Aller au contenu

Photo

All human council, huh?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
92 réponses à ce sujet

#51
Barquiel

Barquiel
  • Members
  • 5 854 messages

Schneidend wrote...

I really don't see the discrepancy. Humans are contributing a great deal to the technological innovation of the galactic market, and Alliance forces protect a great deal of Council-controlled space. They're being recognized for their achievements the same way the turians were and have been.


I just think that some years more between the First Contact war and ME1 would make the story more believable.
I know, I know...the story is written by humans...for humans ^_^
But the "HUMANS ARE AWESOME" thing is over the top in ME...imo. Other sci-fi universes are more believable in that aspect (Babylon 5 comes to my mind).

about the all-human council
We know...
- the alliance has 6 dreadnought and 200 ships in total (ME1)
- the turians had 37 dreadnoughts, the asari had 21, the salarians had 16
- if we use this 6/200 ratio...the turians have 1200, the asari 700 and the salarians 500 ships in total
- the turians suffered the heaviest losses: 20 cruisers!
I always save the DA, and Shep mentions that the alliance lost 8 cruisers (I suppose 3-4 ships if you don't save the DA)
But suddenly the alliance (200 ships!) is the only force in the galaxy that can secure the Citadel, council space and the alliance colonies?...and intimidate the other council races enough that they accept an all-human council?
These 700 asari ships (20 dreadnoughts)...What are they doing?

Modifié par Barquiel, 03 octobre 2010 - 12:41 .


#52
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 684 messages
Sadly, Mass Effect doesn't really maintain consistency with its own numbers most of the time. Ships is one thing, population figures are another.



Take, for example, ME2: we're told repeatedly that 'tens of thousands' of colonists are being abducted, yet in Horizon alone half a million are.

#53
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages
Humans are new and generally suck. Why would you want an all human council ?

#54
Asheer_Khan

Asheer_Khan
  • Members
  • 1 551 messages
I known that ME series is in general another lost case when comes to "non human centric SF universe" and honestly i much easier accepted Shepard role in ME 1 which was rather "side effect" of Eden prime events than deliberate placing her in role of the "Savior of the galaxy and advertising celebrity" in ME 2...

#55
Arijharn

Arijharn
  • Members
  • 2 850 messages

Asheer_Khan wrote...

I known that ME series is in general another lost case when comes to "non human centric SF universe" and honestly i much easier accepted Shepard role in ME 1 which was rather "side effect" of Eden prime events than deliberate placing her in role of the "Savior of the galaxy and advertising celebrity" in ME 2...


I agree... wow, I agree with Asheer! XD

Incidentally, I can't be alone in thinking an all human council just seems like a really bad idea. I dread to see what the PS3 players will be like if they can't modify their ME1 history because as is I just can't get into a ME2 default character because of this. ME2 default is like one long litany of bad decisions imo.

#56
mosor

mosor
  • Members
  • 1 372 messages

Barquiel wrote...

I just think that some years more between the First Contact war and ME1 would make the story more believable.
I know, I know...the story is written by humans...for humans ^_^
But the "HUMANS ARE AWESOME" thing is over the top in ME...imo. Other sci-fi universes are more believable in that aspect (Babylon 5 comes to my mind).


Why is it more believable that humans suck in Sci-Fi? If there are aliens out there, for all we know they're weaker and far more stupid than we are. If you ask me, it's a refreshing change from aliens being superior in every way Sci-fi!

about the all-human council
We know...
- the alliance has 6 dreadnought and 200 ships in total (ME1)
- the turians had 37 dreadnoughts, the asari had 21, the salarians had 16
- if we use this 6/200 ratio...the turians have 1200, the asari 700 and the salarians 500 ships in total
- the turians suffered the heaviest losses: 20 cruisers!
I always save the DA, and Shep mentions that the alliance lost 8 cruisers (I suppose 3-4 ships if you don't save the DA)
But suddenly the alliance (200 ships!) is the only force in the galaxy that can secure the Citadel, council space and the alliance colonies?...and intimidate the other council races enough that they accept an all-human council?
These 700 asari ships (20 dreadnoughts)...What are they doing?


Your argument hinges on the fact that they use a 6/200 ratio. We don't know that to be true. For all we know Turian military strategy is about the "Go big or go home" strategy where they focus on dreadnoughts but build proportionally far less versions other ship designs. From the codex, turian military strategy isn't about about fast, manuvravble strikes humanity likes to do. For that strategy, cruisers are your better option and you'd focus on those kinds of ships.

What we do know is that the battle of the citadel crippled the council races enough for humanity to step into the power vacuum.

Modifié par mosor, 03 octobre 2010 - 01:45 .


#57
Barquiel

Barquiel
  • Members
  • 5 854 messages

mosor wrote...

Why is it more believable that humans suck in Sci-Fi? If there are aliens out there, for all we know they're weaker and far more stupid than we are. If you ask me, it's a refreshing change from aliens being superior in every way Sci-fi!


I think there not many sci-fi universes where humans suck:D

But let us assume that we meet some aliens (I would prefer blue space babes!) who mastered space travel 2000 years ago. I find it hard to believe that we school them in a first contact war and overthrow their government after only 30 years.

The 200/6 ratio is pure speculation, of course. But the whole scenario would be more believable if the council races would have suffered heavy losses during the geth attack...and not 20 cruisers and an asari dreadnought (I suppose the salarians lost some ships, too).

Modifié par Barquiel, 03 octobre 2010 - 03:28 .


#58
jbblue05

jbblue05
  • Members
  • 1 480 messages

Shandepared wrote...


The Council could levy sanctions against the Alliance but it won't because the humans own it. In regards to fleet numbers, humanity is about on par with the salarians. We have those eight dreadnoughts, plus several under construction, plus several fighter carriers which are not limited by the treaty, with more under construction, naturally. Humanity also has their stealth frigates which completely change the nature of warfare. If anyone attacked humanity the Systems Alliance could counter-attack deep in the aggressors territory without fear of retaliation. The mere threat of that alone should be enough to make any potential enemies think twice.

Most of the Citadel is owned by the Salarians, Turians, and Asari.  The Alliance is stretched thin trying to protect the Citadel they are no match for the combined efforts of the Citadel races.  The mere threat of all the Citadel races against the Alliance will make the Alliance think twice.  The Alliance can't even properly protect their own colonies before most of the damage is done.

This is all just within the two-years since Mass Effect. In another two years the Alliance will be even stronger. The Alliance economy is already competitive even if it is not the largest and it has much room to grow. The Citadel itself is, as I said, an asset. It is a fortress and humanity having control of it greatly enhances their leverage. The former Council races can not kick humanity off without fighting a major war and none of them wants that becaus if they win it will be destructive. The Citadel is owned by whomever runs it and if this scenario humanity, and thus the Systems Alliance, are its owners.

The Alliance economy is no match  for the Citadel races. The Citadel races have been around for 1,000+ years their is no way the Alliance can match or come close to them in just 28 years.
The Geth and Sovereign overwhelmed the Citadel Fleets and I doubt the Alliance alone can match the Council fleets.
The Council Races can easily overwhelm the Alliance with numbers and the Alliance isn't stpid their are just some battles you can't win. 

Then why haven't they? I think you overestimate the former Council race's willingness to go to war. Keep in mind these people have not fought a real war in over a thousand years. They don't have much of a warrior culture anymore except for the turians and the turians cannot defeat humanity alone, at least not efficiently (if at all). The fact that the Systems Alliance is able to attack batarian worlds freely without retaliation should tell you just how insignificant they are. At most they are a nuisance, but they lost their teeth with the fall of Torfan. The reason they resorted to piracy was because they were weak and now that they're even weaker all they have to rely on are small groups of terrorists.

