dan108 wrote...
At any rate, I'm off to enjoy my ban, if I offended anyone, it honestly was not my intention. Take that for what it's worth.
yukidama wrote...
(EDIT: Not passing any judgements, just saying you can have sex pretty early on in the timeline.)
Pacifien wrote...
I'm going with Mal/Han influence with Inara's sexually liberated attitude.
Lord_Valandil wrote...
dan108 wrote...
At any rate, I'm off to enjoy my ban, if I offended anyone, it honestly was not my intention. Take that for what it's worth.
Heh. Don't play victim now, the ban was deserved.
Take some time to think about it before you return with more mysoginistic goodness.
yukidama wrote...
For Morrigan sleeping with the Warden the first time I don't necessarily think that's true. It depends more on how early or late in the game you choose to follow through with this, but you can do it pretty early when way less than 2 months should have passed.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 28 octobre 2010 - 08:39 .
yukidama wrote...
Maconbar wrote...
Pacifien wrote...
5 minutes gametime. Did you want to sit there for four hours buying her drinks and getting to know her better before the option came up? There were darkspawn needed killing, man. Can't keep a game stuck at the Pearl forever just so it could adequately portray foreplay.dan107 wrote...
Charming or not -- 3 strangers after a 5 minute conversation? That says something about her. Not every, and I would wager hardly any, woman can be persuaded to something like that that quickly unless she's looking for it herself. Regardless of how charming the guy is.
Thank you for pointing this out. It is also relevant to romancing the other companions. In DA:O our actions probably covered 6 months to 1 year as I recall. If that is correct then Morrigan probably doesn't sleep with the warden until she has known him for two months give or take. They have spent a substantial portion of that time together. So the warden and Morrigan starting a romantic relationship isn't necessarily an indication of promiscuity.
I wonder if Varric will discuss Hawke's relationships as part of the framed narrative. It would be funny to see those exaggerated events.
For Morrigan sleeping with the Warden the first time I don't necessarily think that's true. It depends more on how early or late in the game you choose to follow through with this, but you can do it pretty early when way less than 2 months should have passed.
(EDIT: Not passing any judgements, just saying you can have sex pretty early on in the timeline.)
dan108 wrote...
Alright, so my prior incarnation got banned...
yukidama wrote...
Maconbar wrote...
Pacifien wrote...
5 minutes gametime. Did you want to sit there for four hours buying her drinks and getting to know her better before the option came up? There were darkspawn needed killing, man. Can't keep a game stuck at the Pearl forever just so it could adequately portray foreplay.dan107 wrote...
Charming or not -- 3 strangers after a 5 minute conversation? That says something about her. Not every, and I would wager hardly any, woman can be persuaded to something like that that quickly unless she's looking for it herself. Regardless of how charming the guy is.
Thank you for pointing this out. It is also relevant to romancing the other companions. In DA:O our actions probably covered 6 months to 1 year as I recall. If that is correct then Morrigan probably doesn't sleep with the warden until she has known him for two months give or take. They have spent a substantial portion of that time together. So the warden and Morrigan starting a romantic relationship isn't necessarily an indication of promiscuity.
I wonder if Varric will discuss Hawke's relationships as part of the framed narrative. It would be funny to see those exaggerated events.
For Morrigan sleeping with the Warden the first time I don't necessarily think that's true. It depends more on how early or late in the game you choose to follow through with this, but you can do it pretty early when way less than 2 months should have passed.
(EDIT: Not passing any judgements, just saying you can have sex pretty early on in the timeline.)
Modifié par nightcobra8928, 28 octobre 2010 - 08:44 .
Maria Caliban wrote...
Aermas wrote...
Why is everyone (including females) holding to the double standard? If man sleeps around he is an "expletive"
I don't see any female holding to a double standard. I see females who don't think men or women who have several sexual partners are morally less than those who remain chaste.
Modifié par Aermas, 28 octobre 2010 - 08:45 .
Sheryl Chee wrote...
Pacifien wrote...
I'm going with Mal/Han influence with Inara's sexually liberated attitude.
Definitely Mal/Han. Not so much the Inara, because I find her extremely dull. I almost want to say there's a bit of Zoe in there, because I love Zoe , but I can't. That would be deliberately misleading. Zoe is very much the military woman who takes orders and carries them out well and Isabela is... not.
Bruddajakka wrote...
yukidama wrote...
For Morrigan sleeping with the Warden the first time I don't necessarily think that's true. It depends more on how early or late in the game you choose to follow through with this, but you can do it pretty early when way less than 2 months should have passed.
Well the timeline on that is pretty subjective. Most of the time in my games she ends up having sex with the Warden the first time they make camp.
Who someone has had sex with doesn't determine who that person is, or isn't, and if you think it does your an idiot.
Aermas wrote...
Maria Caliban wrote...
Aermas wrote...
Why is everyone (including females) holding to the double standard? If man sleeps around he is an "expletive"
I don't see any female holding to a double standard. I see females who don't think men or women who have several sexual partners are morally less than those who remain chaste.
People are putting words in others mouths about morality & what their view are, if I say I don't like Isabela people think I am a misogynistic S.O.B. Every time someone says she is promiscuous they say the same old tired line that guys do it and are lauded while women do it & are ridiculed. I don't like it when people do that so I stated the fact that I think anyone who is that open in their sexuality is not classy, man, woman or darkspawn. Any woman who calls me a misogynist is for thinking this is wrong because I hold men to the same measuring stick. Chivalry isn't dead, but to many liberal ideas are killing it
Dan needed the ban though he was out of line
nightcobra8928 wrote...
