ships from ancient times to assumed present times my Shep started wondering if all the other times that past civilizations must have came through that relay just as we did. My Shep truly wants to break the cycle so that means that my Shep must do something that the other past civilizations did not do in order to break free of the cycle. Since the base was there my Shep assumed that every other past civilizations must have chosen to try and keep the base for themselves so my Shep said goodbye base.

You're assuming that at least one or more of these civilizations made it to the base without the necessary IFF... a BIG assumption. As far as we know, the Reaper's plan A (jump to Citadel, take over Mass Relays, reap Galaxy) has never failed in the past... It is far more likely that none ever successfully navigated the Omega-4 relay and never knew of the base's existence.

#1357
General User

General User
  • Members
  • 3 315 messages

Icinix wrote...


The council is still bigger on equality than Cerberus is.  Which is a start.  I think I covered most of my thoughts with my last posts in regard to this, but, it is only a start.  Metagaming has been thrown around a bit, but it isn't metagaming.  It's planning in general.  You set things up to cover all your bases, no pun intended.  You prepare for the worst, preparing everything you can (Rachni, Krogan, Council, Shadow Broker etc), but you can't plan for a loss, because you and everyone will be dead.  So you plan that you're going to win.  So you take away the ability of someone else, in this case TIM, to become a dominating force in the galaxy after the war, with the idea it will prevent a potential bloody war further down the track.

Once again, beyond the scope of what we'll see in Mass Effect games.  But just the mindset.



Sorry for the one line post but...well said! Posted Image

#1358
DPSSOC

DPSSOC
  • Members
  • 3 033 messages

Icinix wrote...

DPSSOC wrote...
Point of interest, in our history every time equality has been taken from the bottom, rather than handed from the top, it's been bloody.  By elevating humanity (or really any of the non-Council races) you allow for a relatively bloodless transition of power to the hands of those who know how and why the system doesn't work, and might be willing to change it.  The Council is not big on equality, and they won't be until some other power comes along and offers the ultimatum, level the playing field or die.  In other words, the inequality of the system won't be acknowledged until it directly inconveniences the Council.  Giving Cerberus the base could give humanity the edge it needs to be that inconvenience.


The council is still bigger on equality than Cerberus is.

 

Please point out where Cerberus says, "You can't do this task because you're turian."  The Council in ME1 is reluctant to make you a Spectre, not because of your qualifications but your race.  Cerberus on the other hand has no issue hiring Quarians, Asari, Drell, Salarians, etc. whoever happens to be the most qualified for the task.

Icinix wrote...
Metagaming has been thrown around a bit, but it isn't metagaming.  It's planning in general.  You set things up to cover all your bases, no pun intended.  You prepare for the worst, preparing everything you can (Rachni, Krogan, Council, Shadow Broker etc), but you can't plan for a loss, because you and everyone will be dead.  So you plan that you're going to win.  So you take away the ability of someone else, in this case TIM, to become a dominating force in the galaxy after the war, with the idea it will prevent a potential bloody war further down the track.

Once again, beyond the scope of what we'll see in Mass Effect games.  But just the mindset.


Now this is a reasonable mindset, and I agree it doesn't require metagaming, but it would seem you break the idea of "prepairing everything you can" when you destroy the base simply so Cerberus can't have it (if you've made other points as to why you destroy it ignore this I'm still catching up).  Personally though I don't see TIM trying to become a dominating power in the galaxy I see him continuing to do what he's done for nearly 3 decades; develope advancements for humanity and funnel them to the Alliance through various contacts and front organizations.  TIM, to me anyway, seems to be taking the long view so I find it more likely he'll advance and improve humanity's position to increase our political weight allowing us more freedom and control rather than kicking in the door to the Council chamber and declaring himself king.

#1359
General User

General User
  • Members
  • 3 315 messages

Markinator_123 wrote...

