Why do you assume he exists?
One of my favorite parts about DA lore is that, unlike many other fantasy genres, the existence of a God or Gods is not obvious. In D&D there is no dispute; Clerics get their powers from prayers, or hell, you could even go visit them on their home plane if you're powerful enough. They even walked on the Prime during the Time of Troubles. In D&D the non-believers are generally just people who refuse to venerate the gods.
In DA, things the debate is not so cut and dried. The argument for the existence of The Maker is much like the "argument from design" that people use today. In the DA universe the fact that magic exists means that "physics" doesn't work the same as it does here on Earth, but it is no more an argument for the existence of the Maker than the Moon or the stars are an argument for God here on Earth. In fact, magic provides a pretty strong argument for the NON-existence of Gods by providing a mechanism for many so-called miracles.
Indeed, the OP's bias appears to be showing: why assume that the Chantry's "Maker" exists, as opposed to the Gods of the Elves? Probably the same reason that people in the U.S. have this debate almost solely with regard to the Christian God; not because his existence is more likely than any other god, but simply because it is the one that they identify with the most.
Modifié par Pauravi, 05 octobre 2010 - 12:21 .