Shandepared wrote...
wulf3n wrote...
2 things wrong with this anology.
1. if a tiger is so dangerous DON"T provoke it.
2. A tiger is a hunter and can still be dangerous. you have no evidence the geth are dangerous, only your irrational fears.
Wrong. My point with the tiger was that it is inherently dangerous simply because of what it can do to you. This applies with the geth and with any A.I. in fact.
Here I must disagree. Tiger's are dangerous because they're predators, there are plenty of animals capable of far more damage than tigers we deem to be completely harmless. Elephants for example, when an elephant does go on a rampage it is capable of doing a lot of damage and getting a lot of people hurt. However even wild elephants, if left alone, are completely harmless. It's the mentality, that hard wired instinct to hunt and kil, that makes tigers dangerous. So the question is did the Geth possess that kind of dangerous mentality?
Now I agree the Quarians couldn't afford to just sit around and wait to find out, the potential damage the Geth could do was too great if it turned out that yeah they did, but they've had 300 years to look back and think on it and consider if the Geth really were as dangerous as they had thought and they've chosen not to.





Retour en haut




