My most humble of apologies to all for the delay. Its proved more difficult then I thought encorperating all the free text comments (which I'm determined to do) and I've been stupidly busy lately. Thankfully the end is now near and the results should be up by the latest this time tomorrow (but I'm hoping today)
Miranda Lawson - Under the Microscope
Débuté par
Major Truth
, sept. 30 2010 12:05
Retour en haut
#127
Posté 22 novembre 2010 - 03:55
Major Truth
-
- Members
- 412 messages
Captain Crash wrote...
awww guess I missed the chance to vote in this because apparently 200 people creates a consensus
Needless to say this poll is flawed so take any result with a grain of salt. Although I know its in good fun
I kept the poll open for as long as I could (nearly a month) but I had to close it in order to start compiling the results.
#128
Posté 22 novembre 2010 - 06:42
The Uncanny
-
- Members
- 25 753 messages
Major Truth wrote...
My most humble of apologies to all for the delay. Its proved more difficult then I thought encorperating all the free text comments (which I'm determined to do) and I've been stupidly busy lately. Thankfully the end is now near and the results should be up by the latest this time tomorrow (but I'm hoping today)
Thanks Major!
It will be very interesting to see the results.
#131
Posté 26 novembre 2010 - 02:33
Zulu_DFA
-
- Members
- 8 217 messages
In another thead. Use "microscope" for search.
#132
Posté 26 novembre 2010 - 06:51
snfonseka
-
- Members
- 2 469 messages
Zulu_DFA wrote...
In another thead. Use "microscope" for search.
Thanks.
#133
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 03:41
chessplayer209
-
- Members
- 231 messages
I voted in the survey, but there were some questions that I honestly thought were very poorly worded. For example, one question asks whether or not we thought Miranda was oversexualized. The possible responses were something along the lines of:
*Yes she was oversexualized. I didn't like it.
*No she was not oversexualized. I liked her.
*No she was not oversexualized. She was a confident sexual woman and there's nothing wrong with that.
*Yes and I want more of it"
...Or something like that...
Anyways, the thing that confused me was that one of the "Yes" responses said "yes and I want more of it" or something along those lines - indicating that the user thought she was somehow oversexualized, yet that user also wanted more of it? How can that even be possible? It doesn't make sense. "Oversexualized" implies that there was too much sexualization of the character, doesn't it? How could you possibly believe she was "oversexualized," but also want more of that?
Either she was "too sexualized" or she wasn't. (And I personally don't think there was anything wrong with her... I actually would like to see her continue to behave that way). But that aside, I decided to go with "No, she's a confident sexual woman" or whatever that one was.... simply because as I mentioned the "Yes and I want more" answer just didn't make any sense at all.
*Yes she was oversexualized. I didn't like it.
*No she was not oversexualized. I liked her.
*No she was not oversexualized. She was a confident sexual woman and there's nothing wrong with that.
*Yes and I want more of it"
...Or something like that...
Anyways, the thing that confused me was that one of the "Yes" responses said "yes and I want more of it" or something along those lines - indicating that the user thought she was somehow oversexualized, yet that user also wanted more of it? How can that even be possible? It doesn't make sense. "Oversexualized" implies that there was too much sexualization of the character, doesn't it? How could you possibly believe she was "oversexualized," but also want more of that?
Either she was "too sexualized" or she wasn't. (And I personally don't think there was anything wrong with her... I actually would like to see her continue to behave that way). But that aside, I decided to go with "No, she's a confident sexual woman" or whatever that one was.... simply because as I mentioned the "Yes and I want more" answer just didn't make any sense at all.
