DW Warrior vs DW Rogue: what are the pros and cons?
#1
Posté 05 octobre 2010 - 04:41
Just bought DAO on Saturday and I have a question regarding Dual Wielding: what are the differences between being a DW Rogue and a DW Warrior? At some point, I'd like to play as a Rogue, but since I'm not interested in Archery, I'm going to play it as a DW with daggers, and I'd rather not have it feel like a repetition of a DW Warrior.
As a Rogue, I know you get more Skill points, you get to Backstab, you get useful abilities like Lockpicking and Trap Detection and Stealth, but you do not necessarily have access to the best armor or the most weapons, and you're DPS is best when flanking. However, given all the beneficial abilities, the lack of armor and attacking from behind issues seem to be a small price to pay.
Conversely, as a Warrior, the ability to wear better armor and use more weapons doesn't seem to make up for the lack of so many useful abilities that the Rogue has. So I'm think there MUST be some other benefit to dual-wielding as a Warrior, at the very least so that they even out, but I cannot see what it is.
So what am I missing here? Why choose a DW Warrior over a DW Rogue?
#2
Posté 05 octobre 2010 - 04:49
Again, I might just be noticing things wrong.
Modifié par Asepsis, 05 octobre 2010 - 04:50 .
#3
Posté 05 octobre 2010 - 04:58
honestly i can see why bioware dropped the warrior version for DA2
Modifié par nikki191, 05 octobre 2010 - 05:00 .
#4
Posté 05 octobre 2010 - 05:09
#5
Posté 05 octobre 2010 - 05:59
But from a power gaming perspective, you have to go with a Rogue. More skills and backstabs would really be nice to have.
#6
Posté 05 octobre 2010 - 06:37
#7
Posté 05 octobre 2010 - 06:42
#8
Posté 05 octobre 2010 - 06:46
As for heavy armor, I recommend Evons mail & Wade's Superior combo. For massive, Cailans is generous for fatigue.
#9
Posté 05 octobre 2010 - 06:51
So far I see no compelling reason to play a DW Warrior over a DW Rogue, in which case, I might as well play a 2H Warrior and leave the DW for my Rogue.
Modifié par Commander Mad Cat, 05 octobre 2010 - 06:52 .
#10
Posté 05 octobre 2010 - 06:57
Elhanan wrote...
Icky as in appearance? Or effects?
As for heavy armor, I recommend Evons mail & Wade's Superior combo. For massive, Cailans is generous for fatigue.
In appearance.
Anyways I do reccomend a 2H Warrior. They hit hard, and if you get Indomitable, you're immune to Dirty Fighting, Shield Bash, pretty much any ability that involves been stunned or knocked down.
#11
Posté 05 octobre 2010 - 06:59
2H is a good selection.
#12
Posté 05 octobre 2010 - 07:03
Actually I don't think that's what a Hybrid is. I confuse even myself with my curious builds.
Modifié par Jon Jern , 05 octobre 2010 - 07:07 .
#13
Posté 05 octobre 2010 - 10:01
This is the reason why I like the Amy Outfit for female characters. It duplicates the stats of what you actually wear at the moment you put it on. So the custom armor, gloves, and boots that my current character is wearing have the exact same stats with the Battledress of the Provocateur, Red Jenny Seekers, and Bard's Dancing Shoes. To the best of my knowledge this is the only mod that allows you to look good without cheating.Jon Jern wrote...
The light armours are so icky :/ and it doesn't help that the custom armours found on DA Nexus are overpowered.
#14
Posté 05 octobre 2010 - 11:26
Elhanan wrote...
No reason a Rogue cannot wear heavy or massive armors, as there are many good sets available that are fatigue friendly. That said, the new Battledress DLC light armor is fine to wear until later in the game.
True, although I would prefer a warrior then since rogues tend to benefit more damage-wise from cunning than strength. I still feel like rogues shouldn't need heavy armor - they should be backstabbing, and that means someone else has aggro. They can stealth too to get out of trouble.
