110 réponses à ce sujet

[Shadow_broker]

thegreateski wrote...

You heard it here folks. Archers cast spells.

They don't have bowstrings
CONFIRMED

[thegreateski]

Shadow_broker wrote...

thegreateski wrote...

You heard it here folks. Archers cast spells.

They don't have bowstrings
CONFIRMED

Ah hell. it was apparent the moment I picked up the Ranger specialization.

Either those animals follow the group around or the Archer summons them with magic. Breaking one of the laws of magic in the process. Friggin Archers.

[Shadow_broker]

thegreateski wrote...

Shadow_broker wrote...

thegreateski wrote...

You heard it here folks. Archers cast spells.

They don't have bowstrings
CONFIRMED

Ah hell. it was apparent the moment I picked up the Ranger specialization.

Either those animals follow the group around or the Archer summons them with magic. Breaking one of the laws of magic in the process. Friggin Archers.

Rules are meant to be broken
disFIRMED

[thegreateski]

disFIRMED?



@#$%, I can't keep up with all these letters.

[Shadow_broker]

thegreateski wrote...

disFIRMED?

@#$%, I can't keep up with all these letters.

Letters cannot move thus you don't need to keep up
Dismissed

[nightcobra]

Shadow_broker wrote...

nightcobra8928 wrote...

i'm thinking a crossbow instead of a hammer

Crossbows are lame
Dismissed

irrelevant 

dismissed

[Shadow_broker]

nightcobra8928 wrote...

Shadow_broker wrote...

nightcobra8928 wrote...

i'm thinking a crossbow instead of a hammer

Crossbows are lame
Dismissed

irrelevant 

dismissed

Injuction filed pending re-relevancy

[Shadow_broker]

Shadow_broker wrote...

nightcobra8928 wrote...

Shadow_broker wrote...

nightcobra8928 wrote...

i'm thinking a crossbow instead of a hammer

Crossbows are lame
Dismissed

irrelevant 

dismissed

Injuction filed pending re-relevancy

Re-Relevancy Confirmed under the law  of lame crossbows of david gaiders early years
"Crossbows are lame and wouldn't make anyone use them"

[Tiax Rules All]

Shadow_broker wrote...

Re-Relevancy Confirmed under the law  of lame crossbows of david gaiders early years
"Crossbows are lame and wouldn't make anyone use them"

Your logic is undeniable.

[Shadow_broker]

Tiax Rules All wrote...

Shadow_broker wrote...

Re-Relevancy Confirmed under the law  of lame crossbows of david gaiders early years
"Crossbows are lame and wouldn't make anyone use them"

Your logic is undeniable.

This statment comes from an unreliable source
Dismissed

[nightcobra]

Shadow_broker wrote...

Tiax Rules All wrote...

Shadow_broker wrote...

Re-Relevancy Confirmed under the law  of lame crossbows of david gaiders early years
"Crossbows are lame and wouldn't make anyone use them"

Your logic is undeniable.

This statment comes from an unreliable source
Dismissed

you're out of order, your post is out of order, this whole thread is out of order!


ps: always wanted to say that:devil:

[Shadow_broker]

nightcobra8928 wrote...

Shadow_broker wrote...

Tiax Rules All wrote...

Shadow_broker wrote...

Re-Relevancy Confirmed under the law  of lame crossbows of david gaiders early years
"Crossbows are lame and wouldn't make anyone use them"

Your logic is undeniable.

This statment comes from an unreliable source
Dismissed

you're out of order, your post is out of order, this whole thread is out of order!


ps: always wanted to say that:devil:

OBJECTION!
HE HAS NO RIGHT TO SAY THAT THAT IS NOT HIS DESCION
THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!

[thegreateski]

nightcobra8928 wrote...

Shadow_broker wrote...

Tiax Rules All wrote...

Shadow_broker wrote...

Re-Relevancy Confirmed under the law  of lame crossbows of david gaiders early years
"Crossbows are lame and wouldn't make anyone use them"

Your logic is undeniable.

This statment comes from an unreliable source
Dismissed

you're out of order, your post is out of order, this whole thread is out of order!


ps: always wanted to say that:devil:

You didn't say it. You typed it.

-Mindscrew-

[nightcobra]

thegreateski wrote...

nightcobra8928 wrote...