General User wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Well, actually, there is a point to pf17456's assertion. I, for one, was kinda going to blow up the Base, on my first playthrough, but TIM's words weighed in. He is in a position to make more informed desisions, than Shepard, and *my* Shepard has to accept that. Because that's how the universe works. Some people sit there high and warm and make decisions, and some go in the sh*t and execute them. But everyone can choose where their loyalties are. Even putting all the gung-ho humanism aside, TIM comes across as an intelligent person who knows what he is doing, unlike any other authority (including non-Council races) Shepard meets in ME2.



I experienced something similar recently, only in the opposite direction. I was about to save the base when Samara, who for some reason I had never brought to the final showdown before, voiced an objection. I didn’t find her reasoning compelling in the slightest, I thought it a bit silly actually. But because it was Samara of all people objecting I didn’t save the base. Samara can speak with a moral authority born of dedication and introspection and a wisdom born of experience no other character in ME can come close to mustering. She has a perspective broader than anyone else can claim. Her opinion on a matter is (almost) enough to change mine by itself, and since I’m a base-boomer to begin with I’d have blown it if she gave me a disapproving look.


But Samara is just some lawful stupid Justicar.



She’s certainly “focused” (that’s a diplomatic way of putting it), and she wouldn’t be my first choice to upgrade/redesign EDI, but "stupid" is rather unfair. She’s nearly 1000 years old and has been fighting various and sundry bad-guys since before my country was independent. As Legion would say “[she] has perspective we lack” deferring to her judgment is not unwise, especially in a situation like the CB where the right thing to do is not obvious.

#1360
Icinix

Icinix
  • Members
  • 8 188 messages
Sorry guys. I'm out of here. Managed to avoid work as long as I could :P

Thanks for the civil debate (Even though I didn't really intend to get into one) its been fun.



Keep Punching!

#1361
Flamewielder

Flamewielder
  • Members
  • 1 475 messages

mosor wrote...

Icinix wrote...
That is an awesome line of thinking.
A race was re-purposed between each harvesting, leaving the base intact, just with new owners.  Whats to say that other races didn't capture it and get indoctrinated?
So do something that maybe hasn't been done in other cycles.  Blow it up.

Whose to say someone didn't blow it up before if you want to engage that line of reasoning?  It very well could have been rebuit. Especially considering, it looks more like a hive that fits more with the insectoid collectors than a reaper cuttlefish.

I agree with mosor: the base and ship are so similar they were likely built in the same era . Both look like re-purposed asteroids, something cheaply built but resilient.

What little info is given about the Collectors suggests they've been around for a long time and were known to travel the Omega-4 relay long before the events of ME1, so the base was likely there before Sovereign failed in implementing "Plan A".

Was the base built after the Protheans were reaped? We don't know. The "hive" look suggests it was built by/for them. From the Prothean video logs in ME2, we know the Protheans were retconned to look like the Collectors so their current insectoid look is not a result of Reaper modification or gene-engineering.

In fact, the base may actually have been built by the Protheans PRIOR to the Reaper invasion and re-purposed by the Reapers subsequently. If it WAS built by the Reapers AFTER the Protheans were converted, one may wonder why they only bothered building it so recently... in other words, why suddenly bother with a plan B if plan A was allways successful?

Also, the Prothean architectural style we saw in ME1 displayed none of the "hive" features of the Collector base or ship. So the base and ship "hive" design may be unrelated to the Protheans/Collectors.

But enough speculation... back to topic.

#1362
General User

General User
  • Members
  • 3 315 messages

DPSSOC wrote...

Icinix wrote...

DPSSOC wrote...
Point of interest, in our history every time equality has been taken from the bottom, rather than handed from the top, it's been bloody.  By elevating humanity (or really any of the non-Council races) you allow for a relatively bloodless transition of power to the hands of those who know how and why the system doesn't work, and might be willing to change it.  The Council is not big on equality, and they won't be until some other power comes along and offers the ultimatum, level the playing field or die.  In other words, the inequality of the system won't be acknowledged until it directly inconveniences the Council.  Giving Cerberus the base could give humanity the edge it needs to be that inconvenience.


The council is still bigger on equality than Cerberus is.

