Aller au contenu

Photo

So, how does The Maker looks like? Will we ever know?


184 réponses à ce sujet

#101
DMC12

DMC12
  • Members
  • 316 messages

joriandrake wrote...


the whole argument seems to forget that this is a question a bout a fantasy God of a fantasy world, it doesn't matter if one is in RL atheist or if not what religion he/she belongs to, and yes we do have facts from lore that make it looks as if the Maker exists, but that doesn't exclude possibilities like that it is a Dragon or a girl or just a superstrong entity from the future that just travelled back in time and created everything + life to make a nice paradoxon



Oh... My... God... The Maker is a Reaper-Shepard hybrid with Dr. Manhattan-like powers.

#102
SirShreK

SirShreK
  • Members
  • 855 messages

GodWood wrote...
Then why can't an after life exist without the need of ever being created?


Did I say that?

#103
tool_bot

tool_bot
  • Members
  • 536 messages

GodWood wrote...
Then why can't an after life exist without the need of ever being created?


Because they can't be arsed to think their beliefs through far enough.

#104
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages
What if God was one of us?

#105
Pauravi

Pauravi
  • Members
  • 1 989 messages

joriandrake wrote...

the presence of afterlife already makes it clear that someone had to make it and get it to work


No it doesn't.
That's
like saying "the presence of trees makes it clear that someone made
them and got them to work".  It simply isn't self-evident just from the
fact of its existence.


General Malor wrote...

What about the Urn of Sacred ashes? Proof that Andraste's remains were blessed by the Maker to have holy effects and heal the sick.

Or proof that someone, perhaps even one of her followers, magicked-up her ashes and turned her into a "healing potion".  Or lingering effects of magic used in an attempted resurrection.  Or Andraste's latent magical abilities.  Or perhaps they aren't even her ashes at all -- just some ashes that someone casted a spell on and said were hers.  There are several plausible explanations that don't require inventing a supreme being -- the means to explain it exist in the halls of any Circle Tower.

Once you week through the lies and what not it would seem that at least the Chantry got it right that there was a being known as Andraste, there was a Golden City(Which you can see whenever you enter the fade so IT IS there and is real...as real as anything in the fade is), that humans entered the Golden City turning it black(which again you can see from the fade)...

Actually I haven't seen any proof that it used to be a Golden City, and even if it was, that doesn't mean that it turned black for the reasons that the Chantry say.

... and that there is a Maker.

Which follows from what?  Neither the existence of the Black City, nor the magical effects of Andraste's ashes are any proof whatsoever of The Maker's existence.  It is only proof of the Chantry's ability to explain things in the context of their own religion.  The Black City has existed for ages upon ages -- The Chantry just invented a story about it that backs up their dogma.  The people who made it up may even believe it, but that doesn't make it true.

#106
SirShreK

SirShreK
  • Members
  • 855 messages

Pauravi wrote...

joriandrake wrote...

the presence of afterlife already makes it clear that someone had to make it and get it to work


No it doesn't.
That's
like saying "the presence of trees makes it clear that someone made
them and got them to work".  It simply isn't self-evident just from the
fact of its existence.


General Malor wrote...

What about the Urn of Sacred ashes? Proof that Andraste's remains were blessed by the Maker to have holy effects and heal the sick.

Or proof that someone, perhaps even one of her followers, magicked-up her ashes and turned her into a "healing potion".  Or lingering effects of magic used in an attempted resurrection.  Or Andraste's latent magical abilities.  Or perhaps they aren't even her ashes at all -- just some ashes that someone casted a spell on and said were hers.  There are several plausible explanations that don't require inventing a supreme being -- the means to explain it exist in the halls of any Circle Tower.

Once you week through the lies and what not it would seem that at least the Chantry got it right that there was a being known as Andraste, there was a Golden City(Which you can see whenever you enter the fade so IT IS there and is real...as real as anything in the fade is), that humans entered the Golden City turning it black(which again you can see from the fade)...

Actually I haven't seen any proof that it used to be a Golden City, and even if it was, that doesn't mean that it turned black for the reasons that the Chantry say.

... and that there is a Maker.

Which follows from what?  Neither the existence of the Black City, nor the magical effects of Andraste's ashes are any proof whatsoever of The Maker's existence.  It is only proof of the Chantry's ability to explain things in the context of their own religion.  The Black City has existed for ages upon ages -- The Chantry just invented a story about it that backs up their dogma.  The people who made it up may even believe it, but that doesn't make it true.


Dude. Before making oh so bold claims.. read the lore!!!

#107
tool_bot

tool_bot
  • Members
  • 536 messages

SirShreK wrote...

tool_bot wrote...

SirShreK wrote...
One of the popular requirements for being a god is that He is the Prime creator and exists by himself without the need of being created.


And this isn't arbitrary why?


Same reason as there is an Uncertainty principle.


I was wondering when someone would be all like 'Qunatum Jumping!'

Can't go five minutes into a religious discussion without someone butchering physics.

#108
joriandrake

joriandrake
  • Members
  • 3 161 messages

GodWood wrote...

