You're kidding, right? I might have a higher opinion of New Vegas were it not a bug-ridden disaster, but I thought Fallout 3 was still the superior game.
I dunno man. Fallout 3 is a lesser game in pretty much every way unless you literally count the "can go everywhere" as a point in its favor (which some people do, which is fine) and that there are more dungeons. What exactly is good about it when putting it against NV? Most people just seem to say "I just liked it more!" which is fine, but that seems more of a nostalgic reaction than anything else.
And like adriano_c points out, it's clearly a departure from what Fallout was about (so is New Vegas by virtue of the engine and the gameplay it brings, but it's much closer the spirit of the older games).
Even as far as the famous bugginess go, I have about an equal amount in Oblivion, F3 and NV and almost all of it has to do with getting stuck in terrain or crashing. NV isn't much different, though it's sad that they have not solved some of the problems in all this time of course.
EDIT: About the radiation, I'm slightly more lenient towards F3 in that case since Fallout radiation is quite obviously really different than "regular" radiation, just look at how it mutates and such.
What I don't like is obviously that your robo-butler can give out Purified Water pretty much left and right (which means the actual technology exists in the world). Obviously, purifying on the scale of Project Purity is a different deal, but it feels more like the developers are wrapping it in a "how to purify water is a mystery!" rather than it being an issue of the scale.
Modifié par Leinadi, 26 décembre 2010 - 10:20 .





Retour en haut