I think you are overestimating the Alliance. The COuncil races did fight in a real war against SOvereign, Rachni, and Krogan Rebellions.  THe Alliance showed up at the last second to defeat Sovereign. Shanxi was a small skirmish.  Only 3% of Humanity join the Alliance I wouldn't call that a warrior culture. The Turians don't have to fight the Alliance alone they have the respect of all the Citadel races. THe Batarians were weak they relied on the Council too much for protection.

Once again, no what charges would the former Council races attack humanity? Humanity has not attacked them, humanity is not oppressing them. Humanity came to their aid at the Battle of the Citadel and when the Citadel Fleets were decimated by the geth humanity assumed responsibility for their duties. Humanity can rightly claim that they had no choice but to take power in the immediate wake of the geth attack and that now the hostility of the former Council races has deterred humanity from inviting them back in. If they play their cards right the Systems Alliance/Human Council can pit the former Council races against one another. The asari have already withdrawn leaving only the turians and salarians.

Judging by ME2 the aliens aren't too happy with an all-human/human-led Council their are riots and the other races are undermining the Alliance.  The Alliance should take a lead role after the Council is killed but claiming complete control is not the best way since the Alliance wasn't their for the bulk of the battle like the Council races were.  The Alliance would seem like oppurtunists rather then saviors if they try to take complete control.
The Alliance can't pit the former Council races against each other since the Council races would prefer the Traditional Council and because of Anderson's action in Retribution the Council Races have more ammunition against the Alliance
The Asari haven't withdrawn they are plotting with the Turians

The asari have withdrawn, lending only political support to the turians. Is this hostile? Yes, but it's not an act of war. The turians are trying to intimidate the Systems Alliance but they're still at a disadvantage. The sleeping giant has awoken and the old guard are desperately trying to convince it not to rise. Humanity suffered fewer losses them, which put them ahead, and humanity can keep expanding. The turians are at this point playing catch-up.

Another thing to keep in mind is Alliance military doctrine. Our fleet is far more flexible than the turians' fleet. The turians have such a large military because theirs is designed to be mostly immoble. It hunkers down on every colony and acts as a tough garrison. If the asari have seceded their defense responsibilities to the turians then it is quite possible that the turians now need to defend asari space as well as their own. The turian fleet will need to be truly massive to defend their own colonies and asari colonies at the same time and have any serious capability to threaten the Alliance. That's something people forget: the turian military needs to be twice again as big as humanity's in order to attack it. Our military is mobile and fluid... it can defend and attack all at once.

The Alliance is the one trying to play catch up they don't have the economy to match the Council races military production.

The Asari have ceded the share of Citadel fleet requirements that doesn't mean they have stopped building warships.
Why would the Turians defend Asari space when the only fleet the Asari lost was at the Citadel?  The Asari still have their ships patrolling Asari space.
If the Alliance all attacked at once that would lead their colonies ripe for a suprise attack..
The U.S. has the most powerful military in the world but its highly unlikely they can take over the world with no powerful allies.
When Germany's allies left them the ****s were periodically crushed.

Yet another advantage for the Alliance is Cerberus, naturally. Through Shepard and his contacts they've gained access to state of the art turian weaponry and asari armoring for their ships. If Cerberus passes this along to humanity our fleet will be even stronger. That's not even getting into what advantages the Collector base can offer, or Cerberus' other projects like Overlord or Trapdoor.

My main point is after ME1 the all-human council is silly but in the aftermath of ME3 the Alliance has much more to gain.
With all the advantages the Alliance would recieve from the Reaper invasion Shepard and Cerberus experiments they would have enough to PUT FEAR in the other races.
The Reapers usually atack the Citadel first if the Alliance is controlling the Citadel their fleet and the all-human council would be wiped out 

Finally, when the Alliance 5th fleet passed by Patavig, a volus colony (and thus part of the turian hierarchy) volus separatists began protesting. It would seem that the volus are starting to think that they'd be better off parting ways with the turians and instead going out on their own, most definitely with the intention of forming a close union with the Systems Alliance. If this happens the turian economy will go to ****.


Patavig is only true if its a human-led council and one Volus colony doesn't represent the majority of the Volus. Judging by Retribution the Volus and Turians are still tight-knit

Once the Alliance has won over one ally they will have an easier time winning over others like the elcor or hanar.  As the balance tips the salarians will be more tempted to take humanity's side. The codex states the salarians are our natural allies in comparison to the conservative asari. It is hinted in ME1 that the salarians were the ones largely pushing for a human seat on the Council. They're ready to ditch their own partners in favor of a superior alliance.


Unless the Alliance can win over  the Asari, Salarian, or turians they don't have a powerfull ally. 
The former Council races won't submit to all-human rule they are more likely to branch off and form their own Citadel.
The Volus, Hanar, and Elcor trust the former Council races more and will most likely follow them. A multi-racial Council would offer fairer representation.
If the Citadel races leave the Alliance would just be protecting a space station full of humans which would be no better then another Human Colony

#59
mosor

mosor
  • Members
  • 1 372 messages

Barquiel wrote...

mosor wrote...

Why is it more believable that humans suck in Sci-Fi? If there are aliens out there, for all we know they're weaker and far more stupid than we are. If you ask me, it's a refreshing change from aliens being superior in every way Sci-fi!


I think there not many sci-fi universes where humans suck:D

But let us assume that we meet some aliens (I would prefer blue space babes!) who mastered space travel 2000 years ago. I find it hard to believe that we school them in a first contact war and overthrow their government after only 30 years.

The 200/6 ratio is pure speculation, of course. But the whole scenario would be more believable if the council races suffered heavy losses during the geth attack...and not 20 cruisers and an asari dreadnought (I suppose the salarians lost some ships, too).


Some civilizations just grow stagnant. They reach a certain level of develiopment, grow complacent or had some setback to check their expansion ( Maybe the Rachni Wars, and Krogan Rebellions did that to the council civilization). The dialogue from that bartender matriarch kinda hints at complacency with the asari. At least the asari didn't neglect the finer things in life, like entertainment and pleasure! :lol:

I have to  agree with ya, the whole 30 year bit is a little much for me to swallow too...as much as I want to believe it, being the champion of humanity that I am :P

There is defintiely a contraction. Do I believe the turian fleet is just dreadnought heavy and that 20 ships lost at the citadel alone would represent a crippling loss or do I believe that loss was just a flesh wound and that they just gave the citadel to humanity because they have better things to do with their ships?

Modifié par mosor, 03 octobre 2010 - 03:36 .


#60
Guest_Shandepared_*

Guest_Shandepared_*
  • Guests

jbblue05 wrote...

Most of the Citadel is owned by the Salarians, Turians, and Asari.


Populated, not owned. Big difference. Finally, if they are such a threat to the Alliance and could make them think twice then WHY HAVEN'T THEY????.

jbblue05 wrote...

The COuncil races did fight in a real war against SOvereign, Rachni, and Krogan Rebellions.


Sovereign was one battle and the Rachni Wars and Krogan Rebellions were OVER A THOSUAND YEARS AGO.

If the Council races are so much stronger why haven't they curb-stomped humanity? Why did they fear humanity in the first place? Even twenty years ago they were afraid of the Systems Alliance.


jbblue05 wrote...

Judging by ME2 the aliens aren't too happy with an all-human/human-led Council their are riots and the other races are undermining the Alliance.


Riots won't change anything. They're rioting and protesting specifically because complaining is about all they're capable of doing. If they were so powerful they'd just legislate the Systems Alliance out of power. 



jbblue05 wrote...

