The Official Isabela Discussion thread 2.0 **VA: Victoria Kruger**
#6726
Posté 30 septembre 2012 - 12:02
#6727
Posté 01 octobre 2012 - 11:04
Alexandrine Delassixe wrote...
Have you tried groups dedicated to Isabela?
I've tried, but there are almost 4000 groups to go through. Under categories, there is DA Builders, and Dragon Age Origins, but nothing DA2 related. I even googled DA2 Isabela banners. I found a couple on deviant art.
My sig is good enough for now.
#6728
Posté 02 octobre 2012 - 11:38
#6729
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 08:23
Fleshdress wrote...
Plus as you add banners they mostly get cut off... I wonder if you could find a small one like my feather!Fenris.
Yeah, i wish they gave us more sig space. I do have a little Izzy banner, it's on the bottom left of my signature.
#6730
Posté 11 octobre 2012 - 10:05
#6731
Posté 11 octobre 2012 - 04:33
#6732
Posté 11 octobre 2012 - 04:42
Honestly, I don't think it matters which gender you romance her with. It's a lot of fun either way. I don't remember any differences between the male and female romances, but as I said, I've only finished it once.
#6733
Posté 11 octobre 2012 - 10:41
I was thinking maybe nightshade or some type of lily?
#6734
Posté 11 octobre 2012 - 10:49
#6735
Posté 11 octobre 2012 - 11:08
#6736
Posté 12 octobre 2012 - 03:01
#6737
Posté 15 octobre 2012 - 06:53
#6738
Posté 21 octobre 2012 - 04:17




Modifié par MrFlipFlops, 21 octobre 2012 - 04:18 .
#6739
Posté 23 octobre 2012 - 10:12
#6740
Posté 23 octobre 2012 - 08:07
One year after the battle of Kirkwall she is sailing with Alistair and Varric in the Silent Grove.
#6741
Posté 24 octobre 2012 - 01:19
I think for the sake of the comic books, and the need to have flexibility with each player's handling of Hawke, no romance is mentioned. I would imagine though, that Isabela has every intention of returning to the Champion's side after that particular adventure.Apophis2412 wrote...
Have Hawke and Isabella seperated after DA2?
One year after the battle of Kirkwall she is sailing with Alistair and Varric in the Silent Grove.
#6742
Posté 24 octobre 2012 - 01:34
Instead, Alistair acts like this. Varric is muted, he barely speaks except to provide exposition to the reader. And Isabela? Isabela's turned from a strong, confident woman who's coda was "Our mistakes make us who we are" and "They don't know me, I know me" into a broken bird who's plagued by guilt and who doesn't believe she can find redemption.
It's a travesty.
#6743
Guest_Rojahar_*
Posté 24 octobre 2012 - 01:41
Guest_Rojahar_*
hoorayforicecream wrote...
I really dislike the comics. They started off kind of bad, and they've just gotten worse. The characters just... don't behave like I expect of them.
...
It's a travesty.
But Alistair and Isabela can be those ways in the games. They just weren't in your playthroughs. Its not like they can write the comic for every possible variant playthrough. Besides, they've said people can just think of it as an alternate reality. Certainly not worth damning Bioware over or calling a "travesty".
Modifié par Rojahar, 24 octobre 2012 - 01:42 .
#6744
Posté 24 octobre 2012 - 01:49
#6745
Posté 24 octobre 2012 - 01:50
Rojahar wrote...
hoorayforicecream wrote...
I really dislike the comics. They started off kind of bad, and they've just gotten worse. The characters just... don't behave like I expect of them.
...
It's a travesty.
But Alistair and Isabela can be those ways in the games. They just weren't in your playthroughs. Its not like they can write the comic for every possible variant playthrough. Besides, they've said people can just think of it as an alternate reality. Certainly not worth damning Bioware over or calling a "travesty".
The only way this would ever happen is if the player purposely ignores and doesn't bring any of the three characters along during gameplay. You cannot change them to act that way in the game, you can only enforce the absence of these qualities by not seeing them at all. And even if you did behave that way, it wouldn't matter because the player cannot fundamentally change who these characters are, they can only affect them through the way they act toward them.
And even beyond that, it's incredibly stupid to make them the headliner characters in a comic. There's very little reason for anyone who isn't at least familiar with them to bother with the comic, which leads me to believe that they are targeting fans of said characters with these comics.
It seems counterintuitive to make a comic that targets fans of a character that doesn't present a consistent personality with the character's previous appearance. I liked these characters because of who they were in the games. The characters present in the comics do not act like any version of the characters in the game, except possibly the "had very little screen time" versions. And that makes no sense, because who in their right mind would be interested in paying for a comic about 3 characters they never played with?
Edit: I'm not damning Bioware. I'm damning the writing, the art, and the production of these shabby comics. I don't hold Bioware responsible for a Dark Horse product. I'm holding Dark Horse (and perhaps Gaider) responsible.
Modifié par hoorayforicecream, 24 octobre 2012 - 01:52 .
#6746
Guest_Rojahar_*
Posté 24 octobre 2012 - 01:57
Guest_Rojahar_*
hoorayforicecream wrote...
Rojahar wrote...
hoorayforicecream wrote...
I really dislike the comics. They started off kind of bad, and they've just gotten worse. The characters just... don't behave like I expect of them.
...
It's a travesty.
But Alistair and Isabela can be those ways in the games. They just weren't in your playthroughs. Its not like they can write the comic for every possible variant playthrough. Besides, they've said people can just think of it as an alternate reality. Certainly not worth damning Bioware over or calling a "travesty".
