elearon1 wrote...
That's not true, it's impossible!
Seriously, I don't see why Salma Hayek is beyond my grasp. She only is if you believe her to be - you sabotage yourself there.
Modifié par ShrinkingFish, 02 novembre 2010 - 06:23 .
ShrinkingFish wrote...
elearon1 wrote...
That's not true, it's impossible!
Seriously, I don't see why Salma Hayek is beyond my grasp. She only is if you believe her to be - you sabotage yourself there.
Yeah. The only reason Salma Hayek and me aren't going to finally get together is because I'm sabotaging myself into believing it wont happen.
I REALLY have to stop doing that. Seriously.
ShrinkingFish wrote...
elearon1 wrote...
That's not true, it's impossible!
Seriously, I don't see why Salma Hayek is beyond my grasp. She only is if you believe her to be - you sabotage yourself there.
Yeah. The only reason Salma Hayek and me aren't going to finally get together is because I'm sabotaging myself into believing it wont happen.
I REALLY have to stop doing that. Seriously.
Lenimph wrote...
ShrinkingFish wrote...
elearon1 wrote...
That's not true, it's impossible!
Seriously, I don't see why Salma Hayek is beyond my grasp. She only is if you believe her to be - you sabotage yourself there.
Yeah. The only reason Salma Hayek and me aren't going to finally get together is because I'm sabotaging myself into believing it wont happen.
I REALLY have to stop doing that. Seriously.
Flemeth isn't after us normal people... Hawke is the HERO of Kirkwall. Explain to me how he isn't good enough.
(And if I got over Katy Perry.... who married that THING, you can get over Salma Hayek...)
Modifié par ShrinkingFish, 02 novembre 2010 - 06:33 .
Esbatty wrote...
ShrinkingFish wrote...
elearon1 wrote...
That's not true, it's impossible!
Seriously, I don't see why Salma Hayek is beyond my grasp. She only is if you believe her to be - you sabotage yourself there.
Yeah. The only reason Salma Hayek and me aren't going to finally get together is because I'm sabotaging myself into believing it wont happen.
I REALLY have to stop doing that. Seriously.
Dude, its not your fault.
Its not your fault.
...
Its okay to cry.
Halfno wrote...
Anyone want to get a flemeth thread going up on /b/
I think I need to sate my appetite
I'm not asking for him to be respected (I've said this plenty of times before)ShrinkingFish wrote...
Lenimph wrote...
Flemeth isn't after us normal people... Hawke is the HERO of Kirkwall. Explain to me how he isn't good enough.
(And if I got over Katy Perry.... who married that THING, you can get over Salma Hayek...)
He's just a mortal man/woman. Just a pawn for her to move across the board to turn into a queen that she can then use to roflstomp the opposing king.
You can't respect a pawn.
And I will never get over Salma Hayek! Not ever.
Modifié par Lenimph, 02 novembre 2010 - 06:38 .
Lenimph wrote...
I'm not asking for him to respected (I've said this plenty of times before)ShrinkingFish wrote...
Lenimph wrote...
ShrinkingFish wrote...
elearon1 wrote...
That's not true, it's impossible!
Seriously, I don't see why Salma Hayek is beyond my grasp. She only is if you believe her to be - you sabotage yourself there.
Yeah. The only reason Salma Hayek and me aren't going to finally get together is because I'm sabotaging myself into believing it wont happen.
I REALLY have to stop doing that. Seriously.
Flemeth isn't after us normal people... Hawke is the HERO of Kirkwall. Explain to me how he isn't good enough.
(And if I got over Katy Perry.... who married that THING, you can get over Salma Hayek...)
He's just a mortal man/woman. Just a pawn for her to move across the board to turn into a queen that she can then use to roflstomp the opposing king.
<You can't respect a pawn.> Deleted and replaced with: "And a pawn can't romance the player. It just doesn't happen. When was
the last time you took a pawn seriously? When? Or even considered one as
a sexual option?"
And I will never get over Salma Hayek! Not ever.
The only respect I want Flemeth to give Hawke is perhaps a "hey that wasn't so bad..."
Modifié par ShrinkingFish, 02 novembre 2010 - 06:38 .
I haven't checked the Rule 34 site in ages... must rectify that.Halfno wrote...
Anyone want to get a flemeth thread going up on /b/
I think I need to sate my appetite
Esbatty wrote...
I haven't checked the Rule 34 site in ages... must rectify that.Halfno wrote...
Anyone want to get a flemeth thread going up on /b/
I think I need to sate my appetite
ShrinkingFish wrote...
Deleted and replaced with: "And a pawn can't romance the player. It just doesn't happen. When was
the last time you took a pawn seriously? When? Or even considered one as
a sexual option?"
Lenimph wrote...
ShrinkingFish wrote...
Deleted and replaced with: "And a pawn can't romance the player. It just doesn't happen. When was
the last time you took a pawn seriously? When? Or even considered one as
a sexual option?"
When you had to make the pawn move by using sex!
