Elite Midget wrote...
But wouldn't his actions still be politicial in that it's meant to push humanity up the food chain in the Universe? Didn't he say that when Cerberus benefits than so does humanity? Wouldn't it work the other way around as well?
Ahh, I see where you're coming from. I suppose strictly speaking you'd be right. However, Cerberus isn't gaining anything in either the Alliance political arena or in Council space's political arena. If what you're saying is true, wouldn't that be a sense of altruism?
I agree that TIM doesn't want aliens to ever be a threat to humanity, but he's shown great willingness to otherwise co-operate fully with other species, such as Liara, such as Aria, Mistress Treilana (*cough*), the 'specialist' late additions to the crew of SR-2 as well. Furthermore, I think he's quite wise enough to realise that we can't just 'shut out' the other species and that co-existence will go on for a very long time (well beyond his lifespan at least), so I think he would understand that humanity would lose far more than it would ever gain by becoming the sole leader (although he would be capitalizing on the event if Shephard made the decision for him in saving or damning the Council in ME1) or by otherwise adversely rocking the boat.Elite Midget wrote...
As for my thoughts on TIM... I get that he wants Humanity on top but the way Cerberus ignores Aliens, unless they can be used for his agenda, gives off the feeling that he doesn't want aliens to ever be a threat to humanity's dominance. Thus the only way this would work is if humanity is the sole leader and Aliens are only there to serve the human agenda.
I remember that in the codex it's mentioned I think under one of the Council races that they recognize that they'd lose far more than they'd gain if they turned on each other, I think that with humanity's introduction to that Council (and probably beforehand) TIM would also realise this. I say this because the game has generally tried to shown every character at least somewhat morally ambiguous (I think the one exception I can think of would be Nassana Dantius) and beliefs to be realistic (Samara on how the Justicar code isn't to bring spiritual enlightenment, but rather as to punish the wicked... she acknowledges to me at least that there are always differences of opinion and life can be hard, especially with her line of "If I must kill a man because I have seen him do wrong, do I really want to know that he's a devoted father?")





Retour en haut