The Alliance is the one trying to play catch up they don't have the economy to match the Council races military production.


Sleeping giant.

Anyway, I'm gonna stop now since it is clear from your rebuttal that you're not actually reading anything I type. Or at least you aren't comprehending it.

#61
DarkSeraphym

DarkSeraphym
  • Members
  • 825 messages
I think I'll jump in to attempt to make some of your points a little more clear Shandepared.

For one thing, as Shandepared mentioned, the Council races haven't fought a war in over a thousand years. Want an example of how can an anti-war attitude can help create problems with militaristic power? Look no further than Vietnam. Many historians will tell you that the anti-war ideas of the populace had a helping hand with determining the United States' role in that war. The Council races know that a fight with the Systems Alliance is going to be a bloody, very costly one and lack any real want to go to war short of the Turians, who are merely beefing up their defense if you have a human-led council but do not mistake beefing up military might as any true indication of a want to go to war. Do you honestly expect the Turians to show up in their dreadnaughts and open fire on the Citadel if humanity refuses to step down? The only thing would accomplish is killing a lot of organic beings and a great deal of destruction to the very thing they want.

Now, onto the political/economic significance of the Citadel itself. Essentially, we are describing a location that has a great deal of "clout" so to speak within the galaxy. why would Udina have even mentioned humanity keeping control of it and the Council as a whole in the first place if this were not true? If humanity maintains control of the Citadel on top of the Council, exactly how do you expect the other races to attempt to sanction humanity? With what authority? If the other races are still maintaining a presence on the Citadel, one can infer that the other races as a whole have accepted humanity's leadership of the Council, at least for now anyways. At this point in time for a human-led Council, humanity maintains far more political power than the other races could possibly have on humanity.

As for economics, think of how many people actually live on the Citadel and think of all of the different races that the Citadel maintains as habitants. You can argue that the other races are economically more powerful than humanity, but humanity maintains the Citadel as leverage. For all intents and purpose, Mass Effect seems to infer that the Citadel is the trading center of the galaxy, at least within Council space. This is a matter of who controls the purse. You can be as rich as you like, but if I control the location that you do most of your business then I am going to have a certain amount of leverage over you. It doesn't matter how full the purse is, all that matters is who controls it.

Now, the problem with alliances with the former races is that is visibly shown in the human-led version of ME2 that the "alliances" between the three races is not nearly as tight-knit as we have been previously led to believe. The asari have seceded their share of defense to the Turians, more or less removing themselves as possible military allies to the Turians should the Turians be interested in standing up to humanity. As for the salarians, this is more debatable since not much has been said about the Turians and the Salarians. Personally, I agree with Shandepard that the Salarians feel more opportunistic and are more likely to go with whoever is going to be with the more powerful ally at the time, but there isn't a whole lot of in-game data to support this so I won't touch this alliance. At most, we know that the Asaris have more or less given up a large protion of their ability to be of much use to the Turians in terms of military might. If you would like jbblue, please elaborate on how the Asari are "plotting" with the Turians by simply giving up their share of defense.

As for alliances with the non-former races, why would the non-former races care who is leading the Council? If you are not being represented in a government, does it really make a difference who is ruling you? Insurrections or rebellions happen when people feel oppressed and almost always by those who wish to take power for themselves. I think it is misguided jbblue to assume that the Volus, Hanar, or Elcor really care who is ruling their government if neither side is going to represent them regardless. If the Volus have a problem with humanity's governance, they'll stand up for themselves and fight for their own power, not for the power of other races. Likewise, why would the former Council races form their own Citadel? It is mentioned in the game just how pivotal the Citadel's location is to its economic/political might. This is why the Terminus Systems lack the economic/militaristic power that the Council has, because they chose to exist beyond the Council. The only fear that the Council has of them is the fear that they might band together, which would result in more costs than it is worth to go to war with them.

Essentially, what it comes down to is that control of the Citadel and, thus the Council as a whole, has put humanity in a position of political and economic power that, up to this point, the other races have not been willing to contest en masse. Why? Well, for one thing they don't want to enter a costly war.  For another, control of the Citadel itself leaves the other races without a whole lot of options unless they intend to use a coup against humanity in terms of an internal threat. Unless the Turians intend to attack blockade or attack Earth, which would prove rather uneventful as Shandepard has mentioned because of the implications involved with being the "aggressor", the Turians certainly aren't going to resort to bombarding a space station filled to the brim with not only humans, but their own and members of other races.

What I think is very likely to have happened in constructing the human-led Council is precisely how Udina described it. The former races had no idea what hit them and had no idea how to respond to it. Suddenly, humanity steps up and takes a role of leadership, a beacon of light in the darkness of confusion for the former races so to speak. At first, the former races responded well to the notion but within the two years between ME1 and ME2 started to realize that humanity wasn't going to step down from the rule of leadership that it had already assumed. Power vaccums are notorious throughout human history for creating a chain of events similar to this one. By the time the races realized what was going on, it was too late. Now the aliens are more or less stuck in a predicament where humanity has likely made itself more powerful in the last two years, possibly even by conscripting new war ships from the other races for the use of the Citadel fleet, and once again the former races are like a deer caught in headlights, clueless as to how to respond.

Modifié par DarkSeraphym, 04 octobre 2010 - 10:19 .


#62
DarkSeraphym

DarkSeraphym
  • Members
  • 825 messages

mosor wrote...

Barquiel wrote...

mosor wrote...

Why is it more believable that humans suck in Sci-Fi? If there are aliens out there, for all we know they're weaker and far more stupid than we are. If you ask me, it's a refreshing change from aliens being superior in every way Sci-fi!


I think there not many sci-fi universes where humans suck:D

But let us assume that we meet some aliens (I would prefer blue space babes!) who mastered space travel 2000 years ago. I find it hard to believe that we school them in a first contact war and overthrow their government after only 30 years.

The 200/6 ratio is pure speculation, of course. But the whole scenario would be more believable if the council races suffered heavy losses during the geth attack...and not 20 cruisers and an asari dreadnought (I suppose the salarians lost some ships, too).


Some civilizations just grow stagnant. They reach a certain level of develiopment, grow complacent or had some setback to check their expansion ( Maybe the Rachni Wars, and Krogan Rebellions did that to the council civilization). The dialogue from that bartender matriarch kinda hints at complacency with the asari. At least the asari didn't neglect the finer things in life, like entertainment and pleasure! :lol:

I have to  agree with ya, the whole 30 year bit is a little much for me to swallow too...as much as I want to believe it, being the champion of humanity that I am :P

There is defintiely a contraction. Do I believe the turian fleet is just dreadnought heavy and that 20 ships lost at the citadel alone would represent a crippling loss or do I believe that loss was just a flesh wound and that they just gave the citadel to humanity because they have better things to do with their ships?


I apologize for the double post, but I thought I'd respond to your points as well mosor since I totally missed them.

Really, I think it is neither one. What is far more likely, as I mentioned above, is a problem similar to "shell shock" with respect to politics instead of combat. The other races had no idea what to do in this sort of crisis and turned to what seemed like a decent option at the time, kind of similar to how post-WW1 Germany had no idea how to handle its economic problems and turned to someone who stood up and said he could offer solutions, a man known as Adolph Hitler.

The reason that the races haven't put up any resistance short of internal threats is, what I believe anyway, due to a similar problem. They have never faced losing total political control of something that, once again in my opinion, they started to rely a little too much upon and are trying to slowly figure out how to get back; which in the case of Turians appears to be through intimidation by slowly building up its forces. However, as Shandepard mentioned, the aliens do not realize just how much of a "sleeping giant" humanity can ultimately become if they delay their attempts to regain control for too long, which thanks to details from Lair of the Shadow Broker I think the other races have managed to do. As the former races continue to become stronger, so does humanity and humanity has the advantage of the Citadel that the former races no longer have. Likewise if you are a true ReneShep, Operation Overlord, TRAPDOOR, and the research that will come from the Collector Base are going to make resistance even more challenging.

