ErichHartmann wrote...
Aermas wrote...
Why can't we have this? It's the most believable
http://www.jetrefilm...oud1_lo-res.jpg
I find this more attractive than revealing armor.(No, I'm not a prude!)
Siradix wrote...
So we were told that chainmail bikins were never going to be included in DA2, understandable. But what's with having Isabela wear an outfit so short that we can see butt every time she jumps? Or is this the current fad? Side boobs for 2009 and butts for 2011.
Kileyan wrote...
ick, Sean Connery in a diaper
Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 29 octobre 2010 - 04:12 .
Maverick827 wrote...
Wait, why don't you have to present evidence?ShrinkingFish wrote...
Yes, I am saying Spartans did not practice Athen's tradition of pederasty. I'm no longer concerned over why Olympian's competed naked as, yes, those two links lend no academic integrity to your argument.
Now I'm interested in your evidence as to the practice of pederasty outside of Athens.
I'm pretty sure the chain of reliability goes: academic journal > Wikipedia > random forum poster
Aermas wrote...
ErichHartmann wrote...
Aermas wrote...
Why can't we have this? It's the most believable
http://www.jetrefilm...oud1_lo-res.jpg
I find this more attractive than revealing armor.
I know. It's better than seeing it all hanging out all the time
Modifié par Lord_Valandil, 29 octobre 2010 - 04:13 .
David Gaider wrote...
Siradix wrote...
So we were told that chainmail bikins were never going to be included in DA2, understandable. But what's with having Isabela wear an outfit so short that we can see butt every time she jumps? Or is this the current fad? Side boobs for 2009 and butts for 2011.
We were never against having sexy outfits. What we were trying to do is not have everything be sexy and revealing, even when it didn't make any sense. Our heavy armor is still heavy even on female characters (you can see this in the Lady Hawke armor, for instance) and even for non-armor outfits there are still more modest versions, depending on the character in question.
chex mix wrote...
can i just run around naked, wearing nothing but my boots and shield
Modifié par ShrinkingFish, 29 octobre 2010 - 04:13 .
ShrinkingFish wrote...
chex mix wrote...
can i just run around naked, wearing nothing but my boots and shield
Yes.
Plus the Ken and Barbie style underwear that you can never take off.
ShrinkingFish wrote...
Figured I'd give you an easy target. But since you brought it up. Tell me about Skaldic poetry.
Edit: Try not to take twenty minutes to look it up this time.
Ah, argumentum ad ignavum. That totally makes me want to believe you.ShrinkingFish wrote...
I asked first and am too lazy to break my text books out of storage... plus it is nearly impossible to cite anything convincingly to any forumite that doesn't have a link to the website and all my **** is hardcopy.
Upsettingshorts wrote...
Kileyan wrote...
ick, Sean Connery in a diaper
The following video is vaguely on topic because it shows a revealing outfit that isn't even remotely sexy:
ErichHartmann wrote...
chex mix wrote...
can i just run around naked, wearing nothing but my boots and shield
I use a nude mod for DAO and trust me you don't want to run around naked as male.
Modifié par Dhiro, 29 octobre 2010 - 04:19 .
Kileyan wrote...
which I think says it all. Chicks don't want to look sexy in a chainmail pair of underwear. They just do, they can't help it.
Not much we can do to fix that.
Jestina wrote...
ShrinkingFish wrote...
Figured I'd give you an easy target. But since you brought it up. Tell me about Skaldic poetry.
Edit: Try not to take twenty minutes to look it up this time.
I'm not on here all the time...and going into the poems of Vikings would set this further adrift than it already is. That's why we have a message box, if I ever decide to check it.
Maverick827 wrote...
Ah, argumentum ad ignavum. That totally makes me want to believe you.ShrinkingFish wrote...
I asked first and am too lazy to break my text books out of storage... plus it is nearly impossible to cite anything convincingly to any forumite that doesn't have a link to the website and all my **** is hardcopy.
Upsettingshorts wrote...
Honestly I had no really good reason to post that trailer. It just happens to be the trippiest film trailer I've ever seen and has Sean Connery wearing a silly outfit.
Aermas wrote...
Can Jestina & Shrinking Fish take this spat to PM?
Well, I've always felt that arrogance only serves to undermine an argument, so perhaps not. :innocent:ShrinkingFish wrote...
Don't care. You have as much reason to believe me as anyone else.
(Can't say no it's Xena!)
Retour en haut