SirShreK wrote...

GodWood wrote...

joriandrake wrote...

tool_bot wrote...

joriandrake wrote...

tool_bot wrote...
You can always tell who was raised in a Westernized religion by how they assume any kind of afterlife validates a deity.

the presence of afterlife already makes it clear that someone had to make it and get it to work

Oh? How so?

We could now argue about buddhist/shinto and christian and a lot other beliefs and life cycles without any result at all, but for the argument lets just say even a wheel has to be made so it can turn

Then who made the thing that made the wheel?

One of the popular requirements for being a god is that He is the Prime creator and exists by himself without the need of being created.

Then why can't an after life exist without the need of ever being created?

for the same reason why the world can't exist without the need of ever being created





there

now we "went a full circle", and we can restart the whole debate from the same starting point, but to not lose my sanity from religious discussions I reconfirm that my head is still on its place, that I stil have my own beliefs that noone will be able to change, and that any further arguing would not lead anywhere, and then I leave this thread for good while carefully backing out step by step

Modifié par joriandrake, 05 octobre 2010 - 12:45 .


#109
tool_bot

tool_bot
  • Members
  • 536 messages

SirShreK wrote...

GodWood wrote...
Then why can't an after life exist without the need of ever being created?


Did I say that?


you kinda did.

#110
SirShreK

SirShreK
  • Members
  • 855 messages

tool_bot wrote...

GodWood wrote...
Then why can't an after life exist without the need of ever being created?


Because they can't be arsed to think their beliefs through far enough.


Funny.

one of the real difficult questions is, how to prove that when God reveals Himself (Assuming He would) that He IS THE God.

#111
tool_bot

tool_bot
  • Members
  • 536 messages

joriandrake wrote...
that I stil have my own leiefs that noone will be able to change


which is why I will be mocking you

#112
Pauravi

Pauravi
  • Members
  • 1 989 messages

SirShreK wrote...

tool_bot wrote...

SirShreK wrote...
One of the popular requirements for being a god is that He is the Prime creator and exists by himself without the need of being created.


And this isn't arbitrary why?


Same reason as there is an Uncertainty principle.


You don't understand the Uncertainty Principle as well as you think you do.
Invoking it here makes no sense at all.

#113
SirShreK

SirShreK
  • Members
  • 855 messages

tool_bot wrote...

SirShreK wrote...

tool_bot wrote...

SirShreK wrote...
One of the popular requirements for being a god is that He is the Prime creator and exists by himself without the need of being created.


And this isn't arbitrary why?


Same reason as there is an Uncertainty principle.


I was wondering when someone would be all like 'Qunatum Jumping!'

Can't go five minutes into a religious discussion without someone butchering physics.


Excuse me? I work with Quantum physics every day. I am a Physicist!

#114
Burritos

Burritos
  • Members
  • 150 messages
look, morgan freeman is the maker end of discussion

#115
SirShreK

SirShreK
  • Members
  • 855 messages

Pauravi wrote...

SirShreK wrote...

tool_bot wrote...

SirShreK wrote...
One of the popular requirements for being a god is that He is the Prime creator and exists by himself without the need of being created.


And this isn't arbitrary why?


Same reason as there is an Uncertainty principle.


You don't understand the Uncertainty Principle as well as you think you do.
Invoking it here makes no sense at all.


......

How did you arrive at that?

#116
tool_bot

tool_bot
  • Members
  • 536 messages

SirShreK wrote...

tool_bot wrote...

GodWood wrote...
Then why can't an after life exist without the need of ever being created?


Because they can't be arsed to think their beliefs through far enough.


Funny.

one of the real difficult questions is, how to prove that when God reveals Himself (Assuming He would) that He IS THE God.


More Westernized gibberish.

That which birthed all things into this world as far as I'm concerned is Tiamat.

#117
GodWood

GodWood
  • Members
  • 7 954 messages

SirShreK wrote...

GodWood wrote...
Then why can't an after life exist without the need of ever being created?

Did I say that?

Sorreh, assumed you were the same person from within the quote tree.
I should pay more attention...

#118
joriandrake

joriandrake
  • Members
  • 3 161 messages

SirShreK wrote...

tool_bot wrote...

GodWood wrote...
Then why can't an after life exist without the need of ever being created?


Because they can't be arsed to think their beliefs through far enough.


Funny.

one of the real difficult questions is, how to prove that when God reveals Himself (Assuming He would) that He IS THE God.


with so many atheists and different religions it would probably be impossible without overriding the brain of every human at the same time, even the Church itself would have problems to accept that God came to say hi, and stays over for dinner

#119
General Malor

General Malor
  • Members
  • 285 messages

SirShreK wrote...

Pauravi wrote...

joriandrake wrote...

the presence of afterlife already makes it clear that someone had to make it and get it to work


No it doesn't.
That's
like saying "the presence of trees makes it clear that someone made
them and got them to work".  It simply isn't self-evident just from the
fact of its existence.


General Malor wrote...

What about the Urn of Sacred ashes? Proof that Andraste's remains were blessed by the Maker to have holy effects and heal the sick.

