filaminstrel wrote...
Salma Hayek seems to be the most fitting comparison.
Agreed.
filaminstrel wrote...
Salma Hayek seems to be the most fitting comparison.
aznsoisauce wrote...
But wait! There's more!Dave of Canada wrote...
I've not facepalmed this hard in years.
Thank you, Isabela thread.
I had some fun with that celebrity face double website.
I feel a bit old remembering when Cindy Crawford was considered the most beautiful woman on the planet.
I was getting results like Tricia Helfer, Angelina Jolie, Leelee Sobieski, and Kiera Knightley -- although, Kiera's face is pretty man-ish.
Then again...
TonyTheBossDanza123 wrote...
the_one_54321 wrote...
I think that individualized body and clothing designs far outshines the benefits of customizable armor. We had customizable armor in DA:O and what it amounted to was a lot of really boring looks that were copy-paste of all the other really boring looks on the characters that had bodies that were copy-pase of the identical bodies other characters had. What's there to customize? Where's the flair? It was boring. It was customizable and all that meant was that everyone had to be the same.Helekanalaith wrote...
Opinions differ. I prefer the character-styled appearances, as seen in ME2, over the generic Joe Smoe outfits any time.CoS Sarah Jinstar wrote...
Swear to all that is holy if they pull that "unique companion clothing" bs they pulled with ME2 I'll cancle my preorder and not even bother til its 10 bucks used.Brockololly wrote...
My only concern in seeing characters so individualized is that I wonder how the armor will work with companions. They've said we'll have an inventory and all, but well, technically we had an inventory in ME2 as well.
This is an RPG. A core part of an RPG is that you have customization. You want to play a character with a set style, go play an adventure game like Assassins Creed or Prince of Persia.
_purifico_ wrote...
These are just random pictures of random women, right? Because Isabela looks nothing like Cindy or Kate.
I don't mention the differences in the appearance of the darkspawn or qunari because I can see valid reasons for those changes (or at least understandable reasoning). I just don't see the purpose of radically changing the physical appearance of a character from one game to the next just because '[we] can'. That's all. No anxiety here, just honest confusion.David Gaider wrote...
TS2Aggie wrote...
. . . "Anxiety"? The only thing I expressed a desire for was continuity in a game that I expect I will probably enjoy; I don't really think that merits being belittled by you.
I'm not belittling you. I do think making numerous posts expressing "concern" over something to be anxiety, however, sure. You asked politely and I answered your questions... and insofar as people being concerned about visual continuity from DAO to DA2 all I meant is there are MUCH bigger changes (see the darkspawn, for instance, or the qunari) so I'm not sure why someone would be point out Isabela specifically, as if we weren't already overhauling the looks of things across the board. That's it.
Modifié par TS2Aggie, 27 octobre 2010 - 09:27 .
David Gaider wrote...
dan107 wrote...
Well why not just try it once and see how it goes? I honestly think you would get a lot fewer people calling her ugly. Maybe she won't be the hottest thing in the world to everyone, but she'll be attractive enough to almost every heterosexual male.
Sounds like she'd hit your preferences, sure.
I'm not sure why we would do that, however, except to supposedly calm the people who are calling Isabela ugly. Which I already told you they would do anyhow, no matter how Victoria-esque she looked, because that's what people do-- especially to models.
So I think we're okay with making our characters look interesting, rather than striving for some perfection to appease people who are mostly complaining about nothing anyhow. And I'll leave it at that, sorry.
ElvaliaRavenHart wrote...
I thought the old Isabela was right down ugly
I liked Morrigan's look in the Sacred Ashes trailer and preferred that one. But I prefer DA:O's rendering of Leliana to Sacred Ashes'. In Sacred Ashes she looks a little too young.aaniadyen wrote...
I think she's pretty, she is suffering from a case of man jaw, but then again, Morrigan did too in the Sacred ashes trailer and look how she turned out.
and her hair looked too fake.Collider wrote...
I liked Morrigan's look in the Sacred Ashes trailer and preferred that one. But I prefer DA:O's rendering of Leliana to Sacred Ashes'. In Sacred Ashes she looks a little too young.aaniadyen wrote...
I think she's pretty, she is suffering from a case of man jaw, but then again, Morrigan did too in the Sacred ashes trailer and look how she turned out.
Collider wrote...
I liked Morrigan's look in the Sacred Ashes trailer and preferred that one. But I prefer DA:O's rendering of Leliana to Sacred Ashes'. In Sacred Ashes she looks a little too young.aaniadyen wrote...
I think she's pretty, she is suffering from a case of man jaw, but then again, Morrigan did too in the Sacred ashes trailer and look how she turned out.
Modifié par TMcGee92127, 27 octobre 2010 - 10:27 .
TMcGee92127 wrote...
However, you have pulled only one character from DAO into DA2, one that everyone knows well, and completely changed it..
Golden-Rose wrote...
TMcGee92127 wrote...
However, you have pulled only one character from DAO into DA2, one that everyone knows well, and completely changed it..
Have you forgotten about Flemeth?
ShrinkingFish wrote...
Golden-Rose wrote...
TMcGee92127 wrote...
However, you have pulled only one character from DAO into DA2, one that everyone knows well, and completely changed it..
Have you forgotten about Flemeth?
Everyone forgot about Flemeth...
TMcGee92127 wrote...
... Her mouth is way too small ...
Golden-Rose wrote...
TMcGee92127 wrote...
However, you have pulled only one character from DAO into DA2, one that everyone knows well, and completely changed it..
Have you forgotten about Flemeth?