Wll DA2 impose bargain bin bras upon female characters?
#76
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 09:05
#77
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 09:53
Galatean wrote...
Sylvius the Mad wrote...
There's already a child lock. It's that big M on the box.ErichHartmann wrote...
Nudity is the best solution or at least a toggle with child lock.
+1
17+ and you have to provide identification.
Funny how it is still not enough.
#78
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 09:58
It is enough.Arrtis wrote...
17+ and you have to provide identification.
Funny how it is still not enough.
I'd like just one example of it not being enough that didn't arise from negligence.
#79
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 10:05
You cannot trust people and many parent likely feel that other parents may not keep a good eye on their kids and expose it to their own kid.
Not every parent wants to tell their kids you cant play with that person or talk to them anymore simply because of what they suspect.
I do agree that currently it is enough but many would disagree.
#80
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 10:08
#81
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 10:32
#82
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 10:33
#83
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 10:36
ziggehunderslash wrote...
I'd prefer strict adherence to the Hays code.
This man speaks wisely.
Suggestive dancing of any kind is just... tacky.
#84
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 10:37
That would remove the Dragon Age from existence.ziggehunderslash wrote...
I'd prefer strict adherence to the Hays code.
#85
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 10:39
Haha, yeah, the moral standards bit would get tricky.Ortaya Alevli wrote...
That would remove the Dragon Age from existence.
Still, in all seriousness I think the best romance bioware ever did was Samara.
#86
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 10:41
#87
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 10:42
Huh?Arrtis wrote...
samara had no romance....
#88
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 10:42
I also think people have a wierd interpretation of the word "romance".Arrtis wrote...
samara had no romance....
#89
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 10:52
Fighting+talking= her saying she is interested in you then says the code take priority...where is the romance>?
Being friendly does not equal romance...
nevermind not DA related.
Modifié par Arrtis, 18 novembre 2010 - 10:53 .
#90
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 10:54
It's right there.Arrtis wrote...
From my understanding is goes like this...
Fighting+talking= her saying she is interested in you then says the code take priority...where is the romance>?
Or perhaps she had to embrace eternity for you to consider what transpired romance?
#91
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 10:55
#92
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 10:56
How about more than friendly chats+fighting.Ortaya Alevli wrote...
It's right there.Arrtis wrote...
From my understanding is goes like this...
Fighting+talking= her saying she is interested in you then says the code take priority...where is the romance>?
Or perhaps she had to embrace eternity for you to consider what transpired romance?
Otherwise you could say you had a romance with jacob and the rest of them...
Friendly relationships do not equal a romance.
#93
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 11:01
I very rarely go to kiss a friend and have them pull away.Arrtis wrote...
From my understanding is goes like this...
Fighting+talking= her saying she is interested in you then says the code take priority...where is the romance>?
Being friendly does not equal romance...
#94
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 11:02
I understand what you mean in theory, but I maintain that this amounts to more than a friendly relationship.Arrtis wrote...
How about more than friendly chats+fighting.
Otherwise you could say you had a romance with jacob and the rest of them...
Friendly relationships do not equal a romance.
#95
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 11:04
#96
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 11:05
#97
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 11:09
Not talking about dating here. Supressed or not, they have feelings for each other that are expressed in one way or another...you know what, never mind. Best not to derail the thread any further.Arrtis wrote...
I say it almost become more than friendly but your denied before it can start.
#98
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 11:10
#99
Guest_----9-----_*
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 11:23
Guest_----9-----_*
outlaworacle wrote...
ziggehunderslash wrote...
I'd prefer strict adherence to the Hays code.
This man speaks wisely.
Suggestive dancing of any kind is just... tacky.
Why keep dragging the Victoria era (pretend) morals into the 21st century? But it's twisted standard when it's permissible to have blood and gore violence, but nudity or the suggestion of sex should be limited. Unless of course, I missed the Chantry codex on nudity standards.
It's a Mature rated game.
#100
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 11:25
Dragon Age knows this and gave us Bloody Sex, Gratuitous Sex scenes after the heat of battle as a little recreation in our enemies blood is the gift the Maker has given us





Retour en haut