Ultimately, I think the root of humanity's power is just absolute shock with respect to the other species. A catastrophic event occured that caused confusion, anger, and despair all at once and that triggered a chain of events that allowed humanity to gain power of the Citadel and, ultimately, these chains of events are creating a similar effect on the former races that is leaving them stranded for answers on how to regain control.

Modifié par DarkSeraphym, 04 octobre 2010 - 11:11 .


#63
Guest_Shandepared_*

Guest_Shandepared_*
  • Guests
Well said, DarkSeraphym. I ought to submit my posts to you first. I'll hire you as an editor.

#64
DarkSeraphym

DarkSeraphym
  • Members
  • 825 messages

Shandepared wrote...

Well said, DarkSeraphym. I ought to submit my posts to you first. I'll hire you as an editor.


Thanks I suppose. It is always nice to get a compliment.

Anyways, to clarify a point I was hoping to make but I don't think I did, I don't see humanity's rise to power in the Renegade ending to Mass Effect 1 as much as 30 years of merit as much as I see it as 30 years of sheer dumb luck and fortune events on the behalf of humanity that could easily go as follows:

1. It is fortunate that the System Alliance military is comprised mostly of cruisers and frigates that fit with the more "hit-and-run" strategy behind the human military.  Since these ships are not necessarily huge, this means that a particularly large amount of ships can likely be built within a relatively short amount of time.

2. The First Contact War is in itself a symbol of luck for humans. The Shanxi incident only resulted in a human victory because the Turians mistakingly believed they had wiped out the human forces and then got caught off guard by the Second Fleet. This stroke of luck ultimately made the Council interested in humanity's military capabilities.

3. It is fortunate that Sovereign and the Geth Armada were able to wipe out so many of the Citadel fleets that had been left to defend it in the Battle of the Citadel after the rest of the fleet went out to patrol the Mass Relays for Saren. This painted humanity in a rather positive light when it comes in and saves the day, which fullfills the contribution requirement necessary for a race to gain admission into the Council (Paragon).

4. It is fortunate that Sovereign and the Geth Armada wiped out the Destiny Ascension, this created a political vacuum that humanity wouldn't have been able to take advantage of otherwise.

5. It is fortunate that the Geth attacked the Citadel with Sovereign, otherwise the Council (either melting pot version or human-led) would not have been able to blame Sovereign as a Geth ship. A common enemy is going to help keep humanity in power much longer than they might otherwise have been able to, which would quell the anger at humanity joining the Council after only 30 years or quell the anger at humanity taking over the Council altogether.

Really, I think we are looking at 30 years of opportunities not extended to the other aliens; not 30 years of merit.

#65
thq95

thq95
  • Members
  • 151 messages
The alien council commited genocide twice, why does everybody think they are so good? All human council ftw.

#66
jbblue05

jbblue05
  • Members
  • 1 480 messages

Shandepared wrote...

Populated, not owned. Big difference. Finally, if they are such a threat to the Alliance and could make them think twice then WHY HAVEN'T THEY????.

Most of the CItadel is populated by the Council Races but nothing is owned by them? There are many parts of the Citadel we haven't seen yet that are Asari, Turian, and Salarian exclusive. Its only been 2 years they're not going to immideately start a war.  They're still rebuilding plus Bioware wrote it that way

If the Council races are so much stronger why haven't they curb-stomped humanity? Why did they fear humanity in the first place? Even twenty years ago they were afraid of the Systems Alliance.

The Turians would've curb-stomped humanity in Shanxi if the Council didn't intervene.  Thye feared Humanity was going down the same path of the Krogans it was pretty obvious.  Where's the evidence they were scared 20 years ago.  The Alliance was seen as a useful ally because of their military's ability to take back Shanxi.


Riots won't change anything. They're rioting and protesting specifically because complaining is about all they're capable of doing. If they were so powerful they'd just legislate the Systems Alliance out of power. 

Riots are usually just the beginning of something greater.  Their using the Systems Alliance to protect the Citadel while they rebuild


Sleeping giant.

Anyway, I'm gonna stop now since it is clear from your rebuttal that you're not actually reading anything I type. Or at least you aren't comprehending it.


vice-versa

#67
Barquiel

Barquiel
  • Members
  • 5 854 messages

DarkSeraphym wrote...

Really, I think it is neither one. What is far more likely, as I mentioned above, is a problem similar to "shell shock" with respect to politics instead of combat. The other races had no idea what to do in this sort of crisis and turned to what seemed like a decent option at the time, kind of similar to how post-WW1 Germany had no idea how to handle its economic problems and turned to someone who stood up and said he could offer solutions, a man known as Adolph Hitler.



That's my problem...the situations are nothing alike.

Germany fought for 4 years...and lost.
- they lost millions of soldiers
- Germany's allies (Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Empire) have collapsed.
- food-shortage in german cities
- revolution
So, when the allies presented the Treaty of Versailles, there was nothing the german diplomats could do about it (Ludendorff/Hindenburg made this clear to the politicians).

On the other hand, the council races lost one battle! Their colonies and fleets are (more or less) intact. Their political system is stable.

Udina presents his plans of an all-human council.
1) Why does anyone take this council seriously?
Let's us assume that the turians break some council law. What can an all-human council do?
- military intervention?
no...the turians have the largest fleet in citadel space
- economic sanctions?
Who cares? The alliance economy is tiny. They would be futile if the asari/salarians don't agree.
2) Why doesn't the turian government (asari/salarians) send a new annoying councilor?
escort: 30 dreadnoughts
Who wants to stop them? Hackett's fifth fleet? C-Sec?

#68
jbblue05

jbblue05
  • Members
  • 1 480 messages

DarkSeraphym wrote...

I think I'll jump in to attempt to make some of your points a little more clear Shandepared.

For one thing, as Shandepared mentioned, the Council races haven't fought a war in over a thousand years. Want an example of how can an anti-war attitude can help create problems with militaristic power? Look no further than Vietnam. Many historians will tell you that the anti-war ideas of the populace had a helping hand with determining the United States' role in that war. The Council races know that a fight with the Systems Alliance is going to be a bloody, very costly one and lack any real want to go to war short of the Turians, who are merely beefing up their defense if you have a human-led council but do not mistake beefing up military might as any true indication of a want to go to war. Do you honestly expect the Turians to show up in their dreadnaughts and open fire on the Citadel if humanity refuses to step down? The only thing would accomplish is killing a lot of organic beings and a great deal of destruction to the very thing they want.

You forget the part of the Council Races sending fleets to the Citadel to overwhelm the Alliance.  They don't have to fire a shot and ask the Alliance to step down from the Council.  The Alliance isn't stupid they know they have no chance against the most powerful races in the Galaxy and would step down.  THe Alliance is already overwhelmed by their responsibility.  Why do you think the Alliance is begging the Asari, Salarian, and turians to help them protect the Citadel.

Now, onto the political/economic significance of the Citadel itself. Essentially, we are describing a location that has a great deal of "clout" so to speak within the galaxy. why would Udina have even mentioned humanity keeping control of it and the Council as a whole in the first place if this were not true? If humanity maintains control of the Citadel on top of the Council, exactly how do you expect the other races to attempt to sanction humanity? With what authority? If the other races are still maintaining a presence on the Citadel, one can infer that the other races as a whole have accepted humanity's leadership of the Council, at least for now anyways. At this point in time for a human-led Council, humanity maintains far more political power than the other races could possibly have on humanity.