As for Battledress, it's fine to wear all the way through the game. You might replace it with Felon's Coat when you can get that, but don't fool yourself, Battledress of the Provocateur is one of the very best armors in the game, not only in the beginning but all the way through.
#15
Posté 05 octobre 2010 - 07:09
Elhanan wrote...
No reason a Rogue cannot wear heavy or massive armors, as there are many good sets available that are fatigue friendly. That said, the new Battledress DLC light armor is fine to wear until later in the game.
Just a quick question and I don't mean to derail the topic, but what leather armor is better than the battledress?
The only thing I can think of is Felon's Coat maybe. Even in my Awakening partial play through I still have Nathaniel using the Battledress.
If there were more good leather armors and if leather armor didn't look so plain then I think I'd use it more often.
Modifié par Iz Stoik zI, 05 octobre 2010 - 07:12 .
#16
Posté 05 octobre 2010 - 07:11
#17
Posté 05 octobre 2010 - 07:55
If a Rogue can Stealth, he can get to the mage and stab him to death. But, if the mage sees the rogue and puts him in a Crushing Prison = dead rogue, unless you have a Templar nearby to cancel it. Warriors also tend to have more Health than rogues and can usually survive a Crushing prison.
While it is true that a 2H Warrior is more durable, a DW Warrior hits more often and has a chance to parry melee attacks and deflect arrows - not as well as a S&S Warrior. The DW Warrior is somewhere in between being full attack (2H) and full defense (S&S).
#18
Posté 06 octobre 2010 - 06:18
Modifié par Commander Mad Cat, 06 octobre 2010 - 06:20 .
#19
Posté 06 octobre 2010 - 07:25
#20
Posté 06 octobre 2010 - 09:08
#21
Posté 06 octobre 2010 - 10:58
Stealth is more fun to me when it is at 3rd or 4th tier, and you sneak in behind your primary target (eg; Mage) and let loose. Then when the opposing troops attempt to surround your position, sneak away to anther location, or not. And the Denerim estates are more fun when Stealthed, IMO.
#22
Posté 06 octobre 2010 - 12:50
Zy-El wrote...
DW Warrior can wear the heavier armor with less stam penalty. DW Warrior also has greater Strength and can dish out more damage without having to flank their targets. Also has access to Champion, Templar, Spirit Warrior specs making them better able to deal with mages who often present Rogues with more challenge.
If a Rogue can Stealth, he can get to the mage and stab him to death. But, if the mage sees the rogue and puts him in a Crushing Prison = dead rogue, unless you have a Templar nearby to cancel it. Warriors also tend to have more Health than rogues and can usually survive a Crushing prison.
I don't think this is at all a fair comparison. My rogue had no trouble with mages at all, simply because I could always just stealth. Mages would generally go for my tank as well until I actually attacked them. Once my rogue started attacking a mage, that was pretty much it for them. Dirty Fighting, Riposte, Punisher, mages seemingly have a harder time resisting them than most and so they never get to retaliate.
I think it's fairly even between DW rogues and warriors in Origins, at least in my mind there isn't a clear winner. But once you get to Awakening, Spirit Warrior is so insanely overpowered that warriors WILL be doing more damage.
Again I am wondering what you mean. How are 2h warriors more durable? They wear the same armor as DW warriors, but DW warriors naturally have higher dexterity and so more defense.While it is true that a 2H Warrior is more durable, a DW Warrior hits more often and has a chance to parry melee attacks and deflect arrows
One last thing. If you're thinking stealth is a bit slow, one of the abilities in Warden's Keep will increase your speed while stealthed. It's a passive buff too so it's pretty great.
Modifié par termokanden, 06 octobre 2010 - 12:52 .
#23
Posté 06 octobre 2010 - 01:21
#24
Posté 06 octobre 2010 - 02:00
#25
Posté 06 octobre 2010 - 03:23
termokanden wrote...
That's one definition of durable.
And it's the only thing I can think of that places 2H Warriors above.





Retour en haut






