258 réponses à ce sujet

[ShrinkingFish]

TheMufflon wrote...

ShrinkingFish wrote...

And you aren't. You're too busy being right to be hostile.

Far, far right.

Puns are fun.

[Saibh]

Anarya wrote...

Upsettingshorts wrote...

TheMufflon wrote...

Wait, did you just admit to admit to having an ideology that resulted from misunderstanding and misapplying the theory of evolution and which only enjoyed a brief stint of populatity among 19th century slave owners? Seriously?

He did. And as someone who argues for sport I'm grinning ear to ear. 

svendigo wrote...
I guess you might have missed this little gem...[smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/wink.png[/smilie]

No, I noticed and I agree with you.  I was just being a dick.  Plus I love referencing 19th century naval terminology in modern usage, I get a kick out of it.

This thread is like watching a wolf fighting a bunny.

Of course, I immediately though of this when you said that.

For flavor.

[ShrinkingFish]

Ortaya Alevli wrote...

TonyTheBossDanza123 wrote...

Actually I was busy in another tab, then read the thread. I expected the hounds to pounce, but I am surprised it was so fast. When confronted with their inferiority, people get very, very, very defensive. The fact that so many are "laughing" only proves my point, and tells me I'm doing something right. 

I will say that of all the wolves you are the smartest, and you should be proud of that. Though, that's not necessarily good. The smartest idiot is still an idiot.

I don't feel like adding anything.

Just sit back and enjoy it like the rest of us. It's like going to the circus.

[Sylvius the Mad]

the_one_54321 wrote...

Complete rubbish. You either played with a lousy GM or you were a lousy player. Taking things in a different direction on the fly is standar procedure in table top. You have to be flexable because real worlds are flexable and change based on what direction you choose to take, no matter if they were initially planned directions or not.

Any player who ignores the direction of the game/party isn't likely to be invited back.

I wanna go to the tavern!

Are there any girls there?

If there are girls there I want to DO them!

[jackkel dragon]

And I didn't make my Sovereign "In before the lock" gif yet...

[jackkel dragon]

Sylvius the Mad wrote...

the_one_54321 wrote...

Complete rubbish. You either played with a lousy GM or you were a lousy player. Taking things in a different direction on the fly is standar procedure in table top. You have to be flexable because real worlds are flexable and change based on what direction you choose to take, no matter if they were initially planned directions or not.

Any player who ignores the direction of the game/party isn't likely to be invited back.

I wanna go to the tavern!

Are there any girls there?

If there are girls there I want to DO them!

I haven't actually played any tabletop games and I agree with you.

[TonyTheBossDanza123]

tool_bot wrote...

TonyTheBossDanza123 wrote...

You say reprehensible like it's a bad thing. A century ago interracial marriage would be reprehensible, and in Yemen children marrying adults isn't reprehensible.

This has nothing to do with anything.

Just because society scorns something, or someone, does not make it or him wrong

This is a truism and also has nothing to do with anything.

Indeed, I've found that if society scorns something then it warrants further investigation into it's merits, as again, society is average.

Sense this makes not.

They prove my point, that just because something is reprehensible doesn't mean it's bad.

[TheMufflon]

Sylvius the Mad wrote...

Any player who ignores the direction of the game/party isn't likely to be invited back.

Unless he takes it in a better direction.

[Chris Priestly]

Yeah this gets closed now as we have answered the question and it is now running off topic.


LOCKDOWN!