The races are counting on the Alliance to protect the Citadel while they rebuild their fleets.  The Alliance's major trading partners are the Council races if the Council Races refuse to trade with the Alliance the Alliance's economy would crumble.  What would the Alliance do next send fleets to the Asari. Turian, and Salarian homeworlds forcing them to trade with them.  The Alliance isn't stupid their fleets would be shot down before they get anywhere close to the homeworlds.

As for economics, think of how many people actually live on the Citadel and think of all of the different races that the Citadel maintains as habitants. You can argue that the other races are economically more powerful than humanity, but humanity maintains the Citadel as leverage. For all intents and purpose, Mass Effect seems to infer that the Citadel is the trading center of the galaxy, at least within Council space. This is a matter of who controls the purse. You can be as rich as you like, but if I control the location that you do most of your business then I am going to have a certain amount of leverage over you. It doesn't matter how full the purse is, all that matters is who controls it.

This trading center has ties to the Salarian, Turian, and Asari governments.  The Alliance can't strong-arm the trading center without strong-arming the governments whom they represent.  Some merchants can be independent but its likely that most are Government funded. I'm sure their are some stores ranned by the Council.

Now, the problem with alliances with the former races is that is visibly shown in the human-led version of ME2 that the "alliances" between the three races is not nearly as tight-knit as we have been previously led to believe. The asari have seceded their share of defense to the Turians, more or less removing themselves as possible military allies to the Turians should the Turians be interested in standing up to humanity. As for the salarians, this is more debatable since not much has been said about the Turians and the Salarians. Personally, I agree with Shandepard that the Salarians feel more opportunistic and are more likely to go with whoever is going to be with the more powerful ally at the time, but there isn't a whole lot of in-game data to support this so I won't touch this alliance. At most, we know that the Asaris have more or less given up a large protion of their ability to be of much use to the Turians in terms of military might. If you would like jbblue, please elaborate on how the Asari are "plotting" with the Turians by simply giving up their share of defense.

The Destiny Ascension the Asari are pissed off the Alliance didn't save it.  The Turians aren't honoring the treaty of Farixen their building dreadnoughts and warships at an alarming rate.  The Asari ceding their shares of defences to the Turians is an act of rebelling under Alliance rule.   Connect the Dots you can see they're plotting together.
The Salarians would rather have a Council seat then be a pawn for the Alliance. The Salarians have allied with the other Council races for more then a 1,000 years why would they ally with the Alliance and oppose the other Council races after one battle. The Salarians are smart they know the COuncil races united are far more powerful then the Alliance by itself.

As for alliances with the non-former races, why would the non-former races care who is leading the Council? If you are not being represented in a government, does it really make a difference who is ruling you? Insurrections or rebellions happen when people feel oppressed and almost always by those who wish to take power for themselves. I think it is misguided jbblue to assume that the Volus, Hanar, or Elcor really care who is ruling their government if neither side is going to represent them regardless. If the Volus have a problem with humanity's governance, they'll stand up for themselves and fight for their own power, not for the power of other races. Likewise, why would the former Council races form their own Citadel? It is mentioned in the game just how pivotal the Citadel's location is to its economic/political might. This is why the Terminus Systems lack the economic/militaristic power that the Council has, because they chose to exist beyond the Council. The only fear that the Council has of them is the fear that they might band together, which would result in more costs than it is worth to go to war with them.

The volus are a client race for the turians,  the Elcor owe space-fligt to the Asari, The Citadel and COuncil races have been building Alliances with each other while Humanity was in the stone age.  The Volus, Elcor, and Hanar have prospered for a 1,000 years under Council rule.
They don't have to build a Citadel they could form a "capitol" to oppose the Alliance's influence.  No matter how powerful you think the Alliance is they can't protect the Citadel and their Colonies without support from the other races and enemies on all sides.  The Alliance would have to choose to protect the Citadel or their Colonies either way the Alliance would be crippled..

 
Essentially, what it comes down to is that control of the Citadel and, thus the Council as a whole, has put humanity in a position of political and economic power that, up to this point, the other races have not been willing to contest en masse. Why? Well, for one thing they don't want to enter a costly war.  For another, control of the Citadel itself leaves the other races without a whole lot of options unless they intend to use a coup against humanity in terms of an internal threat. Unless the Turians intend to attack blockade or attack Earth, which would prove rather uneventful as Shandepard has mentioned because of the implications involved with being the "aggressor", the Turians certainly aren't going to resort to bombarding a space station filled to the brim with not only humans, but their own and members of other races.


The Alliance only keeps power if the other races are willing or if the Alliance can find a powerful ally. Again 2 years is not enough time to overthrow the Alliance.  Why are you saying only the Turians, yes they have the military might, don't forget STG, Asari Commandos,  And the funding and military aid the Turians would get from the other races.
.

What I think is very likely to have happened in constructing the human-led Council is precisely how Udina described it. The former races had no idea what hit them and had no idea how to respond to it. Suddenly, humanity steps up and takes a role of leadership, a beacon of light in the darkness of confusion for the former races so to speak. At first, the former races responded well to the notion but within the two years between ME1 and ME2 started to realize that humanity wasn't going to step down from the rule of leadership that it had already assumed. Power vaccums are notorious throughout human history for creating a chain of events similar to this one. By the time the races realized what was going on, it was too late. Now the aliens are more or less stuck in a predicament where humanity has likely made itself more powerful in the last two years, possibly even by conscripting new war ships from the other races for the use of the Citadel fleet, and once again the former races are like a deer caught in headlights, clueless as to how to respond.


The Alliance remains cluesless to the Reaper threat.  The Alliance isn't doing itself any favors by saying the Reapers don't exist.  The Alliance would get more support if they capitalized on the Reaper threat.by saying its real.  So you're telling me after 30 years the Alliance is far more powerful then all the races combined that have been around for 1,000+ years.  The aliens aren't stuck with the Alliance after 2 years the Aliens are already undermining the Alliance.  The only leverage the Alliance has is more ships to protect the Citadel and they are begging for the other races help.  The Alliance can't carry the weight of the Galaxy on their shoulders without the support of the other races.
Their is no doubt the Alliance has become more powerful in the last 2 years but it can't match the power of the Council races yet..
 

#69
DarkSeraphym

DarkSeraphym
  • Members
  • 825 messages

jbblue05 wrote...
You forget the part of the Council Races sending fleets to the Citadel to overwhelm the Alliance.  They don't have to fire a shot and ask the Alliance to step down from the Council.  The Alliance isn't stupid they know they have no chance against the most powerful races in the Galaxy and would step down.  THe Alliance is already overwhelmed by their responsibility.  Why do you think the Alliance is begging the Asari, Salarian, and turians to help them protect the Citadel.


Would they? As far as I can tell, the human-led Council has an interesting opportunity known as a political hostage situation. If the human-led Council simply refused to leave after the fleets arrived, what are the fleets then going to do? Do they intend to open fire on the Citadel? Your gun doesn't matter if you aren't willing to use it.

This trading center has ties to the Salarian, Turian, and Asari governments.  The Alliance can't strong-arm the trading center without strong-arming the governments whom they represent.  Some merchants can be independent but its likely that most are Government funded. I'm sure their are some stores ranned by the Council.


There is a possibility that some of the stores on the Citadel are run by the respective governments. However, the problem with your argument is you are blurring a command economy with a market economy. As far as I can tell, the Citadel has a market economy and that means that a great of the economic sector within the Citadel is actually privately owned. The governments, by this point, are irrelevant. Besides, even if there was some level of command on them, who do you think has the authority to operate those businesses? The governments of those corporations aren't going to matter if humanity runs the very station they are attempting to operate on.

