383 réponses à ce sujet

[Russalka]

It's baaaaaaack.

Inciting arguments is a totally innocent behaviour, isn't it?

And calling every man and woman expressing their distaste and disagreement rabid fan girls is kind of trollish.

[SirShreK]

MariSkep wrote...

Mecha Tengu wrote...

uuuhcantthinkofaname wrote...

Cool idea, but it will never happen.

raged girl gamers and femminist community would sue, cause negative publicity

You must have some real issues with women, mate.

Did you just prove him right?

[shootist70]

Lukas Kristjanson wrote...

Smartass: I am amused that there are some who are generally opposed to revealing armor, but would make an exception if the character had a reason. As though observers would be thinking "Oh, it's a cultural thing? Then I shant be titilated." Would the character have to make the viewer aware before the distinction could be made, so as to avoid some sort of quantum state of arousal/unarousal? Perhaps a pamphlet entitled “Upon my Preference for Showing the Goods.”

Looking around the thread the reason seems fairly obvious, and it all comes down to that suspension-of-disbelief thing again. Whether the player is titilated or not, when you start throwing nakedness around in an overtly gratuitous manner it might seem so overly self-indulgent that some will cringe while playing it. If it's done within a decent context then we can allow ourselves the pleasure without feeling like a moron for playing it. But that goes for just about every decent fictional creation that allows us to enjoy the human form.

Serious: I’m sure we’ll have opportunity for sexiness that both appeases and offends depending on your nature, but in general, the more armored you are, the more armor you are wearing. That’s a design choice to support the mechanics/appearance of the IP and give clarity to players. And Origins did have some juggling between the benefits of mobility versus raw protection, so we'll probably have similar tradeoffs this time around.

Gawd, I hope so. I never really was into the clanking tin-cans that are more from overly romanticised neo-medieval fiction, than the metal mass that a squire would take an hour buckling a knight into before a set-piece battle or jousting tourney only.

Modifié par shootist70, 27 septembre 2010 - 10:38 .

[NKKKK]

She was telling me to troll harder, so I did, and look around 2 pages worth of spam because of it.

So yeah, I'm the one that's gonna get this back on topic now, ironically. We disagree, but it wouldn't be bothersome to have it as an option in a future game, with little to no stats, for both sexes.

Now then, if you think having it in the game is already offensive, you're just being silly.

Modifié par NKKKK, 27 septembre 2010 - 10:38 .

[Mecha Tengu]

SirShreK wrote...

MariSkep wrote...

Mecha Tengu wrote...

uuuhcantthinkofaname wrote...

Cool idea, but it will never happen.

raged girl gamers and femminist community would sue, cause negative publicity

You must have some real issues with women, mate.

Did you just prove him right?

nah hes a man.

[Russalka]

@NKKKK So you weren't the more intelligent one and kept on going? Go you. This thread is getting locked anyway.

Modifié par Russalka, 27 septembre 2010 - 10:39 .

[joriandrake]

Mecha Tengu wrote...

uuuhcantthinkofaname wrote...

Cool idea, but it will never happen.

raged girl gamers and femminist community would sue, cause negative publicity

never will happen in our time ever

i am all for equality almost in everything, rights, jobs, payment, games, nudeness and clothing in game, justice, jokes, "positions"

as it turned out in these few pages we know even girls don't all oppose having metal bikinis, considering that they wear real bikinis this makes those who oppose the idea a bit more hypocritical if they base their position on the looks

In the end it is up to the developers, so all we can hope is that they read the topic and agree with those who wish to see such items in the game

Heck my own girlfriend wears on her own such bikinis when going to real RPG ( i think its called gurps or what in english)

Modifié par joriandrake, 27 septembre 2010 - 10:42 .

[Russalka]

Bioware has already said no to plate bikinis.

[Mecha Tengu]

Russalka wrote...

Bioware has already said no to plate bikinis.

then why still rage over tight leather clothing and huge busts

[NKKKK]

Russalka, you keep bringing the issue back.

as it turned out in these few pages we know even girls don't all oppose having metal bikinis, considering that they wear real bikinis this makes those who oppose the idea a bit more hypocritical if they base their position on the looks

Yup, but I supposed we can make it fair to both sexes.

[Russalka]

Who was against leather clothing?

[joriandrake]

Mecha Tengu wrote...

Russalka wrote...

Bioware has already said no to plate bikinis.

then why still rage over tight leather clothing and huge busts

there are people who want those also get removed

[Dave of Canada]

Mecha Tengu wrote...

Russalka wrote...

Bioware has already said no to plate bikinis.

then why still rage over tight leather clothing and huge busts

Because that's an entirely different debate?

"The oilspill in the gulf is finished, why rage over people cutting down the rainforests?"

[SirShreK]

Mecha Tengu wrote...

SirShreK wrote...

MariSkep wrote...

Mecha Tengu wrote...

uuuhcantthinkofaname wrote...

Cool idea, but it will never happen.

raged girl gamers and femminist community would sue, cause negative publicity

You must have some real issues with women, mate.

Did you just prove him right?

nah hes a man.

[Mecha Tengu]

Russalka wrote...

Who was against leather clothing?

chainmail/leather on the verge of looking like a bikini

[Russalka]

Yes, who was against it?

[Mecha Tengu]

Dave of Canada wrote...

Mecha Tengu wrote...

Russalka wrote...

Bioware has already said no to plate bikinis.

then why still rage over tight leather clothing and huge busts

Because that's an entirely different debate?

"The oilspill in the gulf is finished, why rage over people cutting down the rainforests?"

hello dave  I see you have answered the call of duty

[Anarya]

NKKKK wrote...

She was telling me to troll harder, so I did, and look around 2 pages worth of spam because of it.

So yeah, I'm the one that's gonna get this back on topic now, ironically. We disagree, but it wouldn't be bothersome to have it as an option in a future game, with little to no stats, for both sexes.

Now then, if you think having it in the game is already offensive, you're just being silly.

I was actually encouraging you to give up.

[NKKKK]

[quote]chainmail/leather on the verge of looking like a bikini[/quote]

Where? I've seen nothing of the sort.

[quote]I was actually encouraging you to give up. [quote]

lol

Modifié par NKKKK, 27 septembre 2010 - 10:45 .

[Mecha Tengu]

MariSkep wrote...

Mecha Tengu wrote...

Russalka wrote...

Bioware has already said no to plate bikinis.

then why still rage over tight leather clothing and huge busts

Immersion. Some of us aren't jacking off while playing these games.

some of us won't complain over 3d animations and graphics being "unrealistic"

[joriandrake]

NKKKK wrote...

Yup, but I supposed we can make it fair to both sexes.

I don't speak for the others, but when I said add these clothes and armor I never meant to at the same time remove more realistic ones. The two can co-exist in the same game. I am just as fine with having tincan armors for man and women as having tanga for man and women in the game, it doesn't mean I will use them but I don't try to block others from their own wishes coming true.