Tamyn wrote...
And Carver can survive! Yay! I wonder if it's a choice between him and Bethany surviving.
I wonder if this means FemHawke+Carver wincest if we choose him over Bethany.
Tamyn wrote...
And Carver can survive! Yay! I wonder if it's a choice between him and Bethany surviving.
Modifié par indio, 29 octobre 2010 - 11:26 .
Guest_Blasto the jelly_*
indio wrote...
Wow...is it just me (I haven't read the thread), but the hip wiggle on Hawke is excessive, no? Catwalk model, saviour, or both?
The demographic of this game, sadly, is no longer me.
Dr. wonderful wrote...
And the Demographic being...what?
chex mix wrote...
Harid wrote...
There wasn't a real. . .primary love interest in DA:O, why do people assume Isabela is going to be the primary love interest anyway?
Leliana's romance was nothing compared to morrigan's. Morrigan was a poster child of DAO and most males romanced her
Upsettingshorts wrote...
Dr. wonderful wrote...
And the Demographic being...what?
People who didn't notice. So, basically everybody.
Blasto the jelly wrote...
Did anyone find it weird they realesed a new trailer and we still have'nt seen any Elves yet (This being said by a Elf fanboy)
BTW this trailer makes me want to sleep untill March because i want this game so much.
Modifié par kwintessa, 30 octobre 2010 - 06:28 .
David Gaider wrote...
the_one_54321 wrote...
So it's like the romance/friendship thing except in reverse? That sound AWESOME!!shepard_lives wrote...
You can be a complete **** to your companions and get bonuses and new dialogue for it.
Essentially what it boils down to is this: in Origins if you didn't get along with a companion you got nothing. No dialogue, no interaction and no gameplay benefits. So what we've done is added a "rivalry path" which is the friendship path in reverse. As approval goes down you get interactions where you argue with the companion, and this is the path where you could ultimately convince them they need to change.
Thus taking a stance with a companion that is argumentative is a legitimate way to develop your relationship with them, and there's no need to hunt for the approval bonuses in every instance.
Taritu wrote...
David Gaider wrote...
the_one_54321 wrote...
So it's like the romance/friendship thing except in reverse? That sound AWESOME!!shepard_lives wrote...
You can be a complete **** to your companions and get bonuses and new dialogue for it.
Essentially what it boils down to is this: in Origins if you didn't get along with a companion you got nothing. No dialogue, no interaction and no gameplay benefits. So what we've done is added a "rivalry path" which is the friendship path in reverse. As approval goes down you get interactions where you argue with the companion, and this is the path where you could ultimately convince them they need to change.
Thus taking a stance with a companion that is argumentative is a legitimate way to develop your relationship with them, and there's no need to hunt for the approval bonuses in every instance.
Oh, thank God. Kissing Morrigan's butt (or distracting her with shinies) got real tired, real fast, so I just sidelined her on most playthroughs.
slimgrin wrote...
Taritu wrote...
David Gaider wrote...
the_one_54321 wrote...
So it's like the romance/friendship thing except in reverse? That sound AWESOME!!shepard_lives wrote...
You can be a complete **** to your companions and get bonuses and new dialogue for it.
Essentially what it boils down to is this: in Origins if you didn't get along with a companion you got nothing. No dialogue, no interaction and no gameplay benefits. So what we've done is added a "rivalry path" which is the friendship path in reverse. As approval goes down you get interactions where you argue with the companion, and this is the path where you could ultimately convince them they need to change.
Thus taking a stance with a companion that is argumentative is a legitimate way to develop your relationship with them, and there's no need to hunt for the approval bonuses in every instance.
Oh, thank God. Kissing Morrigan's butt (or distracting her with shinies) got real tired, real fast, so I just sidelined her on most playthroughs.
Tell me about it. One wrong choice and your standing with her plummeted. She really came across like a snooty b*tch at times.
Leliana's romance was just as fleshed out as Morrigan's. The DR doesn't change that, either.chex mix wrote...
Harid wrote...
There wasn't a real. . .primary love interest in DA:O, why do people assume Isabela is going to be the primary love interest anyway?
Leliana's romance was nothing compared to morrigan's. Morrigan was a poster child of DAO and most males romanced her
Anarya wrote...
Isabela!