[quote]achwas wrote...
Oh really - well, in my talk after the horizon mission, she interrupts me, rudely, when I try to point out I may have reasons. Before Shepard even gets to explain said reasons. Than she storms off.
Afterwards writing an apologetic e-mail.[/quote]
Reasons? The only reason your Shepard is able to give on Horizon is that Cerberus is the supposedly only organization trying to stop the Reapers. Which is even more shifty because as you find out TIM more or less orchestrated Horizon.
This is a result of Bioware slipping the idiot ball in the Alliance's pocket so Shepard can be justified working for Cerberus.
[quote]A person you were aware of being ressurected, but did not care about enough to even try to contact. Not that a dead Shepard had much to say about who might be trying to ressurect him/her in the first place.
This is so utterly illogical a reaction by the Virmire survivor,, especially for an allegedly grieving LI, that it is almost funny.[/quote]
They were, in fact, not aware of Shepard being resurrected. Kaidan and Ash state that they heard rumours that Shepard was alive and wanted to believe they were true, which implies that they didn't - no more, no less.
[quote]Another case of broken logic. Shepard is unawre that Cerberus has tweaked the cards by making Horizon an attractive target. But the same is true of the Virmire Survivor. At the time of the talk, and Ashley/Kaiden refusing to listen to Shepard's points regarding cooperation with Cerberus, neither knows any better. So trying to gloss over one's decision with some 20/20 hindsight is just sad. Nevermind that because of Horizon, Shepard actually in the end defeats the collectors, so of course, with Hindsight he/she would be right as well.
In result,, one cannot really play that card to blame Shepard, and of course she (or Kaiden ) doesn't. And even than, it might be argued, that with TIM's tweaking actually the best chance to save some colonists was picked, because of Horizon being trusted with defense technology by the Alliance and with Shepard being send to ambush the Collectors there. Any other, totally random colony would have been a total loss. So, which is actually worse ? If in doubt, settle for the lesser evil.[/quote]
Did you play ME1 and see what Cerberus did? Kaidan and Ash don't need to know about Cerberus orchestrating Horizon in order to be weary, shocked and feeling betrayed by Shepard working with/for them.
[quote]Oh, nevermind, that Ashely/Kaidan could just have retired from active millitary special-ops service or refused this particular mission but instead placed themselves in harm's way.[/quote]
They are marines in a leading position; they can't just refuse a mission for no good reason. And it's more or less their job to "place themselves in harm's way".
[quote]Yeah., as if that has never happened to Ashely/Kaiden before, especially when Shepard is around. A little more trust from one's former team-mates would seem natural.[/quote]
Really? I must have missed it - Shepard died, got resurrected and worked for Cerberus before?
[quote]So Shepard is to blame for being rudely interrupted by her ? Because AFAIK, she (or Kaiden) never asked "please tell my why you work for Cerberus !". Or anything like it. She rather obviously prefers not to disturb her made-up mind. Incidentally furthering the gap between Shepard and the Alliance who obviously would rather not listen to the truth, because the source is unpopular. Nevermind that the Aliiance has it's own shares of out-of-control experiments like the Hannibal V.I.... reminds me of the old saying concerning motes in other people's eyes...
Which is... bigoted, because she of course demeands understanding and endorsement of her point of view, without even deigning to consider Shepards at all. And when Shepard call's her on it with "you are treacting too emotional" there is not a second of reflection, just defensive persistence. That's the narrow-minded attitudes that has caused far too many wars in the last five centuries in an age, where, due to the advance of reason, humanity should have known better.
And you really wonder why one would dislike her ?[/quote]
First off, it's Kaidan. With an "a". Secondly, the Hannibal VI wasn't an experiment, it was a VI that had gone rogue on an Alliance training ground.
So Shepard gets to call Ash/Kaidan out on being "emotional", which they have every right to be after seeing their friend/lover after two years of believing him/her dead, but they don't get to call Shepard out on working with one of the enemies in ME1, Cerberus?
[quote]Ahh, I see, if the council ignores Sheparad's reasoning everyone agrees they are deluded fools, not worth saving (but sometimes saved nevertheless) or even to be taken serious.
If Ashely Williams does not listen, she is "entitled to her view", and there being not a single reson to dislike her....
[/quote]
You compare two very different things that can't be compared. The Council glosses over the fact that Reapers exist; Ash/Kaidan is simply calling Shepard out on working with Cerberus and consequently refusing to join him/her.
[quote]Yes, she is an utter hippocrite.
She has known and served close to Shepard for the entirity of ME-1. She, and her view of Aliens, the galaxy and assessment of situations are repeatedly proven wrong throughout ME-1. By Shepard.
So it is the same Shepard, who now claims that - while not endorsing Cerebrus Message of human pre-dominance to be right - Cerberus warnings about the Reaper threat not being over and Cerberus due to the Alliance's powermongering being the sole available, if unlikely ally at the moment, I do expect from an old friend and former comrade-in-arms that she will actually listen to my reasoning.
If she has factual objections, they will be heard and considered . But I expect the same privilege the other way round.
Ashely is unwilling to consent to this, much as the council, who ignores any unpopular findings from the missions they send Shepard on.[/quote]
As I wrote before: you can attribute that to Bioware's railroading. If they kept both Ash and Shepard in character, they would have talked. They owe each other at least that much.