 

Please point out where Cerberus says, "You can't do this task because you're turian."  The Council in ME1 is reluctant to make you a Spectre, not because of your qualifications but your race.  Cerberus on the other hand has no issue hiring Quarians, Asari, Drell, Salarians, etc. whoever happens to be the most qualified for the task.

 



What the hell, if Icinix isn’t here right now, I'll give this one a whack. 


Cerberus’ agenda may not be overtly racist per se but can you really see an alien running it? That’s a problem for some people (myself included) only because that truth is racially based and grounded in race politics. If Cerberus painted itself as the representatives of a sovereign nation and not a race, I gotta feel a fair deal of the antagonism towards it would evaporate.
 
Where the waters get muddy is on the idea that something that improves the position of humanity (or any race really) must degrade the position of another race. That line of thinking implies a zero-sum view of the universe that I cannot subscribe to. But again the race issue comes up. Some people (myself included) feel that anything that pits one race against one another, is anathema. Especially since the various races of ME have no real reason to be in competition (real or imagined) to begin with.

#1363
pf17456

pf17456
  • Members
  • 581 messages

Zulu_DFA wrote...

And finally, the mosor's assertion that  the paragons just do things primarily to make themselves feel better is there to a T!


What and renegades don't ?  Like it wasn't fun to set the Blood Pack Krogan ablaze or push the Eclipse merc out the window ?

Maybe paragons do what they do because of an underlying sense of guilt they're trying to appease but renegades do what they do because they have no sense of guilt, like sociopaths or they're rebelling against their sense of guilt because of daddy issues but either way both classes act to make themselves feel better.

The exception I found in the game is directly related to the decision regarding the CB where it's paragon to blow it up and renegade to keep it which seemed a little backwards to me and makes sense only when you take into account TIM  being renegade and you're agreeing with him.

In spite of the fact that Shepard, up to the point of making a decision about the CB, is ambivalent about Cerebrus TIM proceeds as if Shepard's decision about joining Cerebrus has already been made and he treats Shepard accordingly. All things considered; Ship, logo, TIM's 'direction/orders' , Miranda's comments about who's really in charge, ship survailence etc. Shepard does indeed work for Cerebrus and TIM releasing carefully disguised rumors about Shepard suggests he's either proud and has taken liberties with Shepard's reputation or he's being manipulative boxing Shepard into a corner. Shepard up to the point of the CB really has no other choice but to work for TIM and be his trophy or whatever, however that all changes when the options about the base arise. 
Blowing up the base is the only option provided in the game for Shepard to render an emphatic opinion about working for TIM and being used as a tool.                                                                                                                                   If Shepard explodes the base then Shepard is liberated and can assume a leadership role. If Shepard hands the base over to TIM then Shepard submits to TIM's authority, accepts a role as employee and relinquishes responsibility for whatever happens subsequently but will be accountable should TIM use it for some despicable purpose. On the other hand should the base proove to be the deciding factor in defeating the Reapers then the credit will go to TIM since it was his operation all along even though Shepard did the lifting. This is the renegade outcome.

#1364
Zulu_DFA

Zulu_DFA
  • Members
  • 8 217 messages

pf17456 wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...

And finally, the mosor's assertion that  the paragons just do things primarily to make themselves feel better is there to a T!


What and renegades don't ?  Like it wasn't fun to set the Blood Pack Krogan ablaze or push the Eclipse merc out the window ?


It wasn't fun to vent Shiala's head.

It wasn't fun to let Balak live instead of stomping his face in, after he killed those hostages.

It was a pity that those EA workers had to burn alive, but the mission comes first.

And yes, it wasn't fun to kill that merc, because every Human working for an alien employer and against the good guys Cerberus we are, is a sad reminder of what we have to put our lives on the line for every damn day - besides stopping the Reapers, of course.



pf17456 wrote...
If Shepard explodes the base then Shepard is liberated and can assume a leadership role. If Shepard hands the base over to TIM then Shepard submits to TIM's authority, accepts a role as employee and relinquishes responsibility for whatever happens subsequently but will be accountable should TIM use it for some despicable purpose. On the other hand should the base proove to be the deciding factor in defeating the Reapers then the credit will go to TIM since it was his operation all along even though Shepard did the lifting. This is the renegade outcome.