The Destiny Ascension the Asari are pissed off the Alliance didn't save it.  The Turians aren't honoring the treaty of Farixen their building dreadnoughts and warships at an alarming rate.  The Asari ceding their shares of defences to the Turians is an act of rebelling under Alliance rule.   Connect the Dots you can see they're plotting together.
The Salarians would rather have a Council seat then be a pawn for the Alliance. The Salarians have allied with the other Council races for more then a 1,000 years why would they ally with the Alliance and oppose the other Council races after one battle. The Salarians are smart they know the COuncil races united are far more powerful then the Alliance by itself.


No offense, but this is flawed logical reasoning. Your assumption that because the Asari are ceding their shares of defences and the Turians are refusing to acknowledge treaties with the human-led Council aren't necessarily signs that they are plotting. While it is true that it is a possibility that they are plotting, there is also the possibility that the turians are hoping to intimidate humanity just be increasing it's production. I certainly have to congradulate the turians for giving the press news that they would be upping their dreadnaught counts, plots certainly work well when you tell your enemy ahead of time what you intend to do. I will contest the point that it really doesn't make sense for the Salarians to side with the Alliance if it means they still won't be in power, however I still have to point out that your argument is based upon assumptions that are in turn based on a series of premises that may not be so connected to one another after all.

The volus are a client race for the turians,  the Elcor owe space-fligt to the Asari, The Citadel and COuncil races have been building Alliances with each other while Humanity was in the stone age.  The Volus, Elcor, and Hanar have prospered for a 1,000 years under Council rule.
They don't have to build a Citadel they could form a "capitol" to oppose the Alliance's influence.  No matter how powerful you think the Alliance is they can't protect the Citadel and their Colonies without support from the other races and enemies on all sides.  The Alliance would have to choose to protect the Citadel or their Colonies either way the Alliance would be crippled..


The Volus are merchants and economic powerhouses. They are loyal to two things: whoever controls the trading outpost and whoever can protect them. Humanity controls the former, the turians can do the latter. If you think the Volus are willing to walk away from all of the profits they could be making on the Citadel in the meantime that this capitol is being created, I think I would like to meet your accounting professor. I would agree with you on the non-Council races only if it weren't for the fact that, as is, they aren't in power anyways no matter what the consequence. It is not in their interest to pull themselves away from the Citadel and get caught up in a war that isn't theirs to fight. Likewise for the Elcor, could you come up with something more tangible that the Elcor owe the Asari? As in maybe the Elcor owe the Asari $10? Simply because you do a favor for someone does not mean they have to come to your aid under any circumstances.

As for the capitol, I think you greatly overestimate the drive of the former races to attack the human-led Council. In fact, as far as I can tell from the game, humanity came to power completely legally. The aliens were confused and had a problem they never faced before, humanity offered solutions. Now that humanity is choosing to leave them out of the loop, the aliens are still just as clueless as to what to do as they were when the Council died in the first place. This is why the riots have been isolated incidents that have easily been put down. If the Turians REALLY wanted to get rid of humanity, it wouldn't be telling humanity that it is building an invasionary force to attack them.

 
The Alliance only keeps power if the other races are willing or if the
Alliance can find a powerful ally. Again 2 years is not enough time to
overthrow the Alliance.  Why are you saying only the Turians, yes they
have the military might, don't forget STG, Asari Commandos,  And the
funding and military aid the Turians would get from the other races



I think you might be confusing this power with that of the UN sort of system where the power of the UN is particularly limited. Let's change the circumstances a little bit. Let's assume for a moment that New York City secedes from the United States and comes directly into the control of the United Nations. The United Nations has soverignty over New York City now, however the countries who make up the United Nations do not maintain soverignty of NYC because the United Nations is it's own legal entity at the sametime in a similar manner to how the 50 states make up the United States, but no one state can claim federal property under its control. This is precisely how the Citadel works. While it is true that the Council is made up of pacts of multiple species and doesn't have a whole lot of jurisdiction over non-members anymore, the Citadel is directly controlled by the Council. Don't believe me? Look up the definition of a government and you will see that to be a government, you must have to abilities: the ability to coerce and the ability to generate revenue. C-Sec is the coercion factor of the Citadel and we also know that C-Sec can collect fines and money for permits, which fullfills the ability to generate revenue. What you confuse as the Citadel being under the control of the Council Races is not true at all because the Citadel is under the Sovereignty of the Council itself, which humanity controls; thus meaning humanity controls the Citadel. The defense of the Citadel does not really require the other races once we have established this point.

Now, as for aid, let me use another example. Suppose for a moment that you are a middle-class peasant with no voting rights and no representation in the government of Blahblah. I am attempting to raise a coup against the government of Blahblah and I ask you for your support. If you like, you can even suppose that I once helped finance once of your businesses and thus you owe me a favor. However because I am asking for your support, there is a good chance that you will have to give up the life you known in your community and also give up all of your businesses that are within the well-established community until I win. You get nothing profitable and you still get no voting rights, only the knowledge that you helped a friend. Somehow, I don't think you are going to be quite so willing to help me out if there is nothing for you to gain. This is exactly what would happen to the non-Council races. They had no representation under the former regime and they won't have any representation now. The only thing they have to gain from helping the turians is the possibility that humanity will simply kick them off of the Citadel, which will ultimately result in them losing their homes and employment. Remember that power of the purse I mentioned? This is precisely why I mentioned it.

The Alliance remains cluesless to the Reaper threat.  The Alliance isn't doing itself any favors by saying the Reapers don't exist.  The Alliance would get more support if they capitalized on the Reaper threat.by saying its real.  So you're telling me after 30 years the Alliance is far more powerful then all the races combined that have been around for 1,000+ years.  The aliens aren't stuck with the Alliance after 2 years the Aliens are already undermining the Alliance.  The only leverage the Alliance has is more ships to protect the Citadel and they are begging for the other races help.  The Alliance can't carry the weight of the Galaxy on their shoulders without the support of the other races.
Their is no doubt the Alliance has become more powerful in the last 2 years but it can't match the power of the Council races yet..
 


Correction: The Alliance KNOWS of the Reaper threat. The Alliance has merely convinced everyone that it doesn't exist. Denying something is true is not an indication that one has no knowledge of it. This is a phenomena called lying, which requires me to have knowledge of something but then pretend that I have knowledge of something else. You contested in your second comment that the Alliance isn't doing itself any favors by saying the Reaper's don't exist. If the Alliance didn't know the Reapers didn't exist, why would they have been so quick to sweep of Sovereign's remains?

Now for my second point, I didn't say the Alliance is far more powerful then all of the races combined. Quite the contrary actually because I acknowledged the fact that the Alliance certainly don't come into power because of merit. What actually happened is that humanity got lucky with multiple incidents and obtained power as a result. The aliens have never faced something like this before, they haven't even had a real war in a millenia, and as a result have been slacking on an idea similar to brinkmanship that was embraced by the US-Soviets in the Cold War. What the aliens don't realize, however, is that humanity is growing more and more powerful the longer they wait (especially if you are playing a ReneShep).

As Shandepard has pointed out countless times, if the races had any inclination of war; why wait? What could they possibly have to gain by sitting around for 2 years and not doing anything about it short of a few isolated riots? What you perceive as acts of war, I perceive as acts of brinkmanship. The aliens are scrambling to figure out what to do and brinkmanship seems like a good option to them. Brinkmanship can easily escalate into war, but the Council races appear to be doing anything possible to avoid that, otherwise they would have already jumped into it. After all with your analysis, they have been more powerful than humanity from the get-go; why wait?

