tmp7704 wrote...
I was mostly concerned with trying to find optimal placement to preserve overall scale of the character as well as the head size -- that extends also to the shoulders, arms and such. As a result, because the characters are shot at different angles the eyes don't line up, you're correct. That's because Isabela is "looking higher" than her human counterpart, as result of that eforementioned different camera placement.
For the sake of argument yes, it's possible to pull the part of picture that shows Isabela a few pixels down so their eyes line up. However since as you agreed this causes the bottom of her head land even further down i'm not sure if it makes any practical difference -- i don't think the effect can be dismissed as just a result of different camera angle, because different angle doesn't prevent us from taking note where the chin would end in a shot taken straight-on.
The problem is that by adjusting the picture according to shoulders, chin and hair you risk skewering the perspectibe due to stance and angle. If that juxtaposition is to work then they must have the same stance and the picture taken form the same perspective. Which they aren't. The faults you see are exaggerated due to the false similarity of the pictures.
That's why the eyes are the basepoint. The eyes are always in the middle of the face. The volume of the hair is variable, and chins (shape and size) depend from person to person (and is also heavily affected by angle). But the eyes are always in the middle. The only reliable landmark. If you adjust that you'll notice that Isabela's and Penelope's nose are the same size.
I consider the noses too small because if you take a typical face and draw a line from the eye level to the bottom of the head, then the point about right in the middle of his line determines placement of the area above the upper lip, with the bottom edge of the nose and the lip itself being at comparable distances on either side of this point.
This isn't the case with DA2 characters whose noses can be noticeably shorter (the mid point can be closer towards the upper lip) and i don't think the chin size can be blamed here, because this is more dependant on the overall size of the head, not on how large part of that head is taken by the chin.
That's actually variable between persons. That's not the case with my face for instance. The midpoint of a line between eyes and the chin ends up straight over my upper lip (then again, I have an overbite). But I'm curious... from where on the picture are you drawing that line? Could you mark it somehow? Because when I try it adds up to be close enough. Maybe we're not measuring from the same point?
But Carver's head in that shot is like, 30 pixels large and heavily affected by camera's depth of field. The problems with his proportions become less pronounced at such range, just like it happens with anyone else. But if you enlarge that part of image then it becomes rather obvious it's the same Carver as seen on the other, close-up pictures.
Hmm... you might be right. Can't process images properly on this computer so I cannot determine.





Retour en haut