So, basically, you're ready to f*ck up the Galaxy only because the spoils of victory wouldn't go to you, and, if by chance the Galaxy still gets saved, you might be able to emerge as a self-made hero? Congratulations, you seem to have just set up a new Paragon Hypocrisy Record.

Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 09 octobre 2010 - 02:26 .


#1365
Inverness Moon

Inverness Moon
  • Members
  • 1 721 messages

General User wrote...

@Inverness Moon (awesome username btw)

No one has ever said that to me before... :wub:

Why do you say the Reaper threat is absolute? Is it because they’ve been successful in the past? It certainly means they’re serious about their threat but I don’t see exactly how that translates into them being able to carry it out.

As I mentioned before, both the Citadel and Alliance fleets were completely ineffective against just a single reaper. You seem to be implying that at this point, we have anything capable of stopping them. Pure military power isn't going to do it, especially not with our level of technology.

To the best of our knowledge the Reapers are in rather uncharted waters themselves and, despite all their advantages, they’ve failed so far due as much to their own blundering (processing Saren being the prime exhibit) as Shepards heroics.

The reapers might be in unfamiliar territory but it still doesn't mean our weapons will be any more effective against them.

I’m also not sure the Battle of the Citadel would be indicative of how future battles against the Reapers would progress. Sovereign had multiple geth ships acting in support roles and completely blindsided the Citadel Fleet. 5th Fleet had limited intel and (of course) zero experience against Reapers, all the while fighting in the midst of a friendly metropolis and thus only with conventional weapons.

That is a very good point that I hadn't considered before. Did anyone have any non-conventional weapons that couldn't have been used around the Citadel? But then again, dreadnoughts are how the various races measure their military power apparently. Sovereign's shields are strong enough to withstand fire from any dreadnought in any fleet. Assuming you could penetrate the shields if you combined the fire from multiple dreadnoughts, you still wouldn't have enough dreadnoughts in the galaxy to counter the number of reapers there are.

What made you come to the opposite conclusion? I can certainly understand how the relative “body counts” would be intimidating. That makes it all the more important to ask why Sovereign so successful against galactic forces at the Citadel? I say it was due to his physical advantages, advantages that are far from insurmountable even without the CB, especially a Cerberus controlled CB.

If it weren't for those obvious physical advantages I’d be downright dismissive of the Reapers as a threat at all. So I guess the question is: how big an advantage do you think they really have (in terms of technology, numbers, etc.)?

Now you're evaluating the risks of each course of action. Destroying the base and trying to do without it, or saving it and allowing Cerberus to tr y to get something out of it. The reapers are obviously a much greater threat than Cerberus, what makes you think you can afford to take the chance?

I believe there are certainly several times more reapers than we have dreadnoughts. Each reaper is more powerful than anything we have.

But anyways, elaborate on these physical advantages. Also consider that the weapon that was necessary to one-shot the derelict reaper carved a massive rift into the planet behind it.

I won’t disagree with you about the dangers indoctrination represents. Do you feel the CB will be necessary to at least give our counter-intel people at least the ability to identify sleeper agents? I don’t, counter-intel people tend to be a suspicious lot but far from unintelligent (a certain Alliance 5th Fleet NAVINT major notwithstanding) or incapable. The experience of the STG combined with a judicious application of natural abilities might be an effective screen for indoctrinated sleeper agents by themselves.

That is a baseless assumption. We have not experienced attacks by indoctrinated sleeper agents we have no idea how effective it will be or if the action is subconscious, etc.

Again, you're risking just about everything by assuming you'll be able to handle indoctrinated agents through normal methods, the reaper's methods are anything but normal.

Considering the ending of season 1 of Battlestar Galactica.

I love your idea about using the CB as a manufacturing centre! I’ve not see that before but it makes perfect sense, especially if it’s intact to begin with. A nano-machine weapon is speculative, but not unrealistic and, quite possibly, conceptually brilliant.

On a purely storytelling level, I do hope the Reapers don’t have a “death star exhaust pipe.” It just seems a cheap way disposing of them, little better than finding a prothean super-gun.