Modifié par DarkSeraphym, 04 octobre 2010 - 06:32 .


#70
DarkSeraphym

DarkSeraphym
  • Members
  • 825 messages

Barquiel wrote...

DarkSeraphym wrote...

Really, I think it is neither one. What is far more likely, as I mentioned above, is a problem similar to "shell shock" with respect to politics instead of combat. The other races had no idea what to do in this sort of crisis and turned to what seemed like a decent option at the time, kind of similar to how post-WW1 Germany had no idea how to handle its economic problems and turned to someone who stood up and said he could offer solutions, a man known as Adolph Hitler.



That's my problem...the situations are nothing alike.

Germany fought for 4 years...and lost.
- they lost millions of soldiers
- Germany's allies (Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Empire) have collapsed.
- food-shortage in german cities
- revolution
So, when the allies presented the Treaty of Versailles, there was nothing the german diplomats could do about it (Ludendorff/Hindenburg made this clear to the politicians).

On the other hand, the council races lost one battle! Their colonies and fleets are (more or less) intact. Their political system is stable.

Udina presents his plans of an all-human council.
1) Why does anyone take this council seriously?
Let's us assume that the turians break some council law. What can an all-human council do?
- military intervention?
no...the turians have the largest fleet in citadel space
- economic sanctions?
Who cares? The alliance economy is tiny. They would be futile if the asari/salarians don't agree.
2) Why doesn't the turian government (asari/salarians) send a new annoying councilor?
escort: 30 dreadnoughts
Who wants to stop them? Hackett's fifth fleet? C-Sec?



To make some comparisons of my own to that situation:

The Battle of the Citadel:
-Millions of lives lost in a single event
-The military presence of all three alliances was crushed by a force that the Citadel had never even anticipated
-Immense infrastructure damage is done to the Citadel as a result

The situations aren't the same at all, but they do have some common elements. The thing that really makes me think the alien races are totally dumbfounded is the massive level of destruction done to life and infrastructure on the Citadel itself, nonetheless by a force that the Citadel didn't even see coming. That would put me in shock for damn sure to say the very least.

The answer is likely simple; that the thousands of years that these races have used the Council have made them entirely dependent on it. I think this is one of the many contradictions in the Mass Effect Universe because although the Council seems to be very similar in structure to the United Nations; why does the Council also appear to be more powerful than the United Nations at the sametime? What would cause the races to become so dependent on it in the first place?

Likewise as I mentioned in the previous post, this common comparison doesn't work anyways. As far as I know, the United Nations is an organization and not a government: it lacks the ability to generate revenue and to coerce all on its own. This is not the case for the Council, which does generate revenue and does have its own police force. If the turians did get real out of line, the human-led Council could possibly expell many turians from their homes on the Citadel and leave them as refugees. It could possibly even use them as political hostages.

I'm just kind of throwing ideas out really. Your guess is as good as mine. As I said, the Council has to be more than what the developers claim it is if the Council has actual powers that fit the actual definition of what it takes to be a government.

Modifié par DarkSeraphym, 04 octobre 2010 - 06:38 .


#71
Zulu_DFA

Zulu_DFA
  • Members
  • 8 217 messages

Barquiel wrote...
2) Why doesn't the turian government (asari/salarians) send a new annoying councilor?
escort: 30 dreadnoughts


Because apperently their losses were heavier than it seemed from the cinematic, especially if you advised the Alliance's fleet to hold back and not relieve them.

The Council meeting, before the Normandy's grounding and hi-jacking: Council fleets are amassing around the Citadel awaiting Saren's attack.

Udina giving the All-Human Council speech: their fleets were decimated during the attack.

Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 04 octobre 2010 - 06:47 .


#72
Barquiel

Barquiel
  • Members
  • 5 854 messages
The citadel fleet was everywhere, but not where it should have been (=defending the citadel)

"Patrols are stationed at every mass relay linking citadel space to the terminus systems!"

...and a dev confirmed that the fifth fleet was the largest concentration of military force near the Citadel.

#73
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 684 messages

Barquiel wrote...

The citadel fleet was everywhere, but not where it should have been (=defending the citadel)

"Patrols are stationed at every mass relay linking citadel space to the terminus systems!"

...and a dev confirmed that the fifth fleet was the largest concentration of military force near the Citadel.

Without knowing about the Conduit, keeping the Citadel fleet at the Citadel would be useless.

The relays are the only realistic avenues of approach. Without reason to be at Citadel, ships at the Citadel are just a stragic reserve, they aren't actually defending it from attack by blocking the approaches.

#74
jbblue05

jbblue05
  • Members
  • 1 480 messages
[quote]DarkSeraphym wrote...


Would they? As far as I can tell, the human-led Council has an interesting opportunity known as a political hostage situation. If the human-led Council simply refused to leave after the fleets arrived, what are the fleets then going to do? Do they intend to open fire on the Citadel? Your gun doesn't matter if you aren't willing to use it.
[/quote]
Why are you saying human-led don't you mean all-human.  The turians are eager to bomb their problems.  The Alliance need every ship they have they're not going to let them get slaughtered when their is another alternative..
[quote]

There is a possibility that some of the stores on the Citadel are run by the respective governments. However, the problem with your argument is you are blurring a command economy with a market economy. As far as I can tell, the Citadel has a market economy and that means that a great of the economic sector within the Citadel is actually privately owned. The governments, by this point, are irrelevant. Besides, even if there was some level of command on them, who do you think has the authority to operate those businesses? The governments of those corporations aren't going to matter if humanity runs the very station they are attempting to operate on.

[/quote]
You can't assume evrything is privately owned and I can't assume if iits governement owned.  Since most of the Citadel is Asari, Turian, and Salarian exclusive. The governments could easily shut down their businesses sure they would take losses but the Alliance would also.  The Alliance can't control a store if its not their anymore

[quote]
No offense, but this is flawed logical reasoning. Your assumption that because the Asari are ceding their shares of defences and the Turians are refusing to acknowledge treaties with the human-led Council aren't necessarily signs that they are plotting. While it is true that it is a possibility that they are plotting, there is also the possibility that the turians are hoping to intimidate humanity just be increasing it's production. I certainly have to congradulate the turians for giving the press news that they would be upping their dreadnaught counts, plots certainly work well when you tell your enemy ahead of time what you intend to do. I will contest the point that it really doesn't make sense for the Salarians to side with the Alliance if it means they still won't be in power, however I still have to point out that your argument is based upon assumptions that are in turn based on a series of premises that may not be so connected to one another after all.

[/quote]
I could easily say your logic is just assumption that the Turians are just trying to intimidate.  The turians have shown in the past that they are eager for a fight not to mention the Alliance and Turians have bad-blood. The Asari siding with the Turians is a clear sign they don't accept human rule.

The volus are a client race for the turians,  the Elcor owe space-fligt to the Asari, The Citadel and COuncil races have been building Alliances with each other while Humanity was in the stone age.  The Volus, Elcor, and Hanar have prospered for a 1,000 years under Council rule.
They don't have to build a Citadel they could form a "capitol" to oppose the Alliance's influence.  No matter how powerful you think the Alliance is they can't protect the Citadel and their Colonies without support from the other races and enemies on all sides.  The Alliance would have to choose to protect the Citadel or their Colonies either way the Alliance would be crippled..[/quote]
[quote]
The Volus are merchants and economic powerhouses. They are loyal to two things: whoever controls the trading outpost and whoever can protect them. Humanity controls the former, the turians can do the latter. If you think the Volus are willing to walk away from all of the profits they could be making on the Citadel in the meantime that this capitol is being created, I think I would like to meet your accounting professor. I would agree with you on the non-Council races only if it weren't for the fact that, as is, they aren't in power anyways no matter what the consequence. It is not in their interest to pull themselves away from the Citadel and get caught up in a war that isn't theirs to fight. Likewise for the Elcor, could you come up with something more tangible that the Elcor owe the Asari? As in maybe the Elcor owe the Asari $10? Simply because you do a favor for someone does not mean they have to come to your aid under any circumstances.
[/quote]
The Volus would like their colonies protected more. If the Turians pull out their support the Volus would be prey to pirates and slavers.  The Alliance is already overwhelmed by their responsibility they would deny the Volus request for defense.  The Volus would only have two options have their economy ravaged by pirates or pull out economic support for the Alliance so the Turians will defend their colonies.