Herpderp!
Modifié par ShrinkingFish, 02 novembre 2010 - 06:54 .
Hmm.... pawns...ShrinkingFish wrote...
Lenimph wrote...
ShrinkingFish wrote...
Deleted and replaced with: "And a pawn can't romance the player. It just doesn't happen. When was
the last time you took a pawn seriously? When? Or even considered one as
a sexual option?"
When you had to make the pawn move by using sex!
Herpderp!
Flemeth is far too sophisticated for such rudementary manipulations.
Edit: And I have never had to screw a pawn to get it to move a space forward. Thank goodness.
Modifié par Lenimph, 02 novembre 2010 - 06:59 .
Lenimph wrote...
Hmm.... pawns...ShrinkingFish wrote...
Lenimph wrote...
ShrinkingFish wrote...
Deleted and replaced with: "And a pawn can't romance the player. It just doesn't happen. When was
the last time you took a pawn seriously? When? Or even considered one as
a sexual option?"
When you had to make the pawn move by using sex!
Herpderp!
Flemeth is far too sophisticated for such rudementary manipulations.
Edit: And I have never had to screw a pawn to get it to move a space forward. Thank goodness.
And secondly... Oh really now? thats why she didn't give Morrigan lessons about such a matter?
ShrinkingFish wrote...
Lenimph wrote...
Hmm.... pawns...ShrinkingFish wrote...
Lenimph wrote...
ShrinkingFish wrote...
Deleted and replaced with: "And a pawn can't romance the player. It just doesn't happen. When was
the last time you took a pawn seriously? When? Or even considered one as
a sexual option?"
When you had to make the pawn move by using sex!
Herpderp!
Flemeth is far too sophisticated for such rudementary manipulations.
Edit: And I have never had to screw a pawn to get it to move a space forward. Thank goodness.
And secondly... Oh really now? thats why she didn't give Morrigan lessons about such a matter?
Morrigan is an amatuer compared to Flemeth. Flemeth is a master manipulator. Morrigan is proof. She'll send someone else to have sex with you rather than do it herself. No need. She's too good for that game.
Exactly!Fortlowe wrote...
So if Morrigan is an inexperianced amatuer...... then I wanna step up to the Pros baby!
Fortlowe wrote...
ShrinkingFish wrote...
Lenimph wrote...
Hmm.... pawns...ShrinkingFish wrote...
Lenimph wrote...
ShrinkingFish wrote...
Deleted and replaced with: "And a pawn can't romance the player. It just doesn't happen. When was
the last time you took a pawn seriously? When? Or even considered one as
a sexual option?"
When you had to make the pawn move by using sex!
Herpderp!
Flemeth is far too sophisticated for such rudementary manipulations.
Edit: And I have never had to screw a pawn to get it to move a space forward. Thank goodness.
And secondly... Oh really now? thats why she didn't give Morrigan lessons about such a matter?
Morrigan is an amatuer compared to Flemeth. Flemeth is a master manipulator. Morrigan is proof. She'll send someone else to have sex with you rather than do it herself. No need. She's too good for that game.
So if Morrigan is an inexperianced amatuer...... then I wanna step up to the Pros baby!
She slept with the guy from My name is Earl... i think you got a shot.ShrinkingFish wrote...
Fortlowe wrote...
ShrinkingFish wrote...
Lenimph wrote...
Hmm.... pawns...ShrinkingFish wrote...
Lenimph wrote...
ShrinkingFish wrote...
Deleted and replaced with: "And a pawn can't romance the player. It just doesn't happen. When was
the last time you took a pawn seriously? When? Or even considered one as
a sexual option?"
When you had to make the pawn move by using sex!
Herpderp!
Flemeth is far too sophisticated for such rudementary manipulations.
Edit: And I have never had to screw a pawn to get it to move a space forward. Thank goodness.
And secondly... Oh really now? thats why she didn't give Morrigan lessons about such a matter?
Morrigan is an amatuer compared to Flemeth. Flemeth is a master manipulator. Morrigan is proof. She'll send someone else to have sex with you rather than do it herself. No need. She's too good for that game.
So if Morrigan is an inexperianced amatuer...... then I wanna step up to the Pros baby!
But the pros use different bats...
I think I've lost the analogy.
Anyways. End point being.
Salma Hayek is entirely too sexy. It is unfair.
Esbatty wrote...
She slept with the guy from My name is Earl... i think you got a shot.
But the pros use different bats...
I think I've lost the analogy.
Anyways. End point being.
Salma Hayek is entirely too sexy. It is unfair.
...
Anywho, if Morrigan is the farm team then yeah thats about as much as I wanna handle.
Win!Esbatty wrote...
She slept with the guy from My name is Earl... i think you got a shot.ShrinkingFish wrote...
Salma Hayek is entirely too sexy. It is unfair.
And the deadliest...Halfno wrote...
Continuing on the Morrigan point, we assume Morrigan *has never touched before*. It would be interesting to go out with the biggest cougar of all time
Retour en haut