Or proof that someone, perhaps even one of her followers, magicked-up her ashes and turned her into a "healing potion".  Or lingering effects of magic used in an attempted resurrection.  Or Andraste's latent magical abilities.  Or perhaps they aren't even her ashes at all -- just some ashes that someone casted a spell on and said were hers.  There are several plausible explanations that don't require inventing a supreme being -- the means to explain it exist in the halls of any Circle Tower.

Once you week through the lies and what not it would seem that at least the Chantry got it right that there was a being known as Andraste, there was a Golden City(Which you can see whenever you enter the fade so IT IS there and is real...as real as anything in the fade is), that humans entered the Golden City turning it black(which again you can see from the fade)...

Actually I haven't seen any proof that it used to be a Golden City, and even if it was, that doesn't mean that it turned black for the reasons that the Chantry say.

... and that there is a Maker.

Which follows from what?  Neither the existence of the Black City, nor the magical effects of Andraste's ashes are any proof whatsoever of The Maker's existence.  It is only proof of the Chantry's ability to explain things in the context of their own religion.  The Black City has existed for ages upon ages -- The Chantry just invented a story about it that backs up their dogma.  The people who made it up may even believe it, but that doesn't make it true.


Dude. Before making oh so bold claims.. read the lore!!!


What he said...at the very end there. I think people need to keep in mind that this is a fake world so what the lore says happened...happened. Kinda obvious. Lore says the Maker made things, so the Maker made things. Lore states that it is Andraste's ashes in the Urn, blessed by the Maker, so those are Andraste's blessed ashes.

I don't see how this could be an argument when the lore states clearly what is and isn't.

#120
joriandrake

joriandrake
  • Members
  • 3 161 messages

tool_bot wrote...

SirShreK wrote...

tool_bot wrote...

GodWood wrote...
Then why can't an after life exist without the need of ever being created?


Because they can't be arsed to think their beliefs through far enough.


Funny.

one of the real difficult questions is, how to prove that when God reveals Himself (Assuming He would) that He IS THE God.


More Westernized gibberish.

That which birthed all things into this world as far as I'm concerned is Tiamat.


oh, the trolls are here, now I really gtg

#121
tool_bot

tool_bot
  • Members
  • 536 messages

SirShreK wrote...

Pauravi wrote...

You don't understand the Uncertainty Principle as well as you think you do.
Invoking it here makes no sense at all.


......

How did you arrive at that?


You brought it up in a discussion that had nothing to do with it.

#122
SirShreK

SirShreK
  • Members
  • 855 messages

joriandrake wrote...

SirShreK wrote...

tool_bot wrote...

GodWood wrote...
Then why can't an after life exist without the need of ever being created?


Because they can't be arsed to think their beliefs through far enough.


Funny.

one of the real difficult questions is, how to prove that when God reveals Himself (Assuming He would) that He IS THE God.


with so many atheists and different religions it would probably be impossible without overriding the brain of every human at the same time, even the Church itself would have problems to accept that God came to say hi, and stays over for dinner


Just to put my views on table with the hope that nobody will jump me (:D):

I think God will never appear. Otherwise bye bye Free Will.

#123
tool_bot

tool_bot
  • Members
  • 536 messages

joriandrake wrote...

oh, the trolls are here, now I really gtg


Have fun never learning anything new or trying to challenge your mind.^_^

#124
GodWood

GodWood
  • Members
  • 7 954 messages

joriandrake wrote...

GodWood wrote...

SirShreK wrote...

GodWood wrote...

joriandrake wrote...

tool_bot wrote...

joriandrake wrote...

tool_bot wrote...
You can always tell who was raised in a Westernized religion by how they assume any kind of afterlife validates a deity.

the presence of afterlife already makes it clear that someone had to make it and get it to work

Oh? How so?

We could now argue about buddhist/shinto and christian and a lot other beliefs and life cycles without any result at all, but for the argument lets just say even a wheel has to be made so it can turn

Then who made the thing that made the wheel?

One of the popular requirements for being a god is that He is the Prime creator and exists by himself without the need of being created.

Then why can't an after life exist without the need of ever being created?

for the same reason why the world can't exist without the need of ever being created

there

now we "went a full circle", and we can restart the whole debate from the same starting point, but to not lose my sanity from religious discussions I reconfirm that my head is still on its place, that I stil have my own beliefs that noone will be able to change, and that any further arguing would not lead anywhere, and then I leave this thread for good while carefully backing out step by step

I've lost interest.

#125
SirShreK

SirShreK
  • Members
  • 855 messages

tool_bot wrote...

SirShreK wrote...

Pauravi wrote...

You don't understand the Uncertainty Principle as well as you think you do.
Invoking it here makes no sense at all.


......

How did you arrive at that?


You brought it up in a discussion that had nothing to do with it.


Listen I am already tired of this discussion. But I will make a last Ditch attempt.

The point I was making there was:

You cannot question a Physical Law . It is a static principle of nature... (like the universal constants whose values are almost never explainable).