[quote]Her personel file is highly classified, so she is far from a "simple soldier" anymore. I 'd rather suepct her being a human spectre, or at least getting groomed for that role. Hence she would have inside access and information, and in all likelihood be close to either Anderson and/or Admiral Hackett. She is after all the right hand woman of the legendar late Commander Shepard.
Anderson knows, and as the LotSB files reveal, so does Admrial hackett and other branches of the Alliance millitary.It is hard to believe that noone contacted her or even interviewed her on her take of Shepard now working for Cerberus. I also seem to remember that she claims "she didn't believe the rumours to be true", but would have to check... but implying she heard of it. She obviously did not think it feasible to drop Liara a call either, who could have explained wide parts of the situation at the rop of a hat ?[/quote]
She also says that Anderson "stone-walled" her, if you recall. It isn't as easy as you make it out to be.
[quote]hmm, the emails from Shepards mother reach him/her quite fine trhough the interweb ? Surely Ashley should be be able of the same effort ? And talking to Anderson only confirms my point f her knowing but not caring enough[/quote]
See above - she didn't know you were alive. After Horizon, she does write you a message. And what point about talking to Anderson confirmed which one of your points?
[quote]Same for Liara. Totally different, much more reasoned reaction. Same for Tali, with even better reason to hate you. Much more nuanced and thoughtful reaction. Chakwas ? Even quit alliance service and applied with cerberus on the off-chance Lazarus would succeed.[/quote]
Liara had access to information, Kaidan or Ashley never had. Tali has completed her missions and is free to go with you if she chose to. And lastly, Chakwas couldn't stand the life on a ground military station and decided to join Cerberus.
It is unfair to compare the situations of so vastly different characters who are in very different situations.
[quote]So much for friendship and/or even love. Totally wimpy reaction, especially after not even listenming to Shepard but condemning wholesale and on circumstantial evidence.
To my mind, the sort of "fair-weather-only" friendship (and My shepard) can very well do without.[/quote]
Ash/Kaidan doesn't condemn Shepard to anything. She simply stands up for her/his beliefs and decides to not join Shepard because of more than circumstantial evidence. Shepard
is working with Cerberus, s/he can even admit it - there's nothing cicumstanstial about it.
[quote]The entire "arch-enemy" talk is so much empty air and bogus talks in the context of ME-2 , when you can actually dock in Alliance controlled or allied space and not even be hassled by security. When you can actually walk up to the Aliiance Counsel and talk to him, with known Cereberus agents at your side, without any hassle, questions raised or even security queries. It really makes you wonder about some of that PR-spin on alleged Cerberus activities and "responsibility" in ME-1.
I will not indulge in the Alliance + Cerberus conspiracy theories on these forums, but they certainly bear some consideration. At least the conflict betwwen Blood Pact, Eclipse and Blue Suns seemed far more intense and real than Alliance prosecution of Cerberus crimes and activity.
Nevermind that even the Turians, Batarians, Volus, Aasari and Salarians seem to have no qualms talkingto agents of that "anti-Alien, pro-Humanity" organisation.[/quote]
You have to see ME2 in context with ME1 - it isn't called a trilogy for nothing. You can't put the blame of the things you've listed on Ash and Kaidan. They don't control the Alliance and aren't personally responsible for their actions.
Alleged? Once again, did you even play ME1 and did all the Cerberus related missions?
[quote]Garrus could have walked away or decided to quit from the moment he woke up. Tali only joined after horizon, because on Freedom's Progress he had a mission to finish and would not serve two masters at once. Neither delayed because they distrusted your judgement or because Cerberus agents accompanied you.
*shrug*[/quote]
And where would he have gone after quitting? Garrus doesn't really have anywhere to go.
[quote]Both have bigger fish to fry. Wrex tries to save the Korgan species, which is a lifetime undertaking. Liara is hunting down the Shadowbroker, as we know since the LotSB DLC, to save her friend Feron. BTW, a good example of true and loyal friendship, ashely might want to take notes..
And after LotSB, she too has a larger job to fill than just serve as a squaddie on the SR-2. I'd rather have her controlling the SB network, than as my LI on the Normandy. Especially as it means she is rather safely out of the line of fire.
Ashley on the other hand is still a commando, and not in charge of any number of soldiers or civillians with their lives depending on her staying with them. She might even help the Alliance by gaining valuable inside information of Cerberus by joining up with Shepard, or at least keeping track of the Cerberus effort. Seeing Admiral Hackett and/or Counsellor Anderson agree to this line of reasoning is not a major leap of faith. But she... does not.[/quote]
And who says Ash and Kaidan don't have a "bigger fish to fry"? We don't know what they are doing after Horizon. They might have their own agenda that we know nothing about.
And why should they take that leap of faith? Shepard turns up on Horion after being dead for two years, going "How've you been? I'm working with Cerberus." - for all they knew, Shepard could have been a Cerberus agent all along or even a clone. All those options are more likely than Shepard being resurrected. Even moreso if s/he's the only person so far that we know got resurrected. It's a bit of a stretch to believe that.
You are also contradicting yourself. You just wrote that her file is highly classified and therefore she could be more than a simple soldier.
Modifié par Chignon, 02 novembre 2010 - 06:31 .