That is true. But I wasn't referring to a strictly physical weakness, but more like one that is the result of how they're made or how their mind works. I don't know. =P

Also, I've read one fanfic where a duplicate Citadel relay was used to lure the reapers into a supernova, specifically one resulting from the destruction of Dholen, the star that Haestrom orbits.

#1366
pf17456

pf17456
  • Members
  • 581 messages
[quote]Zulu_DFA wrote...

[quote]pf17456 wrote...

[quote]Zulu_DFA wrote...

And finally, the mosor's assertion that  the paragons just do things primarily to make themselves feel better is there to a T![/quote]

What and renegades don't ?  Like it wasn't fun to set the Blood Pack Krogan ablaze or push the Eclipse merc out the window ?
[/quote]

It wasn't fun to vent Shiala's head.

It wasn't fun to let Balak live instead of stomping his face in, after he killed those hostages.

It was a pity that those EA workers had to burn alive, but the mission comes first.

And yes, it wasn't fun to kill that merc, because every Human working for an alien employer and against the good guys Cerberus we are, is a sad reminder of what we have to put our lives on the line for every damn day - besides stopping the Reapers, of course.



Yes I'm sure you had a box of tissues close by to wipe away the tears.

Just not sure if the tears were from laughter or sorrow

#1367
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

No Base and no new Council = Humanity screwed.


Why screwed?



And finally, the mosor's assertion that the paragons just do things primarily to make themselves feel better is there to a T!


Damn, we have a lot of telepaths saying this. Let me just say right here that my own Paragon's decision here was based on trying to get the best possible outcome out of whatever situations she can.

#1368
GuardianAngel470

GuardianAngel470
  • Members
  • 4 922 messages

Inverness Moon wrote...

General User wrote...

@Inverness Moon (awesome username btw)

No one has ever said that to me before... :wub:

Why do you say the Reaper threat is absolute? Is it because they’ve been successful in the past? It certainly means they’re serious about their threat but I don’t see exactly how that translates into them being able to carry it out.

As I mentioned before, both the Citadel and Alliance fleets were completely ineffective against just a single reaper. You seem to be implying that at this point, we have anything capable of stopping them. Pure military power isn't going to do it, especially not with our level of technology.

To the best of our knowledge the Reapers are in rather uncharted waters themselves and, despite all their advantages, they’ve failed so far due as much to their own blundering (processing Saren being the prime exhibit) as Shepards heroics.

The reapers might be in unfamiliar territory but it still doesn't mean our weapons will be any more effective against them.

I’m also not sure the Battle of the Citadel would be indicative of how future battles against the Reapers would progress. Sovereign had multiple geth ships acting in support roles and completely blindsided the Citadel Fleet. 5th Fleet had limited intel and (of course) zero experience against Reapers, all the while fighting in the midst of a friendly metropolis and thus only with conventional weapons.

That is a very good point that I hadn't considered before. Did anyone have any non-conventional weapons that couldn't have been used around the Citadel? But then again, dreadnoughts are how the various races measure their military power apparently. Sovereign's shields are strong enough to withstand fire from any dreadnought in any fleet. Assuming you could penetrate the shields if you combined the fire from multiple dreadnoughts, you still wouldn't have enough dreadnoughts in the galaxy to counter the number of reapers there are.

What made you come to the opposite conclusion? I can certainly understand how the relative “body counts” would be intimidating. That makes it all the more important to ask why Sovereign so successful against galactic forces at the Citadel? I say it was due to his physical advantages, advantages that are far from insurmountable even without the CB, especially a Cerberus controlled CB.

If it weren't for those obvious physical advantages I’d be downright dismissive of the Reapers as a threat at all. So I guess the question is: how big an advantage do you think they really have (in terms of technology, numbers, etc.)?

Now you're evaluating the risks of each course of action. Destroying the base and trying to do without it, or saving it and allowing Cerberus to tr y to get something out of it. The reapers are obviously a much greater threat than Cerberus, what makes you think you can afford to take the chance?

