Did the Council abandon and wrong the Quarian Race?
#76
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 04:24
#77
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 04:26
The quarians aren't the only ones who make mistakes. They're just the only ones who are forever condemned for them.
#78
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 04:32
#79
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 04:47
Slayer299 wrote...
That's a point a lot of Renegades have been making for quite a while...
What point?
Nightwriter wrote...
The quarians made a mistake. But what was unleashing the krogan on the galaxy? What was opening the relay
that let the rachni in?
The quarians aren't the only ones who make mistakes. They're just the only ones who are forever condemned for them.
I think these days people just see the quarians as easy targets to pick on. I don't think anybody is actively gunning for them because of a failed experiment with the geth that happened centuries ago. If they are, it's more racism on the part of individuals rather than the Council still having a bone to pick over the geth. Any problems the Council has with the quarians probably has more to do with their current habits of squatting their fleet over inhabited systems and stripmining or scavenging everything in sight.
Modifié par fongiel24, 29 octobre 2010 - 04:48 .
#80
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 05:20
How else were the Council supposed to defeat the rachni? The krogan were needed to defeat them. It was war. But it is not as if it was sanctioned by the Council to uplift them. It was discovered by salarians and they did the uplifting. At most the Council went along with it. Also, it is not known if the Council ordered those salarian explorers to open the relay to rachni controlled space.Nightwriter wrote...
The quarians made a mistake. But what was unleashing the krogan on the galaxy? What was opening the relay that let the rachni in?
The quarians aren't the only ones who make mistakes. They're just the only ones who are forever condemned for them.
Modifié par Spectre_907, 29 octobre 2010 - 05:27 .
#81
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 05:24
Modifié par Spectre_907, 29 octobre 2010 - 05:24 .
#82
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 05:47
Case in point.fongiel24 wrote...
I think these days people just see the quarians as easy targets to pick on. I don't think anybody is actively gunning for them because of a failed experiment with the geth that happened centuries ago. If they are, it's more racism on the part of individuals rather than the Council still having a bone to pick over the geth. Any problems the Council has with the quarians probably has more to do with their current habits of squatting their fleet over inhabited systems and stripmining or scavenging everything in sight.
#83
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 05:53
Slayer299 wrote...
Maybe what the Council wants is an ongoing, visual lesson with the Quarians. Something they can point to and say "this is what happens when you go against Council laws" to keep reminding everyone how powerful they are and what happens when you go against them. They can't do that to the Salarians for obvious reasons and that leaves their now whipping boys, the Quarians...
This is a good point. While it was acceptable to punish the Quarians at the time, there's no decent reason to keep punishing them when their ancestors, the ones who did it, are long gone. This actually reminds me a lot of the werewolves in DA:O (yes I know it's an ME thread, but it makes for a good comparison).
I'd be interested in seeing what the reaction from the Council would be should the Quarians + the Geth establish peace.
#84
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 08:24
#85
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 09:50
They then arrived, bombed the Shanxi colony and defense infrastructure into ash, forced General Williams to offer his surrender at some point in time, but not before they managed to get some coded distress beacon sent to Alliance High Command. Message arrives, the world's nations were paralysed with fear and then moral indgination, Systems Alliance head honcho got pissed and directed Admiral Konstantine Drescher to lead a fleet to recapture the Shanxi garrison.
Meanwhile, the Turian's were settling into a protracted siege with human guerrilla operations despite General William's surrender (why would the Turian's remain otherwise?) and were caught with their pants down when the Systems Alliance arrived and quickly caught the Turian's in their flanks and destroying their support craft (which is what the Alliance is famous for, it's 'unconventional' military doctrine. When you think about it, the Systems Alliance operates in a blend of both Turian and Salarian military commands). The Turian fleet sent to hold the Shanxi garrison must have been smashed to pieces or at the very least, the vast majority must have been permanently crippled and only a comparative few managed to escape the system back to its 'home' Mass Relay and if that's true, then the Turian forces on the ground must have been under real pressure and danger of being surrounded and overwhelmed.
#86
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 09:56
expanding panic wrote...
ATTENTION MAJOR TRUTH
You have my attention
expanding panic wrote...
Ok You say the Quarians did not intend to have created such intelligent geth; but they did! It's the same thing if someone drives drunk and hits a kid and kills him. The drunk driver goes to prison for murder. So it wasn't planned but if happened
No you would actually be convicted of manslaughter, not murder
expanding panic wrote...
