TheGreyGhost119 wrote...
In my main game, I let Mordin kill him. I do it mostly because I feel this is Mordins choice and not mine to make. It's the same reason I let Miranda kill Niket and Garrus kill Sidonis.
Here I disagree, Mordin and Miranda are not making a choice they're acting on impulse. It's a reflexive reaction and your interuption gives them the opportunity to actually
think about it. If either of them truly wanted to kill those people they would have done so regardless of your intervention. Even Garrus admits (if you ask him just before getting out of the car) that he hasn't really thought this through but he doesn't care. Revenge isn't a choice it's an emotional response and if you force Garrus to actually think about the situation he let's Sidonis go. Had either Mordin, Miranda, or Garrus decided they still wanted their respective targets dead I wouldn't have tried to stop them but I make sure I give them the opportunity to think it through. Zaeed's an example of this he wants to go after Vido and let the workers die, I ask him to think about it, he does and decides he wants Vido dead, so Vido dies.
Edit missed this
Shandepared wrote...
He used it against them, that's basically stealing it.
No at best it's acquiring it under false pretenses. As I mentioned in my example if you give someone something what they choose to do with it does not change the fact you willingly gave it to them.
Modifié par DPSSOC, 17 octobre 2010 - 05:16 .