The Elcor don't like sudden change the Elcor have a strong alliance with the Asari and the non-human races. Humanity has no allies and their not doing themselves any favors by exempting other races from the Council.

[quote]
As for the capitol, I think you greatly overestimate the drive of the former races to attack the human-led Council
 In fact, as far as I can tell from the game, humanity came to power completely legally. The aliens were confused and had a problem they never faced before, humanity offered solutions. Now that humanity is choosing to leave them out of the loop, the aliens are still just as clueless as to what to do as they were when the Council died in the first place. This is why the riots have been isolated incidents that have easily been put down. If the Turians REALLY wanted to get rid of humanity, it wouldn't be telling humanity that it is building an invasionary force to attack them.
[/quote]
You can't over or underestimate the Council's drive its only been 2 years.  Humanity didn't come to power traditionally they siezed power.  Humanity never faced the problem either they all have equal experience.  The only difference is the Alliance showed up at the last second while the Council races endured most of the battle.  The riots aren't isolated its about Humanity siezing power and Destiny Ascension being blown up.  The turians aren't making up an Invasionary force the Alliance confirmed it.  The turians are militants they don't hide behind politics.

[quote]
I think you might be confusing this power with that of the UN sort of system where the power of the UN is particularly limited. Let's change the circumstances a little bit. Let's assume for a moment that New York City secedes from the United States and comes directly into the control of the United Nations. The United Nations has soverignty over New York City now, however the countries who make up the United Nations do not maintain soverignty of NYC because the United Nations is it's own legal entity at the sametime in a similar manner to how the 50 states make up the United States, but no one state can claim federal property under its control. This is precisely how the Citadel works. While it is true that the Council is made up of pacts of multiple species and doesn't have a whole lot of jurisdiction over non-members anymore, the Citadel is directly controlled by the Council. Don't believe me? Look up the definition of a government and you will see that to be a government, you must have to abilities: the ability to coerce and the ability to generate revenue. C-Sec is the coercion factor of the Citadel and we also know that C-Sec can collect fines and money for permits, which fullfills the ability to generate revenue. What you confuse as the Citadel being under the control of the Council Races is not true at all because the Citadel is under the Sovereignty of the Council itself, which humanity controls; thus meaning humanity controls the Citadel. The defense of the Citadel does not really require the other races once we have established this point.
[/quote]
Alliance can't handle the responsibility that's why they are asking the other races for help defending the Citadel.  The Alliance can only control the Citadel if the other races fall in line.  If they don't the Citadel would just be a large human colony.
I'm not comparing it to the UN the Council has always been multi-racial  an all-human Council is different so an all-human Council can expect a different response from its ciivillians

[quote]
Now, as for aid, let me use another example. Suppose for a moment that you are a middle-class peasant with no voting rights and no representation in the government of Blahblah. I am attempting to raise a coup against the government of Blahblah and I ask you for your support. If you like, you can even suppose that I once helped finance once of your businesses and thus you owe me a favor. However because I am asking for your support, there is a good chance that you will have to give up the life you known in your community and also give up all of your businesses that are within the well-established community until I win. You get nothing profitable and you still get no voting rights, only the knowledge that you helped a friend. Somehow, I don't think you are going to be quite so willing to help me out if there is nothing for you to gain. This is exactly what would happen to the non-Council races. They had no representation under the former regime and they won't have any representation now. The only thing they have to gain from helping the turians is the possibility that humanity will simply kick them off of the Citadel, which will ultimately result in them losing their homes and employment. Remember that power of the purse I mentioned? This is precisely why I mentioned it.
[/quote]

Bad analogy the turians, salarians. and asari are powerful and highly respected races throughout the galaxy.
[quote]
Correction: The Alliance KNOWS of the Reaper threat. The Alliance has merely convinced everyone that it doesn't exist. Denying something is true is not an indication that one has no knowledge of it. This is a phenomena called lying, which requires me to have knowledge of something but then pretend that I have knowledge of something else. You contested in your second comment that the Alliance isn't doing itself any favors by saying the Reaper's don't exist. If the Alliance didn't know the Reapers didn't exist, why would they have been so quick to sweep of Sovereign's remains?
[/quote]
Correction: The Alliance doesn't know  if you killed or saved the Council they both deny the existence of the Reapers and write Sovereign off as a Geth ship

[quote]
Now for my second point, I didn't say the Alliance is far more powerful then all of the races combined. Quite the contrary actually because I acknowledged the fact that the Alliance certainly don't come into power because of merit. What actually happened is that humanity got lucky with multiple incidents and obtained power as a result. The aliens have never faced something like this before, they haven't even had a real war in a millenia, and as a result have been slacking on an idea similar to brinkmanship that was embraced by the US-Soviets in the Cold War. What the aliens don't realize, however, is that humanity is growing more and more powerful the longer they wait (especially if you are playing a ReneShep).
[/quote]
I do play a renegade Shepard.  If you save or kill the Council the Alliance makes huge gains.  The Alliance and the aliens never faced a threat like the Reapers before. The Alliance got lucky but they didn't have ships protecting the Citadel.
[quote] 
As Shandepard has pointed out countless times, if the races had any inclination of war; why wait? What could they possibly have to gain by sitting around for 2 years and not doing anything about it short of a few isolated riots? What you perceive as acts of war, I perceive as acts of brinkmanship. The aliens are scrambling to figure out what to do and brinkmanship seems like a good option to them. Brinkmanship can easily escalate into war, but the Council races appear to be doing anything possible to avoid that, otherwise they would have already jumped into it. After all with your analysis, they have been more powerful than humanity from the get-go; why wait?
l
[/quote]

Why not let the Alliance strain itself with its responsibility while you rebuild in comfort.  The aliens knows the Alliance's history they know the Alliance is just as oblivious to the Reaper threat just as they are.
What Humanity is doing is similar to what the Turians did to the Krogans, what STG did to the League of One, and what the Krogan did to the Rachni.
They are gaining respect from the other races. That doesn't mean they are going to willingly accept the race as a dictator

If it was an act of brinkmanship the Alliance would make things seem worse then they appear. The Alliance is trying to make everyone feel safe and things are back to normal

#75
Zulu_DFA

Zulu_DFA
  • Members
  • 8 217 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Barquiel wrote...

The citadel fleet was everywhere, but not where it should have been (=defending the citadel)

"Patrols are stationed at every mass relay linking citadel space to the terminus systems!"

...and a dev confirmed that the fifth fleet was the largest concentration of military force near the Citadel.

Without knowing about the Conduit, keeping the Citadel fleet at the Citadel would be useless.

The relays are the only realistic avenues of approach. Without reason to be at Citadel, ships at the Citadel are just a stragic reserve, they aren't actually defending it from attack by blocking the approaches.


I think I'm lost now...

So how did Sovereign and the Geth manage to bypass all those patrols and reach the Citadel? They didn't come from the Conduit with Saren, did they?