Killing Aesgareth - Any reason not to?
#1
Posté 28 septembre 2010 - 06:24
I'm guessing not, since WK is just an optional area, however, I don't know, as I believe I let him live before.
On one side, doing so is obviously morally dubious (and as he says, poor sport), and my character is supposed to be a good guy. On the other hand, I DO want the Deck Of Many Things, and there doesn't seem to be any other way to get it.
#2
Posté 28 septembre 2010 - 07:08
#3
Posté 29 septembre 2010 - 09:53
Do what Keldorn would do.
Modifié par virumor, 29 septembre 2010 - 09:54 .
#4
Posté 29 septembre 2010 - 01:09
I think any CN person would actually take a roleplaying choice of gambling rather than attacking.
#5
Posté 29 septembre 2010 - 01:16
And I would vote for gambling and win as much as you can, then killing him.
Modifié par virumor, 29 septembre 2010 - 01:17 .
#6
Posté 29 septembre 2010 - 01:43
#7
Posté 29 septembre 2010 - 02:16
#8
Posté 29 septembre 2010 - 02:29
Modifié par Seagloom, 29 septembre 2010 - 02:39 .
#9
Posté 29 septembre 2010 - 04:33
IIRC Aesgareth isn't necessarily "evil," but he definitely isn't good. I mean, if you lose the bet and give him the scepter, it gives it back to you so that you can escape. Of course, if YOU win the bet, he attacks you. So he's classy when he wins but he's an **** if he loses.
Can you pickpocket him? Or is killing him the only way to get the Deck of Many Things?
#10
Posté 29 septembre 2010 - 04:37
Humanoid_Taifun wrote...
Sure there is. Just bet on the way out when gambling the first or second time (as you will always lose the third time). If you win, he'll attack.
Maybe, but then I wouldn't be able to win the other items from him.
On the third bet (after relieving him of his two items), I don't think it's possible to win, as he always gets the Wheel, which is higher than any of the two possible draws you can get.
Anyway, I just refused to give him the scepter, and killed him.
Not the nicest thing to do, but I got the deck.
Hopefully it won't make any difference.
#11
Posté 29 septembre 2010 - 05:55
Thanks for the detailed information. But aren't the cambions (twin children of Belhifet) of Icewind Dale 2 half-devil?Seagloom wrote...
Iroumen has a point. According to the first Planescape Monstrous Compendium, one in ten cambions is chaotic neutral or chaotic good depending on its human mother's alignment. Similarly, 20% of Alu-Fiends are chaotic neutral or true neutral if their human fathers are non-evil. Aesgareth could actually be some shade of neutral. I doubt he is good given his violent retaliation after losing the "way out" bet though. On a side note, Cambions are half-demon in 2e. 3e did away with Cambions and Alu-Fiends in lieu of a generic half-fiend template that encompassed both fiend types.
Modifié par virumor, 29 septembre 2010 - 06:00 .
#12
Posté 30 septembre 2010 - 12:26
Icewind Dale II is under 3e rules so I guess that makes them generic half-fiends. Cambions are a strictly 2e thing, lore wise. If we were going by 2e terms they couldn't be cambions anyway simply because their mother was an elf. Cambions necessitate a human mother. The FR wiki claims they are Daemonfey but I disagree with that, as Daemonfey are extremely specific to a particular elven house. So yeah... the lazy answer is half-fiend.
Edit: I decided to dig up my copy of Guide to Hell to look this up. Apparently 2e half-devils are known as Devilkin. That is what Belhifet's children should technically be. Devilkin are the offspring of a male devil and mortal mother; which fits for Ilmadia. Unlike cambions there is no human restriction.
Modifié par Seagloom, 30 septembre 2010 - 12:41 .
#13
Posté 30 septembre 2010 - 11:27
Very conveniently, of course, certain creatures of the Lower Planes appear almost humanlike.
#14
Posté 30 septembre 2010 - 11:48
It is rarely consensual and death either at the moment of childbirth is not unheard of. Keep in mind these same fiends also sleep with succubi and such when inclined, and their proportions are human-like. Demogorgon sired offspring with Malcanthet according to 3e lore, and she is fairly typical of a succubus. A bit taller perhaps, but not Demogorgon's stature by any stretch of imagination. It could be intercourse is not as we imagine it to be with certain fiends. The books are unsurprisingly vague on specifics, but it does happen. Also as you write, many fiends are humanoid in appearance to begin with. This is almost universally true of unique fiends like Belhifet. Almost every time someone writes a one of a kind demon or devil, they resemble a human or elf.
Modifié par Seagloom, 30 septembre 2010 - 12:14 .
#15
Posté 30 septembre 2010 - 12:12
Dragons are a different matter - they are to a large part actual (or autonomous) mythology. They can be good, bad or transcending these things and often they have played a large part in the creation of the world.
#16
Posté 30 septembre 2010 - 12:22
Dragons are totally different. The game covers several dragon myths which is pretty cool. I'm a bigger fan of snake-like creatures in D&D than dragons, but I think the latter is often unfairly overlooked for being too prolific. Being able to draw a line from real world myth to the game is one the neatest things about it for me.
Modifié par Seagloom, 30 septembre 2010 - 12:23 .
#17
Posté 30 septembre 2010 - 12:51
But one can look at it the other way as well - Planetars & Solars are giant-like as well, and have produced offspring (like Kaelyn). And I don't suppose those beings would risk it if it would mean the demise of their mortal consort.
#18
Posté 30 septembre 2010 - 01:03
Modifié par Seagloom, 30 septembre 2010 - 01:05 .
#19
Posté 02 octobre 2010 - 12:57





Retour en haut