Patriciachr34 wrote...
Fine..You find Isabela seedy and unattractive. We get that.
I find her intriguing. I wonder if we meet up with her on Llomeryn, the island south of Rivain. By it's description on the interactive map, it seems like the place a pirate would go to on occasion.
maybe we get stranded in there after a naval battle, just a thought;)
Maconbar wrote...
Its been a while since I started a new warden but my recollection was that my warden slept with Morrigan after Lothering + 1 big quest element (ie, Redcliff, Mage, Dalish...) That's how I can up with the 2 month (rough) estimate. Clearly you can run around and grab lots of the gifts and force the romance to happen more quickly. I was just using a regular run-through for this idea.
Sheryl Chee wrote...
Zoe is very much the military woman who takes orders and carries them out well and Isabela is... not.
Backstage wrote...
Aermas wrote...
Maria Caliban wrote...
Aermas wrote...
Why is everyone (including females) holding to the double standard? If man sleeps around he is an "expletive"
I don't see any female holding to a double standard. I see females who don't think men or women who have several sexual partners are morally less than those who remain chaste.
People are putting words in others mouths about morality & what their view are, if I say I don't like Isabela people think I am a misogynistic S.O.B. Every time someone says she is promiscuous they say the same old tired line that guys do it and are lauded while women do it & are ridiculed. I don't like it when people do that so I stated the fact that I think anyone who is that open in their sexuality is not classy, man, woman or darkspawn. Any woman who calls me a misogynist is for thinking this is wrong because I hold men to the same measuring stick. Chivalry isn't dead, but to many liberal ideas are killing it
Dan needed the ban though he was out of line
chivalry is dead and leliana said so
Sheryl Chee wrote...
Pacifien wrote...
I'm going with Mal/Han influence with Inara's sexually liberated attitude.
Definitely Mal/Han. Not so much the Inara, because I find her extremely dull. I almost want to say there's a bit of Zoe in there, because I love Zoe , but I can't. That would be deliberately misleading. Zoe is very much the military woman who takes orders and carries them out well and Isabela is... not.
Maconbar wrote...
Its been a while since I started a new warden but my recollection was that my warden slept with Morrigan after Lothering + 1 big quest element (ie, Redcliff, Mage, Dalish...) That's how I can up with the 2 month (rough) estimate.
Bruddajakka wrote...
Maconbar wrote...
Its been a while since I started a new warden but my recollection was that my warden slept with Morrigan after Lothering + 1 big quest element (ie, Redcliff, Mage, Dalish...) That's how I can up with the 2 month (rough) estimate. Clearly you can run around and grab lots of the gifts and force the romance to happen more quickly. I was just using a regular run-through for this idea.
You don't need to even give her anything for it to happen. It can happen just by going through her dialog tree. It doesn't take much for her to end up sleeping with you. And in her case she actually comes onto the Warden.
Oops, thought you were still talking about Isabela. Let's try to stay on topic, guies !
Modifié par nijnij, 28 octobre 2010 - 08:51 .
Icinix wrote...
...wait a minute....
..you could have a foursome in DA:O?
In all seriousness, I don't see what the big deal is. To end up with that situation you had to have three VERY sexually liberated people. This whole thing against Isabela seems a bit..I don't know...weak? My first few playthrough's didn't even know there was an option there for any kind of relation with her, and if it wasn't for forum scouring I would never have even known you end up in that position (pun absolutely intended).
If she was all these things people were crying foul about, wouldn't she be forcing herself on you and your party without prompt?
Aermas wrote...
Maria Caliban wrote...
Aermas wrote...
Why is everyone (including females) holding to the double standard? If man sleeps around he is an "expletive"
I don't see any female holding to a double standard. I see females who don't think men or women who have several sexual partners are morally less than those who remain chaste.
People are putting words in others mouths about morality & what their view are, if I say I don't like Isabela people think I am a misogynistic S.O.B. Every time someone says she is promiscuous they say the same old tired line that guys do it and are lauded while women do it & are ridiculed. I don't like it when people do that so I stated the fact that I think anyone who is that open in their sexuality is not classy, man, woman or darkspawn. Any woman who calls me a misogynist is for thinking this is wrong because I hold men to the same measuring stick. Chivalry isn't dead, but to many liberal ideas are killing it
Clearly at some point in his life he's been a woman that has had to deal with sexual discrimination and insults so he can totally empathize/sympathize whith everything that will or won't become hurtful to people like that.yukidama wrote...
You'd think, huh?Anarya wrote...
Here I'll help you out: if the word you're using is one commonly found in a two-line porn descriptor, don't use it.dan107 wrote...
Jesus. Can we use the word sex at least? Or are we going to have to start referring to it as "taking the skin boat to tuna town" or whatnot at some point? This is the 21st century. How many more perfectly legitimate words are we going to ban because they may be D-I-R-T-Y to some?Pacifien wrote...
Okay, "gangbang" is also not on the table for terms to be used during civil discourse. I shouldn't have to make a list of words that are unacceptable here, and I'm not going to. Use common sense. That's your only warning.
You'd think these things would be obvious.
Retour en haut
