472 réponses à ce sujet

[Onyx Jaguar]

I'll wait and see the reaction when Bioware decides to do an episodic game



"It's like Shareware except you have to pay for the first episode"

[Dave of Canada]

Goddess Of Boobs wrote...

@Dave where was this said?

Here.

Cerberus Network 2.0, meaning that the companion is probably Zaeed 2.0 and will come through it.

[Onyx Jaguar]

It only really screws over those without an internet connection, but I find it curious that the ones that are most up in arms for them it really shouldn't be an issue.

[Wicked 702]

AdamNW wrote...

Goddess, I already told you that the DLC character is NOT exclusive.

And your source for this information is....? Aliens? A diety?

[JrayM16]

Onyx Jaguar wrote...

It only really screws over those without an internet connection, but I find it curious that the ones that are most up in arms for them it really shouldn't be an issue.

Well if people without internet connections would be most affected by it then they can't get on this foum and thus can't get up in arms.

[Onyx Jaguar]

It would be a massive waste of resources to waste a DLC character on an edition of a game that is discounted primarily to guarantee sales.

[Dave of Canada]

JrayM16 wrote...

Onyx Jaguar wrote...

It only really screws over those without an internet connection, but I find it curious that the ones that are most up in arms for them it really shouldn't be an issue.

Well if people without internet connections would be most affected by it then they can't get on this foum and thus can't get up in arms.

They don't even know they're supposed to be angry.

[Onyx Jaguar]

JrayM16 wrote...

Onyx Jaguar wrote...

It only really screws over those without an internet connection, but I find it curious that the ones that are most up in arms for them it really shouldn't be an issue.

Well if people without internet connections would be most affected by it then they can't get on this foum and thus can't get up in arms.

Its like those poor bastards who played Donkey Kong on the NES without knowing about the Arcade version

[Lord_Valandil]

Onyx Jaguar wrote...

It would be a massive waste of resources to waste a DLC character on an edition of a game that is discounted primarily to guarantee sales.

Certainly. That's why I kept insisting to Goddess that the character isn't going to be exclusive to the SE.

[Wicked 702]

JrayM16 wrote...

Goddess Of Boobs wrote...

@Dave where was this said?
@Jray How do you know
@Rinp BECAUSE I HAVEN'T SEEN WHAT THE  DAMN GAME IS ALL ABOUT YET.

How do YOU know I'm wrong? 

Logical Fallacy. Arguing from Ignorance.

www.logicalfallacies.info/presumption/arguing-from-ignorance/

[Onyx Jaguar]

Oh ****! This place is getting Schizoid!

[JrayM16]

Wicked 702 wrote...

JrayM16 wrote...

Goddess Of Boobs wrote...

@Dave where was this said?
@Jray How do you know
@Rinp BECAUSE I HAVEN'T SEEN WHAT THE  DAMN GAME IS ALL ABOUT YET.

How do YOU know I'm wrong? 

Logical Fallacy. Arguing from Ignorance.

www.logicalfallacies.info/presumption/arguing-from-ignorance/

Well, when I said that I was more pointing out Goddess's own lgical fallacy.  Bioware has stated that this is so.  But wait, I know that's ad hominem, another fallacy.  Neither Goddess nor I had a stable argumentative basis.

Edit:  Sorry, I meant appeal to authority.

Modifié par JrayM16, 29 octobre 2010 - 12:09 .

[Wicked 702]

Not exactly. Ad hominem is simply when you dismiss someone's argument by personal insult.

Example: You can't possibly be right about "insert technical issue here" because you aren't good at playing the game. Being good at a game doesn't work towards or against one's ability to spot a technical issue.

At this point, I may be arguing a lie though. Has Bioware confirmed, in any way, that the SE "character" will be buyable or available in some other way? I don't think that's the case.

Edit: Ok, saw edit. Gotcha.

Hey Bioware, just promise me you'll have LESS bugs in this one and I'll stop harping this point. Pretty please?

Modifié par Wicked 702, 29 octobre 2010 - 12:13 .

[AdamNW]

Wicked 702 wrote...

AdamNW wrote...

Goddess, I already told you that the DLC character is NOT exclusive.

And your source for this information is....? Aliens? A diety?

The fact that the list of bonuses from pre-order specifically mentions only one exclusive feature.

Hint: It's not the character.

Modifié par AdamNW, 29 octobre 2010 - 12:15 .

[Onyx Jaguar]

Considering the Dev cycle I would expect it to be just as buggy. Unless they figures out the engine.



...which is one they made

[JrayM16]

Wicked 702 wrote...

Not exactly. Ad hominem is simply when you dismiss someone's argument by personal insult.

Example: You can't possibly be right about "insert technical issue here" because you aren't good at playing the game. Being good at a game doesn't work towards or against one's ability to spot a technical issue.

At this point, I may be arguing a lie though. Has Bioware confirmed, in any way, that the SE "character" will be buyable or available in some other way? I don't think that's the case.

Well, I did edit my post to change it to appeal to authority.

On another note, I was looking through the fallacies site(it's been a few years since my course in argument) and I realized that basically everything on this forum applies to logical fallacy.  Now I'm all depressed.

[Wicked 702]

I know, it's a rhetorical question kinda...



Sigh.

[Wicked 702]

JrayM16 wrote...

Wicked 702 wrote...

Not exactly. Ad hominem is simply when you dismiss someone's argument by personal insult.

Example: You can't possibly be right about "insert technical issue here" because you aren't good at playing the game. Being good at a game doesn't work towards or against one's ability to spot a technical issue.

At this point, I may be arguing a lie though. Has Bioware confirmed, in any way, that the SE "character" will be buyable or available in some other way? I don't think that's the case.

Well, I did edit my post to change it to appeal to authority.

On another note, I was looking through the fallacies site(it's been a few years since my course in argument) and I realized that basically everything on this forum applies to logical fallacy.  Now I'm all depressed.

Yeah, I saw your edit and edited my own. Now my brain hurts.

Logical Fallacies for ALL!

[Lord_Valandil]

Onyx Jaguar wrote...

Considering the Dev cycle I would expect it to be just as buggy. Unless they figures out the engine.

...which is one they made

LOL!

[NKKKK]

Onyx Jaguar wrote...

Considering the Dev cycle I would expect it to be just as buggy. Unless they figures out the engine.

...which is one they made

Win

[upsettingshorts]

Arguments containing fallacies can still reach correct conclusions!

It's a fallacy fallacy to claim otherwise!

/throws wrench into discussion

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 29 octobre 2010 - 01:12 .