CoS Sarah Jinstar wrote...
Could be David, could also be when you've played as many CRPG's along a particular settings the companions all start to run together. I admit though, the two BG titles + expansions are my favorites so there may be a tad bit of bias in that conclusion.
They're my favorites, too, but then they were also my first. I think it's possible to look at something you love and still be critical about it. We've advanced our writing techniques a lot since back then-- I think a lot of people forget that you couldn't even click on a BG2 companion to speak with them. They only spoke to you, at random intervals.
Whether the characters themselves were more interesting, I don't know. That's subjective. At least you had a nice long game to get to know them over, though I think people might forget the fact that they more or less ran out of things to say to you half-way through the game.

At any rate, there's always new things to try. If people want to use reductionism to say that our characters are all alike, that's fine. I don't know what it gets them-- if you ignore what's different about most characters (or people, for that matter) they can be fit into convenient categories. I think it's the differences that make them interesting, but what are you going to do? To me, it's always fun exploring someone new.
Brockololly wrote...
I don't quite get the whole "whiny" companion complaint
My experience is that if any companion has an issue, ever, and speaks it aloud someone, somewhere will accuse them of whining. I imagine it has something to do with whether or not you like a character-- in real life if people I don't like tell me about their problems I get irritated, too.
Modifié par David Gaider, 04 octobre 2010 - 03:56 .