315 réponses à ce sujet

[Dhiro]

The ground in Witcher 2 is great and our ground sucks. Your point?

Edit: ground is different from floor, Dhiro. I guess.

Modifié par Dhiro, 01 octobre 2010 - 09:55 .

[StingingVelvet]

DarthCaine wrote...

Then again, look at The Witcher 2, it has a lot more features than DA2 and much better graphics ...

Indeed.

If the low-res textures are because of limited console VRAM I hope we have higher-res texture options on the PC.  Not sure about the consoles but Mass Effect on PC has lovely high-res textures, so Bioware has done it before.

[StingingVelvet]

Dhiro wrote...

The ground in Witcher 2 is great and our ground sucks. Your point?

I want it to look better.

[Dhiro]

StingingVelvet wrote...

Dhiro wrote...

The ground in Witcher 2 is great and our ground sucks. Your point?

I want it to look better.

Ah.

[Inside_Joke]

Dhiro wrote...

The ground in Witcher 2 is great and our ground sucks. Your point?

Edit: ground is different from floor, Dhiro. I guess.

Ha! 
I guess I'm not  the only one who doesn't look at the ground when they play a game?(or at least pay little attention to it)  If I did that in the good old days of Dino Crisis, I'd be Dino Chow x 10.

[The Masked Rog]

How about it's a Blightland and thus the ground is supposed to suck?

[rexil]

The Masked Rog wrote...

How about it's a Blightland and thus the ground is supposed to suck?

Oh yeah because ground textures loses resolution when it's got corrupted by the Blight. :>

Environment textures still looks poor. I hope they improve it and make it more detailed.

[SirShreK]

rexil wrote...

The Masked Rog wrote...

How about it's a Blightland and thus the ground is supposed to suck?

Oh yeah because ground textures loses resolution when it's got corrupted by the Blight. :>

Environment textures still looks poor. I hope they improve it and make it more detailed.

Its more like Willi Wonka's bubble-gum factory floor.

[zahra]

I'm going to play fortune-teller:

Spoilers!


Thread will be filled with posts about how graphics don't matter, how OP should play other games, how Bioware's strength is in the storyline etc. Smattering of posts that disagree with the majority. Someone tells OP to wait until the game comes out before bashing the game.Rubbish Hero comes in with something about LOTR. Console-bashing. Insults on intelligence. Someone posts a topless picture [unlikely, but this would be great, thanks]. Posts about how Baldurs Gate is awesome. Posts about how Baldurs gate is boring. Posts about Mass Effect 2 and how it was superior/vastly inferior to ME1. Priestly comes in with "Lockdown!" and Devil emoticon. Another thread about the same thing comes up again next week, or even in the next few hours etc because the threads are reincarnated over and over again because Priestly never lets them fulfill their karmic destinies and thus they never escape the thread-cycle.



 

Disclaimer: My fortune-telling is 100 percent bull****, but provides me with a great excuse to post this hypnotic picture of kittens.

[StingingVelvet]

slimgrin wrote...

2. This is an RPG, with boat loads more content than your typical action game. You can't compare a slick 5-10 hr game to a 30 -60 hr epic with interactive cut-scenes, thousands of lines of dialog, a reactive plot, etc.

Compare it to the Witcher 2 screen I posted then.

[StingingVelvet]

zahra wrote...

Thread will be filled with posts about how graphics don't matter, how OP should play other games, how Bioware's strength is in the storyline etc.

That would be typical, but again allow me to say I agree graphics aren't everything and I am excited for the game either way, I am just disappointed in the graphics.  The game I am playing the most right now is Arcanum and I am most active on the GOG.com boards, a site devoted to old games.  I am not a graphics ****, but I do think a good looking world contributes to immersion and story in a game and I do think 2011 games should look better than the screens I have seen so far.

[SirShreK]

StingingVelvet wrote...

slimgrin wrote...

2. This is an RPG, with boat loads more content than your typical action game. You can't compare a slick 5-10 hr game to a 30 -60 hr epic with interactive cut-scenes, thousands of lines of dialog, a reactive plot, etc.

Compare it to the Witcher 2 screen I posted then.

Slimgrin is openly a Witcher 2 fan as far as I remember.

[lv12medic]

I always thought, as a game is being built, they just throw in cheesy place holder textures to test mechanics and level design and such. It gets filled in later as the texture people actually spend time working on the final product textures.

[Syndose]

21121313 wrote...

Solid game play>purty lukin grafex.

This.

[AtreiyaN7]

The Witcher 2 ground is quite nice there. I wouldn't be averse to a painterly approach to the ground/distant landscapes in DA2 without having things being hyper-realistic, but I think they're probably going for a certain amount of realism and detail. Might not be enough for some people though. *shrug*

[DarthCaine]

slimgrin wrote...

I pray the epic that was TW1 won't be reduced to 20-30 hrs because of those graphics.

Early reports said TW2 will be about 30 hours long (it won't have fetch quests), but now I've heard they're trying to make it as long as the first

[Dave of Canada]

Good to see another thread sort of devolve into a Witcher debate.

[StingingVelvet]

Dave of Canada wrote...

Good to see another thread sort of devolve into a Witcher debate.

It's a pretty epic looking game

[StingingVelvet]

21121313 wrote...

Solid game play>purty lukin grafex.

I guess your position is we cannot have both?

[Dhiro]

Dave of Canada wrote...

Good to see another thread sort of digivolve into a Witcher debate.

Better.