The only way this would ever happen is if the player purposely ignores and doesn't bring any of the three characters along during gameplay. You cannot change them to act that way in the game, you can only enforce the absence of these qualities by not seeing them at all. And even if you did behave that way, it wouldn't matter because the player cannot fundamentally change who these characters are, they can only affect them through the way they act toward them.
And even beyond that, it's incredibly stupid to make them the headliner characters in a comic. There's very little reason for anyone who isn't at least familiar with them to bother with the comic, which leads me to believe that they are targeting fans of said characters with these comics.
It seems counterintuitive to make a comic that targets fans of a character that doesn't present a consistent personality with the character's previous appearance. I liked these characters because of who they were in the games. The characters present in the comics do not act like any version of the characters in the game, except possibly the "had very little screen time" versions. And that makes no sense, because who in their right mind would be interested in paying for a comic about 3 characters they never played with?
Edit: I'm not damning Bioware. I'm damning the writing, the art, and the production of these shabby comics. I don't hold Bioware responsible for a Dark Horse product. I'm holding Dark Horse (and perhaps Gaider) responsible.
I've done a DAO playthrough where Alistair was an extreme brooding and confrontational person. Completely miserable to be around. I dragged him with me everywhere I went, too, but kept him at max disapproval. Rivalmancing Isabela, I ended up with someone who wasn't "proud of who she was" but rather was seeking to be the kind of person Hawke wanted her to be, in the end. I dragged her with that Hawke everywhere too. It's an ignorant assumption that anyone who's a fan of the characters would have played the way you did, or not have played with them at all and didn't like the characters.
To say Bioware is committing a travesty and its bad writing just because it's not the way you liked the characters is no different than those who say Merrill and Anders were terribly written and shouldn't have existed in DA2 because of the differences from their portrayal in DAO. I don't think its worth being so venomous and hateful because the comic portrays sides of the characters which you never bothered to explore.
Modifié par Rojahar, 24 octobre 2012 - 02:11 .
#6747
Posté 24 octobre 2012 - 02:19
#6748
Posté 24 octobre 2012 - 02:27
Rojahar wrote...
I've done a DAO playthrough where Alistair was an extreme brooding and confrontational person. Completely miserable to be around. I dragged him with me everywhere I went, too, but kept him at max disapproval. Rivalmancing Isabela, I ended up with someone who wasn't "proud of who she was" but rather was seeking to be the kind of person Hawke wanted her to be, in the end. I dragged her with that Hawke everywhere too. It's an ignorant assumption that anyone who's a fan of the characters would have played the way you did, or not have played with them at all and didn't like the characters.
I guess you must have kept Merrill, Varric, and Aveline out of your party as well, or just pretended that any banter didn't happen.
But maybe you're right. Maybe the comics aren't for me. Maybe they are just written from the idea that the character is just different than I thought. How is that any less of a travesty to me? How am I not allowed to complain about a grievance I find to be legitimate? I was gravely disappointed by these comics. I did not like them, because they did not match my expectations.
Look around, especially at the hundreds and hundreds of pages of discussion in this thread and Varric's and Alistair's. I think I missed all of Alistair's fans who love his brooding, angsting, and grimdark. I missed the posts which were expressing their joy and affirmation that Isabela's was really just seeking redemption all along, and not the confident, self-assured woman she told Merrill and Aveline she was. I missed the posts in the Varric thread where fan after fan agreed that they loved it when he shut up and only gave exposition.
This is one place where the self-selection bias is actually important. We're the hardest of the hard core fans. We're the ones who care the most about these characters. And we're the ones who are most likely to buy these comics, because they are video game tie-in with three specific featured characters that we like the most.
I can't speak for everyone, but I can speak for myself. And I stand by what I said, but I'll amend it just for you. These comics are a travesty for me. I would not recommend them to anyone who enjoys any of the content in any of the character-specific fan threads.
To say Bioware is committing a travesty and its bad writing just because it's not the way you liked the characters is no different than those who say Merrill and Anders were terribly written and shouldn't have existed in DA2 because of the differences from their portrayal in DAO.hoorayforicecream wrote...
Edit: I'm not damning Bioware. I'm damning the writing, the art, and the production of these shabby comics. I don't hold Bioware responsible for a Dark Horse product. I'm holding Dark Horse (and perhaps Gaider) responsible.
Somebody needs to work on his reading comprehension. Or at least stop putting words in my mouth. I've got enough of my own, thanks.
#6749
Guest_Rojahar_*
Posté 24 octobre 2012 - 02:51
Guest_Rojahar_*
There will always be lots of people complaining, no matter what they choose to do. There's lots of people who claim Dragon Age 2 ruined Dragon Age and the characters over things like Anders' personality developing in a different direction than they were accustomed, perceived sexual orientations, etc.
You're certainly welcome to your opinion, but again, its my opinion that its not worth damning David Gaider or Dark Horse over. This kind of thing happens all the time. At least they portrayed the characters as they were in some people's playthroughs. There are plenty of people of loved rivalry paths and call themselves the "true" fans.
Everyone, even people with completely opposite beliefs, seems to call themselves the true hard core fans who Bioware should write for specifically, and claim the other as a minority who shouldn't be represented. I think that's unfortunate, but that's just my opinion.
Personal attacks are out of line though. You said you were upset the characters didn't act as you expected, which I quoted above. I'm not trying to silence you, but explaining, there were more aspects to the characters you could explore through adversarial playthroughs, and so its no betrayal of the characters by David Gaider, but rather just seeing a side you never nurtured and don't enjoy, but very much existed.
#6750
Posté 24 octobre 2012 - 02:53





Retour en haut