The reason the Citadel would not help the quarians is because they realized that the quarians were going to try and commit genocide, however the geth were more powerful and they won.
Nope, the council were punishing the Quarians for creating the Geth in the first place
expanding panic wrote...
In terms of it being the Quarians home world this is true but you failed to mention that it is also the geths home world now.
The Geth don't live on the planet they live on space stations
#87
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 10:04
#88
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 10:55
#89
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 11:24
Spectre_907 wrote...
How else were the Council supposed to defeat the rachni? The krogan were needed to defeat them. It was war. But it is not as if it was sanctioned by the Council to uplift them. It was discovered by salarians and they did the uplifting. At most the Council went along with it. Also, it is not known if the Council ordered those salarian explorers to open the relay to rachni controlled space.Nightwriter wrote...
The quarians made a mistake. But what was unleashing the krogan on the galaxy? What was opening the relay that let the rachni in?
The quarians aren't the only ones who make mistakes. They're just the only ones who are forever condemned for them.
The point is that when a Council race makes a mistake, they are not hung out to dry.
#90
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 12:35
fongiel24 wrote...
Slayer299 wrote...
That's a point a lot of Renegades have been making for quite a while...
What point?
Sorry, my bad for not being clearer. I was responding to AdamNW's "What good is a united governmental body if they just cast aside anyone within their system who needs their help?"
#91
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 01:02
Nightwriter wrote...
The point is that when a Council race makes a mistake, they are not hung out to dry.
Double standards sure are fun, aren't they?
#92
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 01:18
We done here?
#93
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 01:41
fongiel24 wrote...
Shandepared wrote...
All our victory really says is that we're dangerous. What motivated the Council to action wasn't our victory, it was the turian's response to it.
But the turians react the same way to everybody who challenges them, regardless of whether they're a threat to the security of the rest of the galaxy or not.They (the turians) are not easily spurred to violence, but when conflict is inevitable, they only understand a concept of "total war." They do not believe in skirmishes or small-scale battles; they use massive fleets and numbers to defeat an adversary so completely that they remove any threat of having to fight the same opponent more than once. They do not exterminate their enemy, but so completely devastate their military that the enemy has no choice but to become a colony of the turians. It is theorized that another conflict between the rapidly advancing humans and the turians could annihilate a large portion of known space.
Whether it was us or a weaker power like the batarians, the modus operandi of the turians would have remained the same. Their strategic thinking lacks the concept of a "measured response". We surprised the turians in our first few engagements with them, but I doubt anyone mistook us for a rachni or krogan-level threat at the time of First Contact.
What I find puzzling is that the turians didn't have a huge technological edge. Most major technologies are based on Prothean tech but the turians have been in space much longer than us and should have built on what they learned from the Protheans. Shouldn't their military technology have far outstripped ours? Their military advantage seems to have been purely numerical rather than qualitative.
One of the underlying issues in the ME setting is that the Council races have technologically stagnated to some degree at that point, having come to rely on the semi-unravelled secrets unearthed from previous civilizations -- just as the Reapers seem to want it.
Part of what makes humanity different in the ME setting -- especially the Asari if Aethyta is dead-on -- is that they found all this Prothean stuff, said "nom nom nom", and then started adapting it in new and novel ways.
#94
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 02:15
#95
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 03:13
Nightwriter wrote...
I sometimes find it odd that humanity is hailed as the only race capable of ingenuity and inspired leaps. Makes me go "hmm".
At least in ME, the Salarians seem to value novel solutions, and the Quarians seem to do a lot with a little.
With the Asari, I don't think it's that they're incapable, it's a cultural issue. Same sort of thing with the Turians, who culturally seem to have an issue with anyone getting too far out of the norm with anything -- the nail that sticks out gets hammered.
#96
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 03:19
#97
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 03:26
Guest_Shandepared_*
#98
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 03:35
#99
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 03:48
Guest_Shandepared_*
#100
Posté 29 octobre 2010 - 04:58
If you start a war with someone else, and lose, how many other lives should you expect to be lost to avenge you?
Why, precisely, would the Council owe the Quarians anything?
The Council stood ready in case the Geth did expand, but they did not.





Retour en haut