I believe there are certainly several times more reapers than we have dreadnoughts. Each reaper is more powerful than anything we have.

But anyways, elaborate on these physical advantages. Also consider that the weapon that was necessary to one-shot the derelict reaper carved a massive rift into the planet behind it.

I won’t disagree with you about the dangers indoctrination represents. Do you feel the CB will be necessary to at least give our counter-intel people at least the ability to identify sleeper agents? I don’t, counter-intel people tend to be a suspicious lot but far from unintelligent (a certain Alliance 5th Fleet NAVINT major notwithstanding) or incapable. The experience of the STG combined with a judicious application of natural abilities might be an effective screen for indoctrinated sleeper agents by themselves.

That is a baseless assumption. We have not experienced attacks by indoctrinated sleeper agents we have no idea how effective it will be or if the action is subconscious, etc.

Again, you're risking just about everything by assuming you'll be able to handle indoctrinated agents through normal methods, the reaper's methods are anything but normal.

Considering the ending of season 1 of Battlestar Galactica.

I love your idea about using the CB as a manufacturing centre! I’ve not see that before but it makes perfect sense, especially if it’s intact to begin with. A nano-machine weapon is speculative, but not unrealistic and, quite possibly, conceptually brilliant.

On a purely storytelling level, I do hope the Reapers don’t have a “death star exhaust pipe.” It just seems a cheap way disposing of them, little better than finding a prothean super-gun.

That is true. But I wasn't referring to a strictly physical weakness, but more like one that is the result of how they're made or how their mind works. I don't know. =P

Also, I've read one fanfic where a duplicate Citadel relay was used to lure the reapers into a supernova, specifically one resulting from the destruction of Dholen, the star that Haestrom orbits.

Not trying to get too far into this debate, I've already stated my opinion, but it is clear that it wouldn't be hard to detect a sleeper agent if you had a scanner nearby.

Vigil was able to easily detect that Shepard wasn't indoctrinated as well as the fact that Saren was. Vigil was created by scientists who had no actual exposure to indoctrinated people.  I don't think this is a valid advantage for keeping the collector base.

Learning to understand indocrination and being able to reverse it might be, but not the ability to identify it.

#1369
GuardianAngel470

GuardianAngel470
  • Members
  • 4 922 messages

Xilizhra wrote...


No Base and no new Council = Humanity screwed.

Why screwed?


And finally, the mosor's assertion that the paragons just do things primarily to make themselves feel better is there to a T!

Damn, we have a lot of telepaths saying this. Let me just say right here that my own Paragon's decision here was based on trying to get the best possible outcome out of whatever situations she can.


And mine was based on logic. You may not agree with it, but I didn't do because I felt guilty.

#1370
pf17456

pf17456
  • Members
  • 581 messages

Zulu_DFA wrote...



pf17456 wrote...
If Shepard explodes the base then Shepard is liberated and can assume a leadership role. If Shepard hands the base over to TIM then Shepard submits to TIM's authority, accepts a role as employee and relinquishes responsibility for whatever happens subsequently but will be accountable should TIM use it for some despicable purpose. On the other hand should the base proove to be the deciding factor in defeating the Reapers then the credit will go to TIM since it was his operation all along even though Shepard did the lifting. This is the renegade outcome.

So, basically, you're ready to f*ck up the Galaxy only because the spoils of victory wouldn't go to you, and, if by chance the Galaxy still gets saved, you might be able to emerge as a self-made hero? Congratulations, you seem to have just set up a new Paragon Hypocrisy Record.


Nope I'm saying that whatever happens I'm willing to own the responsibility. I'm not willing to pawn it off on someone else especially if I don't know where they're coming from.

#1371
Arijharn

Arijharn
  • Members
  • 2 850 messages
The thing is, for the most part I feel paragon decisions are something like this, indulge me a bit by reading my story:
The space station is collapsing, everything is exploding. Cmdr. Shephard runs to the shuttle with his cohorts quick in step behind him. That's strange, you can hear something... a meowing. A cat is stuck in a tree.
"Shephard!" Garrus shouts, barely able to be heard above the blaring klaxons, "We have to get out of here!"
EDI chimes in, warning that the space station will completely destroy itself very soon, probably in less than a minute judging by the station's core.
Meow.
Damn that cat! Shephard sighs and climbs up the tree to fetch it.
Garrus blanches
"You have got to be ****ing kidding me Shephard! You're risking all of our lives just to get a cat?!"