Shadow_broker wrote...

Tiax Rules All wrote...

Shadow_broker wrote...

Re-Relevancy Confirmed under the law  of lame crossbows of david gaiders early years
"Crossbows are lame and wouldn't make anyone use them"

Your logic is undeniable.

This statment comes from an unreliable source
Dismissed

you're out of order, your post is out of order, this whole thread is out of order!


ps: always wanted to say that:devil:

You didn't say it. You typed it.

-Mindscrew-

you heard it in your mind:ph34r: mwhahaha....ahem:P

[Shadow_broker]

thegreateski wrote...

nightcobra8928 wrote...

Shadow_broker wrote...

Tiax Rules All wrote...

Shadow_broker wrote...

Re-Relevancy Confirmed under the law  of lame crossbows of david gaiders early years
"Crossbows are lame and wouldn't make anyone use them"

Your logic is undeniable.

This statment comes from an unreliable source
Dismissed

you're out of order, your post is out of order, this whole thread is out of order!


ps: always wanted to say that:devil:

You didn't say it. You typed it.

-Mindscrew-

Possibly melodramatic and said it outloud while typing it,
Dismissed due to lack of evidence

[thegreateski]

nightcobra8928 wrote...

thegreateski wrote...

nightcobra8928 wrote...

Shadow_broker wrote...

Tiax Rules All wrote...

Shadow_broker wrote...

Re-Relevancy Confirmed under the law  of lame crossbows of david gaiders early years
"Crossbows are lame and wouldn't make anyone use them"

Your logic is undeniable.

This statment comes from an unreliable source
Dismissed

you're out of order, your post is out of order, this whole thread is out of order!


ps: always wanted to say that:devil:

You didn't say it. You typed it.

-Mindscrew-

you heard it in your mind:ph34r: mwhahaha....ahem:P

Dismissed. I have no mind.

[Shadow_broker]

thegreateski wrote...

nightcobra8928 wrote...

thegreateski wrote...

nightcobra8928 wrote...

Shadow_broker wrote...

Tiax Rules All wrote...

Shadow_broker wrote...

Re-Relevancy Confirmed under the law  of lame crossbows of david gaiders early years
"Crossbows are lame and wouldn't make anyone use them"

Your logic is undeniable.

This statment comes from an unreliable source
Dismissed

you're out of order, your post is out of order, this whole thread is out of order!


ps: always wanted to say that:devil:

You didn't say it. You typed it.

-Mindscrew-

you heard it in your mind:ph34r: mwhahaha....ahem:P

Dismissed. I have no mind.

Objection!
The Definition of Mind can be debated and is invalid to thread of Fact,
By the Forum act off 2001 9/13 to protect our threads from terrorist it is required this man states the meaning of his debatable subject matter at guantamo bay

[thegreateski]

I'm not a terrorist. I'm a Grammar ****.



and you sir, are going to happy fun time spelling camp.

[Shadow_broker]

thegreateski wrote...

I'm not a terrorist. I'm a Grammar ****.

and you sir, are going to happy fun time spelling camp.

Terroist are capable of Grammar anti Semite behavior
Your still going to guantanmo...Guantamo....This and qwackuemole are the hardest words ever

Also spelling camp does not exsist

[thegreateski]

Guantanmo was shut down and happy fun time spelling camp does exist. We play poker there on Tuesdays.

[Shadow_broker]

thegreateski wrote...

Guantanmo was shut down and happy fun time spelling camp does exist. We play poker there on Tuesdays.

Guantanmo Reinstanfication filed
Spelling Camp has been anhilated along with everyone in it

Modifié par Shadow_broker, 17 octobre 2010 - 10:07 .

[thegreateski]

That's fine but YOU are going to happy fun time spelling camp. Not spelling camp.

[Esbatty]

What is if its a She-He with a box of clothing bits? Ah yeah... just blew your mind. For 6 coppers.

[Shadow_broker]

thegreateski wrote...

That's fine but YOU are going to happy fun time spelling camp. Not spelling camp.

Failing to see what the diffrentation is
No correctionation without representation

[thegreateski]

Esbatty wrote...

What is if its a She-He with a box of clothing bits? Ah yeah... just blew your mind. For 6 coppers.

I demand a happy ending to go with my happy ending.