Killjoy Cutter wrote...
Shandepared wrote...
Any thoughts on this wikipedia entry or did you just feel like sharing it with us?
Just putting some context into the discussion regarding treason and traitors.
Let's Put some more context, then.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betrayal
Betrayal (or backstabbing) is the breaking or violation of a presumptive social contract, trust, or confidence that produces moral and psychological conflict within a relationship amongst individuals, between organizations or between individuals and organizations. Often betrayal is the act of supporting a rival group, or it is a complete break from previously decided upon or presumed norms by one party from the others. Someone who betrays others is commonly called a traitor or betrayer. Betrayal is also a commonly used literary element and is often associated with or used as a plot twist.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason

Outside legal spheres, the word "traitor" may also be used to describe a person who betrays (or is accused of betraying) their own political party, nation, family, friends, ethnic group, team, religion, social class, or other group to which they may belong. Often, such accusations are controversial and disputed, as the person may not identify with the group of which they are a member, or may otherwise disagree with the group leaders making the charge. See, for example, race traitor.
Killjoy Cutter wrote...
EDIT: And given Pacifen's post on the next page from that one, I'll bow out after this.
My overall opinion: Anderson cannot commit treason against Cerberus, as they are not a government, and he is not a member. He cannot betray Cerberus, as he was never a member of Cerberus. Acting against Cerberus is not a betrayal of the Alliance, as the two are not one and the same.
Fine, run. Your overal opinion fails to even account for the meaning of this thread. Anderson betrayed the Alliance, not Cerberus, and not by acting against Cerberus, but by employing a foreign power to act on the internal affair of the Alliance without so much as consulting with any other Alliance official, inevitably divulging and exposing sensitive and classified information in the process. And his motivation was anything but prudent and responsible at the moment of making that decision.
Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 01 octobre 2010 - 01:56 .





Retour en haut