Modifié par Arijharn, 09 octobre 2010 - 03:01 .


#1372
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages
Nah, my Adept Shepard can just use Lift to get the cat out. In any case, I wouldn't keep doing it if it didn't keep working.

#1373
Mr. Gogeta34

Mr. Gogeta34
  • Members
  • 4 033 messages
It's funny to hear assumptions that keeping the base or destroying it is something "Renegades" or "Paragons" do.
I'm a full Paragon and I still kept the base.

Fact is that the limits of TIM's power has been evident by his failures, Miranda, and EDI's intel.  Miranda's one of TIM's inner circle members and could very well know where he is or how to find him... but if nothing else she knows how Cerberus works.  Keeping the base I don't see as a big risk with regards to what TIM may do with it as again he's the only one preparing for the Reapers.

You could hold out wishing that the council will come around but you don't know any of that at the time you have to make the choice.  They've already made a completely tight story to explain Sovereign and have just let the event get lost in history.  Even showing them a picture wouldn't stop that line of thinking (that it was a machine built by Saren and his Geth or that it's just Geth ships).

Taking the Reapers seriously, as well as during war time, capturing a base is worth more than a destroyed one every time.  Especially considering our task and only knowable way of beating the Reapers is understanding and safeguarding against their technology.

P.S.  Those who feel like keeping the base is bending over for TIM.  That's better than bending over for the Turian council member (who also think humans have puny, feeble minds)... watch out for the acid Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image

Modifié par Mr. Gogeta34, 09 octobre 2010 - 02:52 .


#1374
Zulu_DFA

Zulu_DFA
  • Members
  • 8 217 messages

Xilizhra wrote...



No Base and no new Council = Humanity screwed.

Why screwed?

Because without power it will be demoted to the Turian Hierarhy's client state or something.


Xilizhra wrote...

And finally, the mosor's assertion that the paragons just do things primarily to make themselves feel better is there to a T!

Damn, we have a lot of telepaths saying this. Let me just say right here that my own Paragon's decision here was based on trying to get the best possible outcome out of whatever situations she can.

BS. By blowing things up you don't try to achieve the best possible result, you try to avoid the worst one. That's behind blowing up the Heretics station, behind erasing genopahge cure data, behind creating political crysis in the Vagrant Fleet. It's the right call, when the danger is real. But sometimes the danger exists only in your imagination, so blowing things up is the wrong call. The renegade argument in the Collector Base choice is: by letting your irrational fears overtake and make you blow up the Base, you pass up the best possible outcome (or even the only chance there is).

Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 09 octobre 2010 - 03:01 .


#1375
Zulu_DFA

Zulu_DFA
  • Members
  • 8 217 messages

pf17456 wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...



pf17456 wrote...
If Shepard explodes the base then Shepard is liberated and can assume a leadership role. If Shepard hands the base over to TIM then Shepard submits to TIM's authority, accepts a role as employee and relinquishes responsibility for whatever happens subsequently but will be accountable should TIM use it for some despicable purpose. On the other hand should the base proove to be the deciding factor in defeating the Reapers then the credit will go to TIM since it was his operation all along even though Shepard did the lifting. This is the renegade outcome.

So, basically, you're ready to f*ck up the Galaxy only because the spoils of victory wouldn't go to you, and, if by chance the Galaxy still gets saved, you might be able to emerge as a self-made hero? Congratulations, you seem to have just set up a new Paragon Hypocrisy Record.


Nope I'm saying that whatever happens I'm willing to own the responsibility. I'm not willing to pawn it off on someone else especially if I don't know where they're coming from.


How kind and noble of you to take on the responsibility for the upcoming galactic extinction, brave sir! That'll sure console all the folks out there when they are liquified into Reaper alloy, of coughing their alien lungs out.